Before applying for registration as a higher education provider
How to apply for registration as a higher education provider
The government is now operating in accordance with caretaker conventions, pending the outcome of the 2025 federal election.
Applicants should carefully consider whether they meet the following fundamental requirements for registration before applying to become a higher education provider. Applicants should consult with TEQSA before applying to ensure they understand the evidence they will need to submit.
This guidance is intended to be used by applicants to ensure that some of the major shortcomings that commonly arise in applications for registration have been addressed. It is not a summary or restatement of all relevant criteria, standards or matters that we will consider in assessing an application for registration.
Before applying for registration as a higher education provider, applicants should ensure that they are able to demonstrate that:
To apply for registration as an Australian higher education provider, applicants must be:
Under the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011, all applications for registration must be accompanied by an application for accreditation of at least one course of study.
Applications must be on the approved online application form (available from the Provider portal), include all information requested, and be accompanied by the applicable fee and payment/invoice form. See more information on our fees page.
If the application for renewal registration is successful, we will determine the time period of registration. Under the TEQSA Act, this period can’t exceed seven years.
After reviewing the relevant guidance materials, and at least six months before submitting an application, prospective providers should contact new.registration.enquiries@TEQSA.gov.au to advise us of an intention to apply for registration.
There are minimum requirements that all applicants must meet prior to applying for registration as a higher education provider.
For more information on these requirements, visit our Before applying to become a higher education provider page.
TEQSA evaluates applications to register higher education providers against the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2021 (HES Framework).
Visit our Contextual overview of the HES Framework 2021 page for information regarding its context and an introduction to the Standards. More detailed overviews of each of the HES Framework’s Domains can be accessed from our Higher Education Standards Framework 2021 page.
We have produced a number of application guides to assist prospective higher education providers which can be accessed from our Application guides and support page.
To support students in understanding their obligations regarding the use of generative artificial intelligence (gen AI) for learning, studying and assessment, TEQSA has made translations of our Artificial intelligence: advice for students page available.
This webpage, and the associated translations, aim to assist students in understanding how to ethically use gen AI without compromising their academic integrity.
The Artificial intelligence: advice for students page has been translated from English into 7 additional languages. The available translations are in Hindi, Indonesian, Portuguese, Punjabi, Simplified Chinese, Spanish and Vietnamese.
These and other resources, including information on understanding academic integrity and making a complaint about a provider, are available through the Students section of our website.
This Domain (Sections 6.1-6.3) of the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2021 (HES Framework) encompasses:
This Domain represents a collection, at a corporate level, of the provider’s accountabilities, both as a responsible corporate entity and as a provider of quality higher education, including responsibility for compliance with the requirements of the other six Domains of the HES Framework. Some of these accountabilities reside solely with the governing body, although most rely on delegations of authority from the governing body to various parts/officers of the provider.
This Section requires a provider's governing body to be formally established by a legal instrument (e.g. by a specific Act or under the Corporations Act or State Act unless the provider is an individual operating from a Territory). The Standards do not prescribe the model of governance (e.g. Board/CEO or Board/Executive Director) but at least two members of the body must be independent and, consequently, could not be executive directors (the concept of an independent director is elaborated on in the Guidance Note for Corporate Governance).
The Standards require the governing body to exercise governance functions and to hold the organisation accountable, which TEQSA would expect to see reflected in the entity’s instrument of establishment, constitution, a board charter or the like and/or delegated authorities put in place by the governing body. Standard 6.1.3 specifies a number of key governance roles for the governing body. Provided these are carried out as contemplated by the Standard, we would not seek to specify how these roles are undertaken. Notable among these roles is the conduct of periodic independent reviews of the effectiveness of the governing body and the academic governance processes the provider has implemented. For an established provider, we will require reports of these reviews and evidence of improvements arising, or planned to arise, from them. In addition, we will also need to be satisfied that arrangements to meet contingencies including cessation as a provider are available and likely to be effective.
This Section of the Standards specifies a series of critical accountabilities that the provider must be able to demonstrate, and that the governing body, as part of its governance role, must be able to satisfy itself are being met. The governing body should set in place delegated authorities required for effective governance, and TEQSA will review these (including their effectiveness). The governing body must also be able to demonstrate that it has assured itself that these accountabilities are being met as part of its ordinary business, for example, as recorded in its business agendas, confirmed minutes and actions arising such as compliance monitoring, risk management and monitoring of delegated authorities.
Management of risks must include risks to quality. We will expect the provider to be able to demonstrate how the governing body remains abreast of any occurrences of academic misconduct, serious complaints, critical incidents and actual or potential lapses in relation to the HES Framework (see Paragraphs j and k of Standard 6.2.1) through its reporting framework. The evidence required to demonstrate financial viability and the financial capability to meet the Standards and sustain the quality of higher education is detailed in the Application guide for new providers.
This Domain represents the highest level of academic governance oversight mechanisms established by the provider. Neither the Standards nor TEQSA prescribe the structures that may be employed (such as an Academic Board or Senate). However, the outcomes that are to be achieved are specified by the Standards and we will expect a provider to demonstrate that its chosen mechanisms for academic governance achieve these outcomes. A provider’s academic governance systems represent a critical oversight link between the provider’s detailed internal quality assurance arrangements (see Domain 5), the accountability of the governing body for the quality of the higher education it offers and for meeting the requirements of the HES Framework (see Domain 6).
We will expect to see evidence of high level academic oversight (e.g. policy development and review, performance analyses, review findings and actions arising) as contemplated by Standards 6.3.1-6.3.3 as part of the provider’s normal business, including reports and analyses presented to the governing body. A provider’s capacity to maintain effective academic oversight of its higher education activities will be critical to our confidence in the provider and their ability to meet the rest of the Standards.
The following guidance notes can be accessed at our Guidance notes page, or from the links below:
The self-assurance report is an opportunity for you to demonstrate the effectiveness of your institute’s self-assurance mechanisms. The report outlines how your governing body assures itself of the quality of higher education operations and compliance with the Threshold Standards. In particular, it should demonstrate to TEQSA how a provider monitors, manages and mitigates institutional risks.
In preparing your self-assurance report, TEQSA highly recommends demonstrating how your institute manages key sector risks in the following areas:
Overseas student recruitment, admission, and support | TEQSA highly recommends that providers consider TEQSA’s Chief Commissioner’s letter to all providers and TEQSA’s sector alerts in relation to recruitment, admission, and support of overseas students, and provider responsibilities when using education agents. |
---|---|
Student wellbeing and safety, including preventing and responding to gender-based violence and sexual harm | TEQSA highly recommends providers consider the Australian government’s Action Plan Addressing Gender-based Violence in Higher Education, and TEQSA’s notes on preventing and responding to sexual assault and sexual harassment in the Australian higher education sector and wellbeing and safety. |
Threats to academic integrity, including contract cheating and artificial intelligence |
TEQSA highly recommends providers consider TEQSA’s good practice notes on addressing contract cheating to safeguard academic integrity and academic and research integrity, and TEQSA’s resources on artificial intelligence. TEQSA will consider each provider’s response to the Request for information: Addressing the risk of artificial intelligence as part of its assessment. |
Cyber security and foreign interference | TEQSA highly recommends that providers consider the Australian Signals Directorate’s Strategies to mitigate cyber security incidents and TEQSA’s Compliance in focus: Cyber security. |
Staffing arrangements and employment practices, including preventing and responding to wage underpayments and high turnover of academic leaders | TEQSA highly recommends that providers consider TEQSA’s Compliance in focus: Wage underpayments and commentary on HESF Domain 3: Teaching. |
Student grievance and complaints mechanisms, including the quality and accessibility of information on a provider’s website | TEQSA highly recommends that providers consider TEQSA’s guidance note on grievance and complaint handling and commentary on HESF Domain 7: Representation, information and information management. |
In addition, in preparing your self-assurance report, you are expected to self-identify and address any significant risks specific to your institute’s individual circumstances. This should include, but is not limited to, how your institute manages risks associated with:
For further information when preparing your application for renewal of registration, please contact TEQSA’s re-registration team at reregistration.enquiries@teqsa.gov.au.