• About us

  • Entities that are not registered higher education providers

    Australian law requires all higher education providers to be TEQSA registered.

    Anyone who is not registered with TEQSA who advertises higher education is known as an unregistered entity.

    Risks posed by unregistered entities

    Unregistered entities pose a risk to students and the integrity of Australian higher education.

    These risks include:

    • the quality of education offered by unregistered entities has not been assured by TEQSA
    • awards from unregistered entities are not recognised in Australia. This can harm students' future employment or study prospects
    • the financial cost and time lost by students who enrol at an unregistered entity.

    Finding a TEQSA registered provider

    The National Register has details of all TEQSA registered providers in Australia.

    • you can search the National Register to make sure your provider is TEQSA registered
    • you can also check the provider’s website – this should display a registration number or provide information on its registration status.

    If you are studying at an unregistered entity

    This entity is not registered to offer a higher education. You will not be awarded a higher education qualification on completion of your study. If you believe you have been misled, your local state and territory consumer protection agency can provide you with information about your rights.

    Reporting and responding to unregistered entities

    If the higher education provider you are considering is not listed on the National Register, report it via our online form.

    There are a range of regulatory responses that we may take. Our response will depend on the type of entity, whether it is within our remit and whether there is a breach of the TEQSA Act.

    Usually, we will engage with the unregistered entity and ask them to take action to address our concerns.

    If they do not take appropriate action, we may publish their details on the TEQSA website.

    List of unregistered entities

    The entities listed below are not registered with TEQSA. This means that they are not able to offer or confer higher education awards in Australia.

    We have published the details of these unregistered entities to inform students1.

    Name of entity Course(s) advertised Entity’s website(s) Date details of entity published on TEQSA website
    Business Name:
    College for Educational and Clinical Art Therapy
    Diploma in Educational and Clinical Art Therapy arttherapycourses.com.au 21 December 2021
    Business name:
    International College of Celebrancy
    • Diploma of Marriage Celebrancy
    • Diploma of Funeral Celebrancy
    • Diploma of General Celebrancy
    • Advanced Diploma of Marriage Celebrancy
    • Advanced Diploma of Funeral Celebrancy
    • Advanced Diploma of General Celebrancy
    • Graduate Diploma of Celebrancy
    • Master of Celebrancy
    www.collegeofcelebrancy.com.au
    www.celebrancy.com
    iccdiplomas.com 
    21 December 2021

    Business name:
    Royal Art Society of NSW

    • RAS Diploma
    www.royalart.com.au 21 December 2021

    Entity details will remain published on this webpage until TEQSA considers that the risks are mitigated.

    Notes

    1.  We make no comment that any particular entity published in this list is in breach of the TEQSA Act.
    Last updated:
  • ANAO report on TEQSA's regulation of higher education

    TEQSA welcomes the Australian National Audit Office’s performance audit report on its regulation of higher education. 

    Findings

    The ANAO audit report found that TEQSA’s regulatory activities were effective or largely effective in all but one element of the audit. These findings confirm that TEQSA is meeting its purpose under the TEQSA Act to regulate higher education according to the principles of regulatory necessity, risk and proportionality. 

    Importantly, the overwhelming success of the Australian higher education sector since TEQSA’s regulatory functions commenced in 2011-2012, provides strong evidence of the effectiveness of the agency’s work to protect student interests, and safeguard the quality and reputation of Australian higher education.

    Recommendations

    TEQSA accepts all five recommendations, in relation to its compliance and enforcement activities, and notes that work was already underway or planned to make improvements in these areas. This includes strengthening TEQSA’s existing compliance monitoring framework, improvements to the planning of compliance assessments, and ensuring the timely assessment of material submitted by providers. 

    TEQSA has also implemented processes for consistent handling of material change notifications and reporting of compliance activity, with a full regulatory operations report to be published in July 2020. 

    “As a relatively new agency, TEQSA welcomes its first performance audit report by the Australian National Audit Office, and its findings and recommendations,” said Professor Nick Saunders, TEQSA Chief Commissioner. 

    “We recognise there is more work to be done, and TEQSA is committed to continuing to work with the sector to protect student interests and the world class quality and reputation of Australian higher education.” 

    “TEQSA would like to thank the ANAO audit team for their work and the diligent, constructive and professional manner in which the audit was conducted.”  

    Further information

    Date
    Last updated:
  • TEQSA publishes suite of resources for online learning

    In its latest step to support the sector during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, TEQSA is publishing a suite of online learning resources for providers to assist the sector’s transition to online learning, and is calling for the sector to contribute. 

    “TEQSA is proud to draw together the expert resources from within our sector, and share them with providers to support online delivery of higher education,” said Professor Nick Saunders, TEQSA Chief Commissioner and Acting CEO. 

    “TEQSA is aware that many providers, particularly independent providers, have made the transition to online delivery with little support and few resources, and we commend their adaptability and resilience. We also commend the sector more broadly, for its commitment to continuing to uphold the Higher Education Standards during the challenges presented by the pandemic.”

    “This online learning resource is a work in progress, and we invite further contributions to help it to grow.”

    To date, the resources cover a range of topics related to online learning, from getting started and helping workforces to work online, to student experiences and assessment integrity. 

    “We appreciate that not all resources will be relevant to every provider, so we’ve presented them in an accessible way which is easy to peruse,” said Professor Saunders.

    “TEQSA is committed to working in partnership with the sector, and this endures in ordinary, and extraordinary, circumstances.”

    Media enquiries 

    Michelle Alexander, Assistant Director, Communications: comms@teqsa.gov.au, 0437 143 012

    Date
    Last updated:
  • Impacts of COVID-19 on Industry Professional Accreditation

    TEQSA is working to support the higher education sector during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, while fulfilling its key responsibilities to safeguard the reputation of Australian higher education, and the interests of students. 

    To support the sector during the pandemic, TEQSA is taking a more flexible approach to the application of the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2015 and other legislative requirements on a case-by-case basis. Our latest advice for the sector can be found on our website. We are working directly with providers to consider their individual circumstances, as well as to understand the impacts on the sector as a whole, including the transition to online delivery. 

    TEQSA acknowledges that some industry professional accreditation issues will arise over this period, and suggests that providers and industry professional bodies similarly work together to address issues as they arise and minimise the regulatory burden on a case-by-case basis.

    Currently, TEQSA has identified three key issues for providers and industry professional bodies, relating to the quality of the student experience:  

    • The integrity of assessment: At all times providers must uphold the integrity of assessment in a course of study, with a focus on the achievement of course and unit learning outcomes. Providers must also protect the academic integrity of the assessment process.
    • Placements: TEQSA acknowledges the immense variation and complexity in clinical and other placements across the professions, and appreciates that access to placement opportunities during COVID-19 will vary across the professions.
    • Provisional registration: How the registration of final year students (on successful completion of their studies and eligibility to graduate) will be managed, in terms of provisional registration, and consideration of support that will need to be put in place to underpin the skills of our future graduate workforce. 

    In the first instance, TEQSA encourages providers to contact the specific industry professional body to discuss specific circumstances in relation to accredited programs. 

    TEQSA will continue to work with Universities Australia, industry professional body representatives such as the Australian Council of Professions, Independent Higher Education Australia, Independent Tertiary Education Council of Australia, and the Department of Education, Skills and Employment, on issues relating to industry professional accreditation and the future graduate workforce. TEQSA welcomes providers and industry professional bodies contacting us with any information which could help inform our future steps to continue supporting Australia’s higher education sector during COVID-19, addressed to Emily Goode, International and Industry Professional Bodies Manager: emily.goode@teqsa.gov.au.

     

    Professor Nick Saunders AO
    Chief Commissioner and Acting CEO
    Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency 

    Date
    Last updated:
  • TEQSA is seeking to appoint an outstanding CEO

    TEQSA is seeking to appoint an outstanding leader as its Chief Executive Officer. The CEO will provide strategic leadership and vision, and the ethical, effective and efficient management of TEQSA’s large and complex operations. Duties include leadership of the Agency; driving efficient and effective business processes; delivering timely regulatory assessments; and being a recognised authoritative voice on quality assurance and regulation of Australia’s higher education sector.

    The CEO will need to cultivate an effective relationship with the Minister’s Office; provide advice to the Minister on matters relating to the quality and regulation of Australia’s higher education sector in an international context; and foster strategic relationships with key stakeholders including higher education peak bodies, Office of Best Practice Regulation, the Australian Skills Quality Authority, the Productivity Commission, the Department of Education, Skills and Employment and other government agencies.

    This significant leadership appointment requires an individual who is highly regarded for their sectoral and regulatory knowledge; who possesses a respected professional profile, political nous and gravitas; and who demonstrates sound leadership, management, interpersonal and communication skills. It is expected that candidates will offer the skills and capabilities to shape strategic thinking; deliver results; cultivate productive working relationships; and communicate with influence and impact. 

    This full-time statutory appointment is based in Melbourne. Further information on TEQSA can be found on this website. The successful applicant must obtain and maintain an Australian Government Security Clearance to Negative Vetting level 1 status.

    For further information or to obtain the Information for Candidates pack, please contact Paul Hill on +61 (3) 8375 7424 or +61 (0)407 766 756 at Odgers Berndtson, the consultants advising TEQSA. 

    Applications close on Thursday 16 April 2020. Applications should be sent to: CEOTEQSA@odgersberndtson.com.

    Date
    Last updated:
  • Joint TEQSA and ASQA statement relating to flexible delivery

    All AQF training and assessment must meet high quality standards regardless of the location of the student and the mode of delivery.  As long as the student remains enrolled with their provider, and the assessment requirements of the course allow it, the location of the student and the mode of delivery should not form an impediment to attainment of an Australian qualification. 

    National regulators, including ASQA and TEQSA, will be flexible in order to support students to study online either in Australia or offshore. 

    Providers should assure themselves that such arrangements maintain assessment and quality standards, and are appropriately documented. Not all qualifications are suited to online learning, this may include those with mandatory work placements. 

    If providers have questions about their specific circumstances they should contact their relevant regulator.

    Date
    Last updated:
  • TEQSA rejects application to renew registration of Elite Education Institute Pty Ltd

    On 5 February 2020, TEQSA made a decision to reject the applications to renew Elite Education Institute’s registration as a higher education provider and its registration to provide courses to overseas students.  

    TEQSA made this decision based on evidence that Elite Education had failed to meet a number of the requirements of the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2015, and the Education Services for Overseas Students Act 2000 (ESOS Act), which must be met by all higher education providers in Australia.

    This decision comes after TEQSA last year imposed conditions on the provider’s registration, preventing the enrolment or commencement of new students, and due to serious concerns the Agency had identified through an ongoing compliance assessment.

    Anthony McClaran, TEQSA's CEO, commented: “TEQSA’s compliance assessment found a number of issues with Elite’s operations, including inadequate academic quality of course delivery and concerns around academic integrity, and we also found that Elite had delivered courses to overseas students which it was not registered to deliver." 

    “TEQSA’s fundamental role is to protect students and to assure the quality of higher education in Australia. Where providers do not meet the relevant standards, they can expect TEQSA to require improvements and, if we are not satisfied the steps taken are adequate to deliver the quality of education that students expect in Australia, we will act.” 

    “We will now work with the Institute and the Tuition Protection Service to ensure, where possible, all continuing students affected by Elite’s closure are supported to continue their studies at other institutions, and/or are duly refunded monies owed.”

    TEQSA has also imposed four conditions on the registration of Elite Education, to allow for transitional arrangements for students enrolled at Elite Education.

    Elite Education has applied to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal for a review of TEQSA’s decisions and for a stay of those decisions. 

    Media enquiries 

    Michelle Alexander, Assistant Director, Communications: comms@teqsa.gov.au, 0437 143 012

    Date
    Last updated:
  • Guidance note: Academic and research integrity

    Body

    TEQSA’s guidance notes are concise documents designed to provide high-level, principles-based guidance on interpretation and application of specific standards of the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2021. They also draw attention to other interrelated standards and highlight potential risks to compliance. They do not introduce prescriptive obligations.
     

    The definitive instruments that set out providers’ obligations in delivering higher education remain the Threshold Standards (as written by the Higher Education Standards Panel) and the TEQSA Act.
     

    In 2023, TEQSA consulted stakeholders with a draft version of the guidance note about academic and research integrity and considered all feedback.
     

    This guidance note was finalised on 2 February 2024.
     

    The purpose and intent of the guidance note about academic and research integrity is to support providers in ensuring they have the relevant policies, processes, training, oversight, and culture to protect and maintain the integrity of their academia and research.
     

    1. What do academic and research integrity encompass?

    In the context of the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2021, ‘academic integrity’ describes a provider’s responsibility to ensure its staff and students act with honesty, trust, fairness, respect and responsibility as they engage in learning and teaching in courses and units of study. (See TEQSA’s resources on academic integrity).

    Similarly, ‘research integrity’ describes a provider’s responsibility to ensure research is conducted ethically and responsibly and to promote a culture of ethical and responsible research. The Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research 2018 (Responsible Conduct of Research Code) sets out a number of responsibilities and principles that apply to providers and researchers. Responsibilities relevant to providers include:

    • the development and maintenance of current and readily available policies and procedures, which ensure institutional practices are consistent with the principles and responsibilities of the Responsible Conduct of Research Code
    • providing mechanisms to receive concerns or complaints about potential breaches of the Responsible Conduct of Research Code and investigate and resolve potential breaches
    • ensuring breaches are investigated in an effective way in accordance with procedural fairness and the welfare of all parties to an investigation.  

    Breaches of academic integrity, also called ‘academic misconduct’ or ‘academic dishonesty’, can include plagiarism, collusion, contract cheating, recycling work, or fabricating information. (See TEQSA’s resources on academic integrity for more details).

    Breaches of research integrity, also called ‘research misconduct’, can include plagiarism, falsifying or fabricating data, omitting data to manipulate a result or misleading attributions of authorship. The National Statement of Ethical Conduct in Human Research additionally sets out specific breaches including the absence of consent and coercion of participants.

    The primary obligations related to academic and research integrity are found in Standard 5.2 of the Threshold Standards. Standard 5.2 is designed to:

    • uphold and promote academic and research integrity across the sector, including maintaining accountability in third-party arrangements
    • ensure providers have policies and procedures in place to prevent, respond to, and resolve claims of academic and research misconduct.

    Protecting academic and research integrity is important in preserving both a provider’s integrity and the credibility of its qualifications and research. This protection also serves to maintain the reputation and international standing of the Australian higher education system and the benefits of Australian research to individuals and society.

    Therefore, academic and research integrity must remain a priority for all higher education providers, including in ensuring research collaborations with third parties meet the academic and research integrity obligations prescribed in the Threshold Standards (See TEQSA’s guidance note on Delivery with Other Parties).

    Standards 4.1 and 4.2 of the Threshold Standards relating to research and research training are also relevant to academic and research integrity but are only covered here in passing. (See TEQSA’s Guidance Note on Research and Research Training).

    2. What TEQSA will look for

    TEQSA considers the Threshold Standards in the context of academic and research integrity, among which most notably are:
     

    Part A: Standards for higher education providers

    Key considerations

    1.2.2(a)(b): Credit through Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL)

    • the best interests of the student are considered in the granting of RPL
    • granting credit through RPL is subject to maintaining the learning outcomes and integrity of the course of study
    1.3: Orientation and Progression
    • information about key procedures and policies are provided to students during orientation, including those relating to academic research integrity, student grievances and complaints procedures
    2.4.3: Student Grievances and Complaints
    • there are policies and procedures for delivering timely resolution of complaints and appeals against academic decisions, including those about breaches of integrity
    4.1.1(a-e): Research Policy Framework
    • there is a research and research training policy framework consistent with the principles outlined in the Responsible Conduct of Research Code
    • research students participate in an induction which includes an explanation of responsibilities for upholding ethical behaviour and research integrity
    4.2.1(a, b, e, g): Research Training Policy Framework
    4.2.4: Research Training Induction
    5.2.1-4: Academic and Research Integrity
    • there are policies and procedures for promoting and upholding academic and research integrity and addressing misconduct and allegations of misconduct
    • responsible staff are also trained to identify potential academic and research integrity breaches and take appropriate action
    • preventative action is taken to mitigate foreseeable risks and prevent recurrences of breaches
    • students are provided with guidance on:
      • what constitutes a breach of academic or research misconduct
      • penalties associated with academic misconduct and the support services available throughout the disciplinary process
      • the development of good practices in maintaining academic, ethical behaviour and research integrity
    • academic and research integrity is maintained in arrangements with other parties involved in the delivery of higher education and research
    5.3: Monitoring Review and Improvement
    • comprehensive reviews of courses take place to ensure learning outcomes and teaching methods consider emerging trends and developments in the field of education and associated risks, such as developments in artificial intelligence
    • policies and procedures can adapt to emerging trends that impact on the delivery of education, such as artificial intelligence
    • regular interim monitoring takes place to evaluate and guide course improvements to mitigate potential risks to the quality of the education provided
    6.2.1(j): Corporate Monitoring and Accountability
    • the occurrence and nature of breaches of academic or research integrity are monitored, reported and action is taken to address underlying causes
    • there is robust oversight of academic and research integrity, including monitoring potential risks
    6.3.2(d): Academic Governance
    7.2.2(c, d): Information for Prospective and Current Students
    • information regarding student obligations, expected standards of behaviour, disciplinary procedures, academic misconduct, and academic integrity policies are made available to students prior to accepting an offer
    • information systems and records are maintained securely and confidentially, as necessary to prevent unauthorised or fraudulent access to information
    • processes and procedures are in place to document and record responses to allegations and breaches of academic or research integrity
    7.3.3(b, c): Information Management
    Part B: Criteria for higher education providers Key considerations
    B2.5 Criteria for Seeking Self-Accrediting Authority (SAA)
    • providers seeking unlimited SAA must demonstrate mature and advanced processes for the maintenance of academic integrity across at least three (2-digit) fields of education

     

    TEQSA expects a provider to demonstrate it:

    • supplies its staff and students with contemporary and adequate training and has current policies and procedures to support the protection of academic and research integrity
    • ensures its training, policies and procedures evolve to respond to developments in technology, such as the rising prevalence of artificial intelligence
    • applies adequate methods and practices to identify and mitigate risks to academic and research integrity
    • undertakes ongoing monitoring, reporting and recording of breaches of academic or research integrity, and uses this information to continuously improve its practices
    • has robust governance oversight to manage both the individual and root cause of breaches academic or research integrity. 

    Ensuring the above will assist:

    • students in identifying and avoiding potential breaches, as well understanding the potential impacts of breaches
    • staff in detecting, managing and avoiding breaches
    • the broader institution in maintaining its reputation and the reputation of Australian higher education.

    With the increase in online learning and online assessments, providers will ensure they have the knowledge, resources, tools or methods to effectively assure academic and research integrity in all environments. Some tools and methods that may assist providers in assuring integrity may include:

    Category Tools and methods
    Fostering an environment of protecting academic integrity
    • all students and staff complete academic integrity modules early in their career/course of study and receive regular refresher sessions
    • all research students and staff undertake a research integrity module including codes of conduct, research ethics, workplace health and safety, and intellectual property
    • promoting of a mutual understanding between the institution, staff, and students of what constitutes a breach of academic or research integrity, particularly in the online sphere
    • block student access to contract cheating websites (and potentially block proxy websites that allow users to bypass blocks put in place by an internet service provider)
    • co-design of academic/research integrity initiatives with students including student representatives
    • embedding academic integrity and academic artificial intelligence literacy in the curriculum
    Mitigating the risk of academic cheating
    • co-designing assessments with students and other partners
    • using different forms of assessment such as interactive oral assessments, practical and clinical exams, portfolio submissions and other assessments resistant to academic cheating
    • appropriate use of plagiarism, collusion, and appropriate use of technologies that can flag work suspected of academic misconduct for further investigation by staff
    Ensuring staff are appropriately resourced and capable
    • faculty members who are involved in the mentoring and supervision of research students are well resourced and provided training to support their students’ mode of learning
    • up-skilling academic staff in detecting and addressing contract cheating in online and unsupervised assessment tasks
    Establishing strong policy frameworks and reporting mechanisms
    • well-designed policies cover breaches of academic and research integrity in the physical and online environment (e.g. sharing completed assessment tasks on third-party websites, or file-sharing of already graded assignments, or fabricating research data)
    • engaging research integrity advisors who may act as the primary confidential contact for reports of research integrity issues
    • publishing reports on the outcomes of research misconduct investigations
    • reporting how your institution complies with the Responsible Research of Conduct Code

     

    Links to further resources and guidance relevant to protecting academic and research integrity are available on TEQSA’s website: protecting academic integrity and assessments and academic integrity.

    The TEQSA Act

    The Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (TEQSA Act) outlines offences relating to academic cheating services1:

    • Section 114A prohibits the provision of academic cheating services
    • Section 114B prohibits the advertisement of academic cheating services
    • Section 64 also lists as an offence failing to comply with a notice from TEQSA for information or other materials concerning a contravention of section 114A or 114B.

    For both sections 114A and 114B, criminal and civil penalties apply for commercial academic cheating services. Only a civil penalty applies where the academic cheating service is not commercial.

    TEQSA encourages providers to report to TEQSA any academic cheating services it observes through the course of its work. Doing so will support and inform TEQSA’s work in preventing access to these types of services. Academic cheating services can be reported via our website.

    Obligations applying to providers of education to overseas students in Australia

    Where it applies to a provider, TEQSA considers the National Code of Practice for Providers of Education and Training to Overseas Students 2018 (National Code) and the Education Services for Overseas Students Act 2000 (ESOS Act).

    Standards of the National Code relevant to safeguarding academic and research integrity are:

    • 1.3 – providers cannot guarantee a successful education assessment outcome for a student or intended student
    • 8.8 – providers must have policies promoting academic integrity, and processes to address misconduct and allegations of misconduct. 

    3. Identified issues

    Within the context of the Threshold Standards, TEQSA has identified a range of issues that are indicative of risks to academic and research integrity:

    Staff and student training and support

    • no evidence of staff or students being trained about academic integrity
    • staff have inadequate training or support to identify and respond to breaches of academic integrity (including staff delivering higher education via a third party of the provider)
    • students and staff are unaware of how to report, or who to contact about, potential issues with academic or research integrity.

    Governance

    • no evidence of a provider’s governing body taking steps to prevent breaches of academic or research misconduct
    • providers are unable to adequately self-assure courses of study or research collaborations with third parties meet the academic and research integrity obligations prescribed in the Threshold Standards
    • a lack of evidence to show the provider is taking reasonable steps to mitigate the risk of breaches of academic integrity by students e.g., failing to review programs or assessments to ensure students’ learning can be genuinely verified
    • no evidence of the provider creating a holistic culture of protecting academic integrity.

    Policies and procedures

    • lack of clarity in reporting channels for academic or research integrity breaches
    • either no or outdated policies and procedures to prevent, respond to, and resolve academic and research misconduct due to infrequent policy reviews
    • inadequate policies and procedures in place for students to appeal any sanctions resulting from allegations of academic misconduct or research integrity
    • inadequate policies and procedures to protect the anonymity and job security of academic and research misconduct whistle-blowers.

    Information systems and records

    • cyber security concerns regarding the vulnerability to manipulation of student assessment activities, admissions, research activity and outputs, and qualifications records.

    Related resources

    Notes

    1. ‘Academic cheating service’ is defined in section 5 of the TEQSA Act.

    Document information

    Version #

    Date

    Key changes

    1.0

    19 August 2016

    Made available as beta version for consultation

    1.1 11 October 2017 Addition to ‘What will TEQSA look for?” text box
    1.2 28 March 2019 Incorporation of consultation feedback
    2.0 2 February 2024 Major revision
    Subtitle
    Version 2.0
    Stakeholder
    Publication type

    Documents

    tom.hewitt-mcmanus