• Re-accreditation 20 March 2017

    Provider: Melbourne Polytechnic (formerly Northern Melbourne Institute of TAFE)

    Course: Bachelor of Information Technology

    Renewal of course accreditation

    Report on renewal of accreditation of two higher education courses of study offered by Melbourne Polytechnic.

    A delegate of TEQSA has renewed the accreditation, under section 56 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act), of the following higher education courses of study offered by Melbourne Polytechnic for a period of four years from the date of decision:

    • Bachelor of Information Technology
    • Associate Degree of Information Technology

    TEQSA has, under subsection 53(1) of the TEQSA Act, imposed two conditions on the accreditation of the above courses of study.

    Condition 1

    Melbourne Polytechnic must arrange for an independent and external review of student attrition within the Bachelor of Information Technology and the Associate Degree of Information Technology. This external review must include consideration of a possible correlation between student attrition and English language entry requirements. The external review must culminate in a report developed and signed by the independent external reviewer. Melbourne Polytechnic must obtain TEQSA's approval of the reviewer and the review's terms of reference before making an appointment. The report arising from the review must be provided to TEQSA and Melbourne Polytechnic simultaneously and not later than 30 September 2017. Within four weeks of receipt of the report on its attrition Melbourne Polytechnic must provide to TEQSA:

    a) a copy of the minutes of the Academic Board meeting which record the Academic Board's response to the report

    b) a proposed implementation plan to address the recommendations in the report.

    Condition 2

    Melbourne Polytechnic must provide to TEQSA:

    a) a report on its student performance that:

    i. compares and contrasts progression and completion rates and grade distributions at an aggregate level between students enrolled in the revised first year of the courses and the previous cohort. Calculations must be based on the methodology set out within the TEQSA Risk Assessment Framework (Version 2.1).

    ii. identifies actions recommended by the Academic Board in response to student performance and an analysis of the effectiveness of those actions.

    b) evidence by way of meeting minutes that the report has been considered by the relevant Melbourne Polytechnic governing bodies which includes any action in response to the report.

    This report is due to TEQSA by 31 March 2018.

    The course accreditation covers delivery at all Australian sites.

    Main Reasons for the Decision

    TEQSA considers that the decision to apply conditions to Melbourne Polytechnic's application for accreditation of two courses of study is consistent with the basic principles for regulation in Part 2 of the TEQSA Act, as Melbourne Polytechnic is at risk of not complying with a number of the Threshold Standards. TEQSA considers that the risks of non-compliance with the Threshold Standards involve a number of matters that may affect Melbourne Polytechnic's capacity to manage and deliver its higher education awards.

    • The broad issues which relate to the Bachelor of Information Technology and the Associate Degree of Information Technology include:

      a) Provider Course Accreditation Standards (PCAS) 1.2 in relation to the existence of robust internal processes for design and approval of the course of study.

      b) PCAS 2.1 in relation to the overall resourcing of course of study.

      c) PCAS 2.4 in relation to the provision of accurate and current information and advice about the course of study is provided to prospective and current students.

      d) PCAS 3.2 in relation to ensuring admission criteria are designed to ensure that all students admitted are sufficiently competent in the English language to be able to achieve the course learning outcomes.

      e) PCAS 5.5 in relation to benchmarking against similar accredited courses.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Re-accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID0940
  • Re-accreditation 20 March 2017

    Provider: Melbourne Polytechnic (formerly Northern Melbourne Institute of TAFE)

    Course: Associate Degree of Information Technology

    Renewal of course accreditation

    Report on renewal of accreditation of two higher education courses of study offered by Melbourne Polytechnic.

    A delegate of TEQSA has renewed the accreditation, under section 56 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act), of the following higher education courses of study offered by Melbourne Polytechnic for a period of four years from the date of decision:

    • Bachelor of Information Technology
    • Associate Degree of Information Technology

    TEQSA has, under subsection 53(1) of the TEQSA Act, imposed two conditions on the accreditation of the above courses of study.

    Condition 1

    Melbourne Polytechnic must arrange for an independent and external review of student attrition within the Bachelor of Information Technology and the Associate Degree of Information Technology. This external review must include consideration of a possible correlation between student attrition and English language entry requirements. The external review must culminate in a report developed and signed by the independent external reviewer. Melbourne Polytechnic must obtain TEQSA's approval of the reviewer and the review's terms of reference before making an appointment. The report arising from the review must be provided to TEQSA and Melbourne Polytechnic simultaneously and not later than 30 September 2017. Within four weeks of receipt of the report on its attrition Melbourne Polytechnic must provide to TEQSA:

    a) a copy of the minutes of the Academic Board meeting which record the Academic Board's response to the report

    b) a proposed implementation plan to address the recommendations in the report.

    Condition 2

    Melbourne Polytechnic must provide to TEQSA:

    a) a report on its student performance that:

    i. compares and contrasts progression and completion rates and grade distributions at an aggregate level between students enrolled in the revised first year of the courses and the previous cohort. Calculations must be based on the methodology set out within the TEQSA Risk Assessment Framework (Version 2.1).

    ii. identifies actions recommended by the Academic Board in response to student performance and an analysis of the effectiveness of those actions.

    b) evidence by way of meeting minutes that the report has been considered by the relevant Melbourne Polytechnic governing bodies which includes any action in response to the report.

    This report is due to TEQSA by 31 March 2018.

    The course accreditation covers delivery at all Australian sites.

    Main Reasons for the Decision

    TEQSA considers that the decision to apply conditions to Melbourne Polytechnic's application for accreditation of two courses of study is consistent with the basic principles for regulation in Part 2 of the TEQSA Act, as Melbourne Polytechnic is at risk of not complying with a number of the Threshold Standards. TEQSA considers that the risks of non-compliance with the Threshold Standards involve a number of matters that may affect Melbourne Polytechnic's capacity to manage and deliver its higher education awards.

    • The broad issues which relate to the Bachelor of Information Technology and the Associate Degree of Information Technology include:

      a) Provider Course Accreditation Standards (PCAS) 1.2 in relation to the existence of robust internal processes for design and approval of the course of study.

      b) PCAS 2.1 in relation to the overall resourcing of course of study.

      c) PCAS 2.4 in relation to the provision of accurate and current information and advice about the course of study is provided to prospective and current students.

      d) PCAS 3.2 in relation to ensuring admission criteria are designed to ensure that all students admitted are sufficiently competent in the English language to be able to achieve the course learning outcomes.

      e) PCAS 5.5 in relation to benchmarking against similar accredited courses.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Re-accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID0941
  • Re-accreditation 17 February 2017

    Provider: Melbourne Polytechnic (formerly Northern Melbourne Institute of TAFE)

    Course: Associate Degree of Veterinary Nursing

    Renewal of course accreditation

    Report on renewal of accreditation of one higher education course of study offered by Melbourne Polytechnic

    A delegate of TEQSA has renewed the accreditation under section 49 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act), the following higher education course of study offered by Melbourne Polytechnic for a period of seven years until 16 February 2024.

    • Associate Degree of Veterinary Nursing

    Main reasons for decision

    TEQSA has determined that the higher education courses of study submitted by Melbourne Polytechnic for re-accreditation complies with the Provider Course Accreditation Standards and arrangements for delivery at all Australian sites.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Re-accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID0942
  • Revoke-Vary Conditions 27 April 2017

    Provider: William Angliss Institute of TAFE

    Course: Master of Philosophy (Major Thesis)

    Revoke/Vary Conditions

    Report on revocation of condition of accreditation of two higher education courses of study offered by William Angliss Institute

    On 27 April 2017 a delegate of TEQSA revoked under section 53(2) of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act), Condition One imposed on the accreditation of the following higher education courses of study offered by William Angliss Institute (refer public report 30 November 2016):

    • Master of Philosophy (Major Thesis)
    • Master of Philosophy (Praxis and Exegesis)

    The decision to revoke the condition was made on the basis that TEQSA was satisfied that the condition had been met.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Vary/Revoke Conditions
    Decision ID
    ID0944
  • Revoke-Vary Conditions 27 April 2017

    Provider: William Angliss Institute of TAFE

    Course: Master of Philosophy (Praxis and Exegesis)

    Revoke/Vary Conditions

    Report on revocation of condition of accreditation of two higher education courses of study offered by William Angliss Institute

    On 27 April 2017 a delegate of TEQSA revoked under section 53(2) of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act), Condition One imposed on the accreditation of the following higher education courses of study offered by William Angliss Institute (refer public report 30 November 2016):

    • Master of Philosophy (Major Thesis)
    • Master of Philosophy (Praxis and Exegesis)

    The decision to revoke the condition was made on the basis that TEQSA was satisfied that the condition had been met.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Vary/Revoke Conditions
    Decision ID
    ID0945
  • Accreditation 20 November 2013

    Provider: Excelsia University College

    Course: Associate Degree of Dramatic Art

    Course accreditation

    Report on accreditation of one higher education course of study offered by Wesley Institute

    TEQSA has determined, under section 49 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act), to grant accreditation of the following higher education courses of study offered by Wesley Institute for a period of seven years until 20 November 2020:

    • Associate Degree of Dramatic Art

    Background to Decision

    Wesley Institute submitted an application for accreditation of one course of study under Part 4 of the TEQSA Act. Subsection 45(4) of the TEQSA Act requires a registered higher education provider who is not authorised to self-accredit the course of study to apply to TEQSA for accreditation. Subsection 49(6) enables TEQSA to grant accreditation of a course of study for a period not exceeding seven years.

    Main Reasons for the Decision

    TEQSA has determined that the higher education course of study submitted by Wesley Institute for accreditation complies with the Provider Course Accreditation Standards. The course accreditation covers delivery at all Australian sites.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID0837
  • Re-accreditation 18 November 2014

    Provider: Excelsia University College

    Course: Master of Teaching (Primary)

    Renewal of course accreditation

    Report on renewal of accreditation of a higher education course of study offered by Wesley Institute

    TEQSA has determined, under Section 56 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act), to renew accreditation of the following higher education course of study offered by Wesley Institute for a period of seven years until 18 November 2021:

    • Master of Teaching (Primary)

    Background to Decision

    Wesley Institute submitted an application for renewal of accreditation of a course of study under Part 4 of the TEQSA Act. Subsection 45(4) of the TEQSA Act requires a registered higher education provider who is not authorised to self-accredit the course of study to apply to TEQSA for accreditation. Subsection 56(4) enables TEQSA to renew accreditation of a course of study for a period not exceeding seven years.

    Main Reasons for the Decision

    TEQSA has determined that the higher education course of study submitted by Wesley Institute for accreditation complies with the Provider Course Accreditation Standards. The course accreditation covers delivery at all Australian sites.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Re-accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID0838
  • Accreditation 18 November 2014

    Provider: Excelsia University College

    Course: Master of Teaching (Secondary)

    Course accreditation

    Report on accreditation of a higher education course of study offered by Wesley Institute

    TEQSA has determined, under section 49 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act), to grant accreditation of the following higher education course of study offered by Wesley Institute for a period of seven years until 18 November 2021:

    • Master of Teaching (Secondary)

    Background to Decision

    Wesley Institute submitted an application for accreditation of a course of study under Part 4 of the TEQSA Act. Subsection 45(4) of the TEQSA Act requires a registered higher education provider who is not authorised to self-accredit the course of study to apply to TEQSA for accreditation. Subsection 49(6) enables TEQSA to grant accreditation of a course of study for a period not exceeding seven years.

    Main Reasons for the Decision

    TEQSA has determined that the higher education course of study submitted by Wesley Institute for accreditation complies with the Provider Course Accreditation Standards. The course accreditation covers delivery at all Australian sites.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID0839
  • Accreditation 01 March 2016

    Provider: Excelsia University College

    Course: Graduate Diploma of Music

    Course accreditation

    Report on accreditation of one higher education course of study offered by Excelsia College

    A delegate of TEQSA has accredited, under section 49 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act), the following higher education course of study offered by Excelsia College for a period of seven years until 1 March 2023:

    • Graduate Diploma of Music

    Main reasons for decision

    TEQSA has determined that the one higher education courses of study submitted by Excelsia College for accreditation comply with the Provider Course Accreditation Standards and arrangements for delivery at all Australian sites.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID0840