You have the right to appeal academic misconduct decisions by presenting valid reasons or new evidence to an appeals committee for a fair review.
You can…
Speak up
If you spot procedural mistakes, have new evidence or feel like you were treated unfairly you are entitled to appeal the decision of your case. Just keep in mind that simply disagreeing with the decision isn’t enough and you’ll need valid reasons to back up your appeal.
Write up your appeal and outline your reasons clearly
Make sure you include any new evidence you’ve found or point out any errors in how your case was handled. Preparing for this step is important, as you’ll present your case to the appeals committee (most institutions operate a committee, but it can also be a single staff member). Think of it like a chance to explain your side of the story to a group that’s tasked with reviewing everything fairly and making a fresh decision.
Review the appeals committee decision
Take your time to read through the appeals committee’s decision carefully so you understand what’s being said. If you still feel like things weren’t handled right, you’ve got other options, like reaching out to an external ombudsman for help. No matter what happens, it’s important to follow the decision and any penalties or requirements laid out, not only when the final decision is reached, but also throughout the appeals process.
 |
RememberUse this whole experience as a learning opportunity. Take a moment to reflect and figure out how you can adjust your study habits to avoid a similar situation in the future. |
Why lodge an appeal?
The primary reason for lodging an appeal is to seek a review of an academic decision that you believe to be unjust or incorrect. Common grounds for appeal include:
- New evidence: Emerging evidence that was not available during the initial investigation or decision-making process.
- Procedural errors: Flaws in the way the original decision was made, such as a breach of the institution’s policies or unfair treatment.
- Bias: Perceived or actual bias from the individuals involved in the original decision.
- Extenuating circumstances: Situations beyond your control, such as medical emergencies or personal crises, that impacted your academic performance.
Who is involved?
Several parties are typically involved in the appeals process, including:
- You, the student: The individual lodging the appeal.
- Administrative staff: Staff who provide guidance on the appeal process and assist with documentation.
- Responsible person or committee: A staff member, group of staff members and sometimes students who review the appeal and make a decision.
- Legal advisors or ombudsman: In some cases, you may seek assistance from legal advisors or an ombudsman to ensure fairness and transparency.
Why an appeal might get rejected
Not all appeals are successful. Common reasons for rejection include:
- Insufficient evidence: Failing to provide adequate evidence to support the claims made in the appeal.
- Non-compliance with procedures: Not adhering to procedures, such as missing deadlines or incomplete submissions.
- Lack of merit: The appeals committee determines that the original decision was fair and justified based on the available information.
- Invalid grounds: The appeal is based on reasons not recognised by the institution’s policies, such as merely disagreeing with the outcome without substantive justification.
If you have valid reasons to appeal the appeals process allow you to have a fair opportunity to seek review of decisions regarding academic misconduct, grades, or other academic issues.
Table: Examples of valid vs invalid grounds for appeal
| Valid grounds for appeal | Invalid grounds for appeal |
|---|---|
| Discovery of new evidence that was unavailable during the original decision-making process. | Disagreement with the outcome without presenting any evidence or procedural concerns. |
| Procedural errors that affected the fairness of the original decision. | Belief that the penalty imposed is too harsh without providing a valid justification. |
| Bias or conflict of interest demonstrated by a decision-maker during the process. | General dissatisfaction with the institution’s policies or rules. |
| Failure by the institution to consider submitted evidence during the original review. | Requesting an appeal due to personal stress or unrelated circumstances. |
| Incorrect application or misinterpretation of institutional guidelines or rules. | Appealing solely to gain more time to complete other academic tasks. |
| Clear and documented inconsistencies between the decision and the evidence presented. | Claiming ignorance of the rules or procedures as the sole basis for the appeal. |
How to file an appeal with your higher education institute
Filing an appeal with your higher education institute can be a crucial step in addressing academic disputes and seeking a fair resolution. This guide outlines the essential steps to help you navigate the appeal process effectively.
1. Understand the grounds for appeal
Before initiating an appeal, it is important to understand the valid grounds recognised by your institution. Common grounds include:
- New evidence: Availability of new and relevant evidence that was not considered in the original decision.
- Procedural errors: Mistakes or irregularities in the application of institutional procedures that may have adversely affected the outcome.
- Mitigating circumstances: Personal circumstances beyond your control that may have impacted your performance or the decision.
2. Review policies
Check your institution’s website or student handbook for detailed information on the appeal process, deadlines and required documentation. Understanding the specific policies and procedures will help ensure that your appeal is compliant and complete. There will probably be strict timelines involved, so make sure you’re aware of them.
3. Prepare your appeal
Draft a clear and concise appeal letter that includes:
- Introduction: State your intent to appeal and provide a brief overview of the situation.
- Grounds for appeal: Clearly outline the reasons for your appeal, supported by relevant evidence.
- Supporting documentation: Attach any new evidence, medical certificates or other pertinent documents.
- Conclusion: Summarise your appeal and request a specific action or reconsideration.
4. Submit your appeal
Ensure that your appeal is submitted within the specified deadline and through the appropriate channels (for example, online portal, email or in-person). Keep copies of all submitted documents for your records.
5. Attend the appeal hearing
If your appeal proceeds to a hearing, be prepared to present your case and answer questions from the appeals committee. Practice providing clear and concise responses and bring copies of all submitted documents.
6. Await the decision
After the hearing, the appeals committee will review your case and make a decision. Be patient during this period and follow up if necessary.
How to lodge an appeal
The process of lodging an appeal typically involves several steps:
- Review the institution’s policies
- Gather evidence
- Draft an appeal letter
- Submit the appeal
- Attend the hearing
|
RememberYou can contact the National Student Ombudsman for advice and assistance if you believe your institution did not manage your appeal appropriately. The NSO can be contacted on 1300 395 775 or via their website. |
Student academic misconduct resources