Skip to main content

TEQSA’s provider portal is unavailable.

Further details
Header url menu
  • Guidance notes
  • Complaints
  • Media
  • Provider portal
Home
News and events
Main navigation
  • About us

      About us

    • TEQSA overview
      • Our role
      • Our values
      • FAQS
      • Higher Education Integrity Unit
      • Our leadership and organisation
    • Engagement
      • Consultation
      • Our engagement with students
      • International engagement
      • Information for TEQSA external experts
      • Memorandums of understanding
      • Surveys
      • Australian Universities Accord
    • Reporting and accountability
      • Annual report
      • Corporate plan
      • Freedom of information and disclosure log
      • Gifts and benefits
      • Privacy
      • Financial reporting
      • Information publication scheme agency plan
      • Public interest disclosures
      • AI transparency statement
      • Emissions reduction plan
    • Fees and charges
      • Registered Higher Education provider (RHEP) charge
      • Application-based fees
      • TEQSA's Cost Recovery Implementation Statement
      • Cost recovery for regulatory activity - FAQs
      • How we consult on fees and charges
    • News and events
      • Latest news
      • Media centre
      • TEQSA events
      • TEQSA e-News
    • Contact us
      • Raising a complaint or concern
      • Complaints about TEQSA
      • Reporting a suspected academic cheating service
    • Our policies
    • Careers
  • How we regulate

      How we regulate

    • Our approach to quality assurance and regulation
    • Public reporting
    • Risk assessment cycle
    • Acts and standards
      • Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2021
      • TEQSA Act
      • ESOS Act
      • National Code of Practice
      • Australian Qualifications Framework
    • TEQSA's work to support social cohesion and safety in higher education
    • Compliance monitoring approach
      • Compliance Monitoring Framework
      • Compliance priorities
      • Compliance reports
    • Review of TEQSA decisions
    • Statements of Regulatory Expectations
      • Statement of Regulatory Expectations: Compliance with workplace obligations
      • Statement of Regulatory Expectations: Student grievance and complaint mechanisms
    • Dual sector regulatory strategy
  • Guides and resources

      Guides and resources

    • Protecting academic integrity
      • Academic integrity toolkit
      • TEQSA Masterclass: Contract cheating detection and deterrence
      • Academic integrity experts advice hub
    • Compliance in focus
      • Compliance in focus – student wellbeing and safety
      • Compliance in focus – education agent monitoring
      • Compliance in focus – academic integrity
      • Compliance in focus – change of ownership
      • Compliance in focus – cyber security
    • Higher education good practice hub
      • Gen AI knowledge hub
      • Teaching and learning
      • Assessments and academic integrity
      • Online teaching for practice-based subjects
      • Welfare and wellbeing
      • Experts advice hub
      • Additional resources
    • Resources
      • Sector updates and alerts
      • Cyber security
      • Guidance notes
    • Admissions transparency
    • Retention
    • Glossary of terms
    • Application forms and support
    • Key contacts at TEQSA for providers
    • Provider enquiries help and support
      • Provider enquiries help and support – FAQs
  • National Register

      National Register

    • About the National Register
    • Unsuccessful applications
    • Entities that are not registered higher education providers
  • Students

      Students

    • Artificial intelligence - advice for students
      • Artificial intelligence: advice for students (translated versions)
    • How TEQSA protects student interests
    • Understanding academic integrity
      • What is academic integrity?
      • Identifying, avoiding and reporting illegal cheating services
      • Download hub
      • Translated resources
      • Understanding academic integrity: Frequently asked questions (FAQs)
    • Student wellbeing
      • Sexual assault and sexual harassment
      • Other student support services
    • Student academic misconduct resources
      • Student responsibilities
      • Understanding academic misconduct allegations
      • The investigation process
      • Responding to the allegation
      • Outcomes and penalties
      • Appeals
      • Support resources
      • Impact on international students
      • Contract cheating, large scale cases and gen AI
      • Learning from an allegation of academic misconduct
      • FAQs
      • Glossary
    • What students can expect from providers
    • Checking provider registration or course accreditation
    • Student Advisory Panel
    • Provider closure and student records
    • Translated resources for students
  • Provider registration

      Provider registration

    • New providers
      • Before applying for registration as a higher education provider
      • How to apply for registration as a higher education provider
      • Key considerations for prospective providers preparing a self-assurance report (initial registration)
      • Indicative timeframes for registration
    • Registered providers
      • How to apply to renew provider registration
      • How to apply for self-accrediting authority (SAA)
      • How to apply to change provider category
      • Key considerations for providers preparing a self-assurance report (renewal of registration)
      • How to withdraw provider registration
      • Requirements and responsibilities for registered providers (including material changes)
    • Transnational education providers
      • How to apply for authorisation to provide Australian courses offshore
      • Notifications required of providers with authorisation to provide Australian courses offshore
  • Course accreditation

      Course accreditation

    • Course accreditation applications
    • Renewing course accreditation
    • Withdrawing a course and teachout
    • Key considerations for providers preparing a self-assurance report (course accreditation for registered providers)
    • Key considerations for providers preparing a self-assurance report (renewal of course accreditation)
    • Key considerations for providers preparing a self-assurance report (renewal of course accreditation in teach out)
  • CRICOS and ELICOS

      CRICOS and ELICOS

    • What is the ESOS Framework?
    • How to apply for CRICOS registration
    • How to apply to renew CRICOS registration
      • Application guide for renewing CRICOS registration
    • How to apply to relocate or add a new location on CRICOS
    • How to apply to change student capacity on CRICOS
    • How to add or withdraw a course on CRICOS
    • How to apply for TEQSA to assess a third-party agreement
    • Notifications and approvals required of CRICOS registered providers
    • How to apply to add a Foundation Program to CRICOS
    • How to apply to add an ELICOS course to CRICOS
    • CRICOS - frequently asked questions (FAQs)
  • Risks to academic integrity from AI

    Banner with the text: Academic integrity toolkit: Risks to academic integrity from AI

    This section of the toolkit explores the detection of plagiarism in generative artificial intelligence (gen AI) derived text, approaches to assessment design in the age of gen AI, and ethical and effective approaches to integrate gen AI into the curriculum.

    Video

    Resources
    • Assessment reform in the age of artificial intelligence
    • Detecting plagiarism of AI-generated text in student assessments and securing take-home written assessments New!
    • Enacting assessment reform in a time of artificial intelligence
    • Gen AI strategies for Australian higher education: Emerging practice
    • Gen AI – academic integrity and assessment reform
    • Gen AI knowledge hub
    Last updated:
    8 May 2026

    Related links

    • Academic integrity toolkit
  • Good practice note: Addressing contract cheating to safeguard academic integrity

    Body

    Second edition

    This Good Practice Note is intended to complement the TEQSA Guidance note: Academic and research integrity.

    The recommendations in this Good Practice Note correspond to the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2021 and provide specific, practical advice to address contract cheating in relation to five critical areas:

    • policies to promote academic integrity
    • procedures and policies to address academic integrity breaches
    • actions to mitigate risks to academic integrity
    • the provision of academic integrity guidance
    • good practices to maintain academic integrity.

    This Good Practice Note provides Australian higher education providers with access to research and exemplars to enable the development of policies and processes to minimise contract cheating. This endeavour is part of a sector-wide agenda to safeguard academic integrity and is critical to protect students’ learning outcomes, institutional reputations, educational standards, professional practice and public safety.

    Good Practice Note: Addressing contract cheating to safeguard academic integrity (second edition)  (PDF, 2.4 MB)

    Stakeholder
    Sector
    Publication type
    Good practice notes
    Fri, 2026-05-08 12:00
  • Substantiating contract cheating: A guide for investigators

    Body

    Since TEQSA’s Academic integrity toolkit was first released in 2020, staff at Australian universities have developed world-leading approaches to systematically detecting contract cheating. As the nature and scale of contract cheating has become more apparent through both investigative work and research, approaches to detection and gathering of evidence required to substantiate concerns of contract cheating have changed significantly.

    Substantiating contract cheating: A guide for investigators  (PDF, 298 KB)

    Stakeholder
    Sector
    Publication type
    Corporate publications

    Related links

    • Academic integrity toolkit
    Fri, 2026-05-08 12:00
  • Role-specific guide to promoting academic integrity, and managing and investigating academic misconduct

    Body

    This guide is designed to help individuals and institutions understand the common roles and likely responsibilities of staff in relation to academic integrity. There are differing operational models across the sector, with some institutions preferring more or less centralised or decentralised academic integrity responsibilities. However, this resource should assist in identifying the role and associated actions you may undertake throughout the academic misconduct process at your institution. Similarly, terms used across the sector may differ, so you will need to consider which relates most closely to your role or is the equivalent term at your institution.

    Role-specific guide to promoting academic integrity, and managing and investigating academic misconduct  (PDF, 469 KB)

    Stakeholder
    Sector
    Publication type
    Corporate publications

    Related links

    • Academic integrity toolkit
    Fri, 2026-05-08 12:00
  • Commercial academic cheating

    Banner with the text: Academic integrity toolkit: Commercial academic cheating

    This section of the toolkit offers a range of different resources, including guidance on substantiating and detecting contract cheating, strategies to improve assessment design and deter file sharing, and practical ways to apply quality assurance principles and build strong frameworks to protect academic integrity.

    Video

    TEQSA Masterclass: Contract cheating detection and deterrence

    This short course and accompanying situational judgment test (SJT) will build your baseline knowledge about academic integrity issues and techniques and practices for deterring and detecting contract cheating.

    • Contract cheating detection and deterrence
    Resources
    • Contract cheating and assessment design (PDF, 1.9 MB)
    • Detecting and addressing contract cheating in online assessment
    • Good Practice Note: Addressing contract cheating to safeguard academic integrity (second edition) New!
    • Preventing contract cheating
    • Sharing is caring? Exploring academic integrity and file-sharing behaviours
      • Webinar
      • Slides (PDF, 4.4 MB)
    • Substantiating contract cheating for symbol-dense, logical responses in any discipline, particularly mathematics (PDF, 315 KB)
    • Substantiating contract cheating: A guide for investigators New!
    • The prevention of contract cheating in an online environment (PDF, 230 KB)
    • Toolkit to support quality assurance agencies to address academic integrity and contract cheating
    Case studies
    • Beware of ghosts - explaining contract cheating and ghostwriting and why you shouldn’t do it (Kiata Rundle, Murdoch University; Guy Curtis, University of Western Australia) (PDF, 38 KB)
    • Contract cheating and blackmail (Jon Yorke, Lesley Sefcik and Terisha Veeran-Colton, Curtin University) (PDF, 172 KB)
    • Hypothetical contract cheating cluster investigation example: Identifying cheating at scale
    • Redesigning high-risk assessments to engage students and address contract cheating (Samer Skaik, CQUniversity) (PDF, 41 KB)
    Last updated:
    8 May 2026

    Related links

    • Academic integrity toolkit
  • Other resources

    Banner with the text: Academic integrity toolkit - Other resources

    This section of the toolkit brings together a wide range of materials to support academic integrity from multiple perspectives. It provides guides, case studies and resources for educators and institutions seeking deeper insights and actionable strategies to strengthen integrity practices.

    Videos

    Summary video

    Academic integrity in Australian higher education – a national priority: Workshop video

    Academic integrity in Australian higher education – a national priority: 2025 update

    Slides
    • Academic integrity in Australian higher education - a national priority: Workshop slides
    Case studies
    • Addressing copyright infringement on student academic file sharing sites (Associate Professor Christine Slade and Dr James Lewandowski-Cox, The University of Queensland)
    • An overview of culture and academic integrity: Myth busting the notion that international students are more likely to engage in academic misconduct (Guy Curtis, University of Western Australia)
    • Belonging, academic integrity and my international students (Dr Katherine Sugars, Murdoch University)
    • Individual support appointments for academic integrity breach education (Fiona Perry, Dr Anu Sharma, Associate Professor Michelle Cavaleri, Margaret Redestowicz, Education Centre Australia Higher Education)
    • Linking values and virtues to academic integrity (Marie Chittleborough, EQUALS International) (PDF, 169 KB)
    • Maintaining academic integrity in an online environment (Margot McNeill, Jonathan Hvaal, Alexander Roper and Trevor Clark, International College of Management Sydney) (PDF, 37 KB)
    • Making academic integrity visible through an eyecatching website (making academic integrity visible) (Alison Reedy, Amanda Janssen, Alison Lockley, Helen Rysavy and Penny Wurm, Charles Darwin University) (PDF, 230 KB)
    • Reimagining educational approaches to academic integrity (Alison Reedy, Amanda Janssen, Alison Lockley and Penny Wurm, Charles Darwin University) (PDF, 362 KB)
    • The benefit of using structured questions and evidence to investigate alleged plagiarism by first-year students (Guy Curtis, University of Western Australia)
    • Using an online training module to improve awareness of and attitudes towards academic integrity and plagiarism (Helen Correia, Murdoch University) (PDF, 39 KB)
    Academic integrity organisations
    • Australasian Academic Integrity Network
    • European Network for Academic Integrity
    • Global Academic Integrity Network
    • International Center for Academic Integrity
    Translated resources
    • Translated resources (understanding academic integrity)
    Guides
    • A guide for creating academic integrity resources for international students in Australian higher education
    • Role-specific guide to promoting academic integrity, and managing and investigating academic misconduct New!
    Last updated:
    8 May 2026

    Related links

    • Academic integrity toolkit
  • Academic integrity toolkit

    Banner with the text: Academic integrity toolkit

    Introduction

    In 2020, TEQSA launched the first edition of our Academic Integrity Toolkit to share research and assist integrity professionals to promote academic integrity and address commercial academic cheating at their institution.

    Academic integrity is integral to preserving the reputation of Australia’s higher education sector and protecting student interests.

    TEQSA’s updated Academic Integrity Toolkit responds to new and emerging risks posed to academic integrity. In recent years, readily available and rapidly developing generative artificial intelligence (gen AI) tools have emerged. TEQSA has also observed changes in the promotion and marketing approaches used by commercial academic cheating services. The revised edition builds on the existing toolkit’s sections on policy and benchmarking and contract cheating. It offers new resources on assessment design and security, and risks to academic integrity from gen AI.

    This initiative was funded by the Australian Government and the toolkit can be accessed free of charge.

    The resources and case studies in this toolkit represent approaches and ideas which institutions have found useful in addressing academic integrity. They are not intended as guidance from TEQSA but are instead shared to encourage institutions to consider different approaches which may be useful in supporting academic integrity at their institution.

    Introductory video

    Sections

    Decorative image
    Policy and benchmarking
    Decorative image
    Commercial academic cheating
    Decorative image
    Assessment design and security
    Decorative image
    Risks to academic integrity from AI
    Decorative image
    Other resources
    Last updated:
    8 May 2026

    Related links

    • Higher education good practice hub
    • Contract cheating
    • Protecting academic integrity
  • TEQSA’s provider portal is unavailable

    TEQSA’s provider portal is unavailable

    22 April 2026

    TEQSA’s provider portal is unavailable to use until further notice.

    Earlier this month TEQSA became aware of potential cyber security vulnerabilities to the provider portal. While no data breach has occurred, TEQSA took immediate action by taking our provider portal offline as a precaution while investigations continue. Ensuring the security of providers' data is a high priority for TEQSA, and we want to be confident the safeguards and protections we have in place are of a high standard.  

    For the immediate future, TEQSA will use SIGBOX for document transfer where email is not available. SIGBOX is a secure, Australian-hosted tool, used by numerous Australian government agencies for file-sharing.  

    Details of process changes for providers, along with a SIGBOX user guide, are provided below.

    We appreciate your patience, cooperation and understanding as we prioritise the security and integrity of provider information.

    Changes to processes for providers

    Where email is not available, secure alternate arrangements are in place:

    • reporting against conditions, or responding to requests for information – reach out to the TEQSA assessment team specified in the request
    • commencing an application for re-registration, course accreditation, or CRICOS operational assessments:
      • Email CRM@teqsa.gov.au specifying the type of application you wish to make. Please include your provider name and provider ID.
      • TEQSA will create a new SIGBOX folder for each application or request for information, and will send an email with an application number and a link providing access to the SIGBOX folder to the authorised portal administrator
      • The SIGBOX link may be shared by the administrator with other users in your organisation who are submitting information to TEQSA. Please note that TEQSA will create new SIGBOX folders for each application or request for information.
    • For all other queries, please contact the Enquiries Management team at providerenquiries@teqsa.gov.au.
       

    Using SIGBOX

    A SIGBOX user guide is available for providers.

    Frequently asked questions

    Is my data safe? Yes. TEQSA has taken this action as a precaution and in line with our commitment to safeguarding provider data. No data breach has occurred. Ensuring the protection of information is a high priority for TEQSA, and we want to be confident the controls we have in place are of the highest standard.

    When will the Provider Portal be reinstated? The portal will be unavailable until further notice. SIGBOX is currently being used for file transfers, to support regulatory assessments, and TEQSA is working on additional solutions. We will provide more information as this work progresses.

    How will the unavailability of the Provider Portal impact my submission deadlines? To ensure TEQSA’s regulatory assessment work continues, we are currently using SIGBOX for file transfers. SIGBOX is a secure Australian-based file-sharing site, used by several Australian government agencies. A user guide to SIGBOX is available.

    TEQSA will work with providers to support the continuation of application and assessment processes. If you are concerned about the impact this unexpected closure may cause on an upcoming assessment, please contact the appropriate assessment team noted on the key provider contacts page of our website.

    Additional support

    If you require further support, or have additional questions, please contact our Enquiries Management team at providerenquiries@teqsa.gov.au. 
     

    Last updated:
    8 May 2026
  • Policy and benchmarking

    Banner with the text: Academic integrity toolkit: Policy and benchmarking

    This section of the toolkit helps you evaluate and benchmark your policies and practices to support good learning, teaching and research.

    Video

    Benchmarking
    • Benchmarking checklist (PDF version, 60 KB) (MS Word version, 38 KB)
    • Benchmarking infographic (PDF, 122 KB)
    Case studies
    • Academic integrity and decision-making - an integrated approach (Lesley Sefcik and Jon Yorke, Curtin University) (PDF, 52 KB)
    • Academic integrity policy and procedure (Dr Amy Milka and Amanda Janssen, Adelaide University)
    • Gen AI policy evolution at Southern Cross University (Professor Ruth Greenaway, Dr Zachery Quince, Southern Cross University)
    • Providing more time for assessment and academic integrity (policies and procedures) (Karen van Haeringen, Griffith University) (PDF, 40 KB)
    Last updated:
    19 Mar 2026

    Related links

    • Academic integrity toolkit

Pagination

  • ‹
  • …
  • Page 79
  • Page 80
  • Page 81
  • Page 82
  • Current page 83
  • Page 84
  • Page 85
  • Page 86
  • Page 87
  • …
  • Next page ›

TEQSA

Using this website

  • Accessibility
  • Copyright
  • FOI and disclosure log
  • Information publication scheme
  • Search
  • Site map
  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Latest news
  • Work at TEQSA
  • Contact us
  • Report a suspected cheating service
Subscribe to our newsletter

In the spirit of reconciliation, TEQSA acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of Country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We pay our respect to their Elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.