• Re-registration 12 June 2014

    Provider: CG Spectrum Institute Pty Ltd (formerly Banksia Institute Australia Pty Ltd)

    Renewal of registration

    Report on renewal of registration of the Institute for Emotionally Focused Therapy Pty Ltd

    TEQSA has determined, under Section 36(1) of the TEQSA Act, that registration of the Institute for Emotionally Focused Therapy Pty Ltd as a higher education provider be renewed for a period of seven years to 12 June 2021 in the provider category of Higher Education Provider.

    Background to Decision

    The Institute for Emotionally Focused Therapy Pty Ltd submitted an application for renewal of registration in the category of Higher Education Provider under Section 35 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act). Subsection 36(4) of the TEQSA Act enables TEQSA to renew a provider's registration for a period not exceeding seven years.

    Main Reasons for Decision

    As part of the renewal of registration process, TEQSA has assessed the application submitted by the Institute for Emotionally Focused Therapy Pty Ltd against the Threshold Standards.

    The Institute for Emotionally Focused Therapy Pty Ltd has demonstrated to TEQSA that it continues to meet the Threshold Standards.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Re-registration
    Decision ID
    ID1050
  • Re-registration 29 October 2015

    Provider: International College of Management, Sydney Pty. Limited

    Renewal of registration

    Report on renewal of registration of International College of Management, Sydney Pty Ltd

    TEQSA has renewed the registration as a higher education provider, under Section 36(1) of the TEQSA Act, of International College of Management, Sydney Pty Ltd (ICMS) until 4 September 2019 in the provider category of Higher Education Provider.

    TEQSA has, under subsection 32(1) of the TEQSA Act, imposed five conditions on the registration of ICMS as a higher education provider.

    Condition One

    Within three months of being notified of this decision, ICMS is to formulate a revised Academic Board Charter. The revised Charter will prescribe:

    a) the circumstances in which the Academic Board Chair may act on behalf of the Academic Board between meetings of the Board;

    b) actions to be taken in the event that a quorum is not attained at any Academic Board meeting;

    c) the process to be followed in the event that a member of the Academic Board does not, or is not able to attend an Academic Board meeting.

    ICMS must provide TEQSA a copy of the revised Charter within 14 days of the ICMS Governing Body approving the Charter.

    Condition Two

    ICMS is required to:

    A. provide TEQSA, within three months of the date of notification of this decision, with a comprehensive diagnostic analysis of the probable causes for observed rates and trends for student attrition, progression and minimum time completion rates and failure rates, for each accredited higher education course it offers and each year, for the period 2011 to 2014 inclusive. The analysis must include accurate data on student attrition, completion, progression and grade distribution and include analysis by:

    1. entry path (comparing students admitted under each entry pathway);
    2. credit awarded (comparing students admitted with no credit awarded with students admitted with credit for up to a third of the course and between a third and two thirds of the course);
    3. study mode (comparing students who take less than a full-time study load, exactly a full-time study load and greater than a full-time study load, where full-time study load is equal to 36 ICMS credit points in a calendar year);
    4. place of study;
    5. whether students are domestic or international students;
    6. referral to and uptake of student support (including participation in formal study support programs); and
    7. student achievement in similar courses at other higher education providers.

    B. develop and provide to TEQSA by 1 May 2016, a detailed strategy, having regard to the comprehensive diagnostic analysis required under (A) above, which:

    1. includes specific targets for improvement of student attrition, completion and progression rates and failure rates for each course and each year over the forward registration period; and
    2. gives consideration to admission practices and standards, study load of students, the identification of students at risk of not progressing academically and the adequacy and effectiveness of student support.

    C. revise the targets determined in accordance with (B) above if and as directed by TEQSA.

    D. demonstrate improvement, with reference to the targets to be established under (B) and (C), overall and for each course of study, through annually reporting to TEQSA on these rates by 1 July each year (for the rates in the previous calendar year) throughout the period of registration, with these reports to commence on 1 July 2016.

    Condition Three

    Within three months of notification of this decision ICMS must provide TEQSA with:

    A. details of how the policies which ensure staff are appropriately qualified and experienced to teach the course of study have been applied to each member of staff teaching the courses, including:

    1. ICMS's assessment of whether each staff member without a qualification at least one AQF level above the course taught has professional experience which gives the staff member the knowledge, skills and capacity to apply knowledge and skills equivalent to a qualification at least one AQF level above the course taught, and
    2. the support ICMS will provide to each staff member without a qualification at least one AQF level above the course taught to undertake further study or professional development and scholarship in the discipline they teach.

    B. a workforce plan for the next three years. The plan will detail ICMS approach and rationale for the employment of casual staff and will also detail how ICMS ensures that it continues to maintain appropriate human resources to support student learning outcomes. The plan will identify how ICMS will mitigate the risk of casual or sessional staff not being appropriately supported and resourced to provide a continuity of support for students, anchor academic activities, engage in scholarly activities and be active contributing members in a community of scholarship.

    Condition Four

    ICMS is to review its policy on external moderation and the extent to which it has complied with this policy. Within three months of notification of this decision ICMS must provide TEQSA with a copy of the review which is to include findings of the review and an implementation plan, which includes key dates and outcomes of any required changes to the current policy.

    Condition Five

    ICMS must provide TEQSA by 30 June 2016, evidence that demonstrates ICMS benchmarks the academic standards intended to be achieved by students and the standards actually achieved by students in each of the courses of study offered by ICMS against similar accredited courses of study offered by other higher education providers. This evidence is to include details of the courses and institutions selected for comparison and examples of action taken as a result of analysis of the data.

    Main Reasons for Decision

    As part of the renewal of registration process, TEQSA has assessed the application submitted by ICMS against the Threshold Standards. The scope of the assessment included all its Australian sites.

    TEQSA considers that the decision to apply conditions to ICMS's registration is consistent with the basic principles for regulation in Part 2 of the TEQSA Act, as ICMS is at risk of not complying with several the Threshold Standards.

    • The broad issues which relate to the ICMS registration include:

      a) Academic quality assurance and governance

      b) ICMS's assessment of and action taken to mitigate student attrition

      c) Workforce management and staff qualifications

      d) assessment policies

      e) benchmarking of courses

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Re-registration
    Decision ID
    ID1051
  • Renewal of Registration and Renewals of Course Accreditation 12 January 2017

    Provider: Australian Academy of Music and Performing Arts (formerly International Conservatorium of Music (Aust))

    Renewal of registration and renewals of accreditation

    Report on the application for renewal of registration of Australian Academy of Music and Performing Arts

    TEQSA has agreed to orders made by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) under which the registration of Australian Academy of Music and Performing Arts (AMPA), trading as Academy of Music and Performing Arts as a higher education provider will be renewed until 31 December 2020 under subsection 36(1) of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act) in the provider category of 'Higher Education Provider'.

    These orders also involve the imposition of conditions on the registration of AMPA under subsection 32(1) of the TEQSA Act. A copy of the conditions is available at Attachment 1.

    TEQSA has also agreed to orders made by the AAT under which the accreditation of the following courses of study offered by AMPA is renewed until 31 December 2020 under subsection 56(1) of the TEQSA Act:

    • Bachelor of Music (Performance)
    • Associate Degree of Music (Performance)

    Background to Decision

    AMPA applied to TEQSA for registration in the category of Higher Education Provider under Part 3 of the TEQSA Act.

    TEQSA considered AMPA's application and sent AMPA a draft summary of findings with details of the assessment of AMPA's application by the responsible case management team. TEQSA's Commission considered AMPA's response to the draft summary of findings and made a decision on 13 May 2016 not to grant AMPA's application for registration and for the renewal of accreditation of two courses of study, on the basis that the TEQSA Commission was not satisfied that AMPA met the Threshold Standards.

    TEQSA's reasons for not granting AMPA's application included, but were not confined to, TEQSA's lack of satisfaction that AMPA continued to meet:

    • Provider Registration Standards (PRS) 1.5 and 1.6 in relation to provider standing
    • PRS 3.2, 3.4, 3.6 and 3.8, in relation to corporate and academic governance
    • PRS 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3, Provider Course Accreditation Standards (PCAS) 4.1 and 4.2 and Provider Category Standards (PCS) 1.4, in relation to staffing
    • PRS 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4 and 6.5, in relation to grievance procedures and the provision of information and support to students
    • PCAS 1.1, 1.3, 1.7 and 6.1, in relation to design and review of the courses
    • PCAS 3.1 and 3.2, in relation to admission processes for the courses
    • PCAS 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 5.5 and 5.6, in relation to assessment in the courses and student performance.

    AMPA applied for review of TEQSA's decision in the AAT. In the course of the proceedings, AMPA made submissions and provided further information and evidence about the matters raised in TEQSA's decisions.

    TEQSA engaged external experts to review the further material.

    It is well established that absent a specific legislative provision to the contrary, the AAT is generally required to make a decision on review based on the evidence available at the time of the AAT's decision on review, and that the AAT is not confined to the evidence available at the time of the primary decision. Accordingly, TEQSA accepted that the AAT was required to take account of the further material submitted to TEQSA after TEQSA had not granted AMPA's application.

    Main Reasons for Decision

    After reviewing the further material submitted by AMPA and participating in mediation with AMPA, TEQSA was satisfied that AMPA meets the Threshold Standards. However TEQSA considered that there remained risks related to AMPA's capacity to meet the Threshold Standards in the future. On this basis, TEQSA agreed that it was appropriate to substitute TEQSA's initial decision to not grant the application with decisions to register AMPA until 31 December 2020 and to impose a number of conditions on that registration.

    The conditions are designed to address risks against the same Provider Registration Standards, Provider Category Standards, and Provider Course Accreditation Standards listed above in relation to TEQSA's reasons for initially deciding not to grant AMPA's application for renewal of registration. In particular, the conditions are designed to address the risk that changes to AMPA's structure and operations agreed by AMPA and TEQSA might not be fully implemented.

    TEQSA is satisfied that the conditions will provide a framework for TEQSA to oversee the key risks associated with AMPA's corporate and academic governance arrangements and the quality assurance of its higher education operations.

    Attachment 1

    Conditions imposed on the registration of AMPA:

    Condition 1:

    AMPA is required to provide TEQSA with minutes of each meeting of AMPA's Corporate Board and Academic Board, within 21 days after the day on which the relevant meeting occurs, which demonstrate a process consistent with the TEQSA Guidance Notes for the relevant bodies on the matters which were the subject of discussion, and which specify the extent to which the discussion took account of external advice or input; the minutes must be endorsed by the Chair of each body with a certification by the Chair that the governance of AMPA has occurred in a manner consistent with the following:

    a) each member of Australian Academy of Music and Performing Arts (ACN 085 028 351) will execute an authority that the Corporate Board can operate independently at all times and will undertake not to take any action or make any decision that would compromise or potentially compromise the independence of the Corporate Board

    Condition 2:

    AMPA is required to provide a report to TEQSA on AMPA's implementation of its revised admissions process within 6 months after the date of the decision

    Condition 3:

    AMPA is required to provide TEQSA with a report, no later than four weeks prior to the commencement of each teaching period in AMPA's courses, which describes the units to be taught by each staff member (including casual and part-time staff), the relevant qualifications or professional experience of the staff member in relation to those units and the scholarly activities undertaken by the staff member in the preceding six months

    Condition 4:

    by 26 May 2017, AMPA is required to provide TEQSA with a report on the activities undertaken by those individuals engaged to support AMPA's scholarship in the field of Dance

    Condition 5:

    AMPA is required to:

    a) by 31 March 2017, provide TEQSA with a comprehensive diagnostic analysis of the probable causes for observed rates and trends for student attrition, progression and minimum time completion rates, for each accredited higher education course it offers and each year, for the period 2014 to 2016 inclusive; the analysis must include accurate data on student attrition, completion, progression and grade distribution rates and include analysis by:

    i) entry path (comparing students admitted under each entry pathway)

    ii) credit awarded (comparing students admitted with no credit awarded with students admitted with credit for up to a third of the course and between a third and two thirds of the course)

    iii) basis for assessment of the student's English language proficiency

    iv) country of origin

    v) referral to and uptake of student support (including participation in formal study support programs)

    vi) student achievement in similar courses at other higher education providers

    b) develop and provide to TEQSA by 31 May 2017, a detailed strategy, having regard to the comprehensive diagnostic analysis required under paragraph (1) above, which:

    i) includes specific targets for improvement of student attrition, completion and progression rates for each course and each year over the forward registration period

    ii) gives consideration to admission practices and standards, study load of students, the identification of students at risk of not progressing academically and the adequacy and effectiveness of student support

    iii) has been considered and approved by the Applicant's Corporate Board and Academic Board

    c) revise the targets determined in accordance with paragraph (b) above if and as directed by TEQSA

    d) demonstrate improvement, with reference to the targets to be established under paragraphs (b) and (c), overall and for each accredited higher education course of study, through annually reporting to TEQSA on these rates by 28 February each year (for the rates in the previous year) throughout the period of registration, with these reports to commence on 28 February 2018; the reports must be considered and approved by AMPA's Corporate Board and Academic Board and be accompanied by evidence of this approval

    Condition 6:

    AMPA is required to provide TEQSA with reports on the moderation and benchmarking activities, including benchmarking of student performance data, undertaken by the Applicant in the preceding 12 month period; AMPA must provide its first report by 31 May 2017 and a report by 28 February in each subsequent year.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Re-registration
    Decision ID
    ID1052
  • Accreditation 30 August 2017

    Provider: Sheridan College Inc.

    Course: Bachelor of Business

    Course accreditation

    Report on accreditation of one higher education course of study offered by Sheridan College Incorporated

    A delegate of TEQSA has accredited, under section 49 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act), the following higher education course of study offered by Sheridan College Incorporated for a period of seven years until 30 August 2024:

    • Bachelor of Business

    TEQSA has, under subsection 53(1) of the TEQSA Act, imposed one condition on the accreditation of the above course of study.

    Condition 1: Sheridan College must submit to TEQSA by 31 December 2017 the following documents:

    1. Revised course unit listing,
    2. Unit Outlines for any new units developed for delivery in the course, and
    3. Unit Outlines for any units in the course that undergo revision.

    The course accreditation covers delivery at all Australian sites.

    Main reasons for decision

    TEQSA considers that the decision to apply conditions to Sheridan College's application for accreditation of one course of study is consistent with the basic principles for regulation in Part 2 of the TEQSA Act, as Sheridan College is considered at risk of not complying with aspects of the Threshold Standards.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID1302
  • Accreditation 25 October 2017

    Provider: Australian College of the Arts Pty Ltd

    Course: Bachelor of Applied Business (Fashion Marketing)

    Course accreditation

    Report on accreditation of two higher education courses of study offered by The Australian College of the Arts

    A delegate of TEQSA has accredited, under section 49 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act), the following higher education courses of study offered by The Australian College of the Arts (Collarts) for a period of four years until 25 October 2021.

    • Diploma of Applied Business (Fashion Marketing)
    • Bachelor of Applied Business (Fashion Marketing)

    A delegate of TEQSA has imposed, under section 53 of the TEQSA Act, two conditions on the accreditation of the Bachelor of Applied Business (Fashion Marketing):

    Condition 1: Prior to offering a student a place in the Bachelor of Applied Business (Fashion Marketing), Collarts must provide to TEQSA evidence of the appointment of a suitably qualified Program Leader. The appointee must possess:

    1. a qualification in a relevant discipline at least at AQF level 8
    2. demonstrated experience in overseeing the development and coordination of higher education academic programs.

    Condition 2: Not later than four weeks prior to the commencement of each teaching period for the Bachelor of Applied Business (Fashion Marketing), in relation to each staff member at each location proposed to teach one or more units in the course, Collarts must provide TEQSA with:

    1. the name of each staff member intended to deliver each unit in the course
    2. the units proposed to be taught and delivery location
    3. each staff member's qualifications in the discipline of the course being taught
    4. if a staff member does not hold a qualification in a relevant discipline at least one AQF level above the course in which they are teaching, details of the basis on which Collarts determined that the staff member holds professional experience equivalent to such a qualification.

    Main reasons for decision

    The issues which led TEQSA to impose conditions and a shortened period of accreditation are:

    a) This is the first course to be taught by Collarts with a focus on Fashion Marketing.

    b) Whether the numbers, qualifications, experience, expertise and sessional/full-time mix of both academic staff who teach or tutor the course of study, and support staff, are appropriate to the nature, level, and mode of delivery of the course of study and the attainment of expected student learning outcomes.

    c) The extent to which the staff who teach students in the course of study are appropriately qualified in the relevant discipline, and whether they have a sound understanding of current scholarship and/or professional practice in the discipline that they teach.

    TEQSA's assessment considered Collarts' arrangements for delivery at all Australian sites.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID1303
  • Accreditation 25 October 2017

    Provider: Australian College of the Arts Pty Ltd

    Course: Diploma of Applied Business (Fashion Marketing)

    Course accreditation

    Report on accreditation of two higher education courses of study offered by The Australian College of the Arts

    A delegate of TEQSA has accredited, under section 49 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act), the following higher education courses of study offered by The Australian College of the Arts (Collarts) for a period of four years until 25 October 2021.

    • Diploma of Applied Business (Fashion Marketing)
    • Bachelor of Applied Business (Fashion Marketing)

    A delegate of TEQSA has imposed, under section 53 of the TEQSA Act, two conditions on the accreditation of the Bachelor of Applied Business (Fashion Marketing):

    Condition 1: Prior to offering a student a place in the Bachelor of Applied Business (Fashion Marketing), Collarts must provide to TEQSA evidence of the appointment of a suitably qualified Program Leader. The appointee must possess:

    1. a qualification in a relevant discipline at least at AQF level 8
    2. demonstrated experience in overseeing the development and coordination of higher education academic programs.

    Condition 2: Not later than four weeks prior to the commencement of each teaching period for the Bachelor of Applied Business (Fashion Marketing), in relation to each staff member at each location proposed to teach one or more units in the course, Collarts must provide TEQSA with:

    1. the name of each staff member intended to deliver each unit in the course
    2. the units proposed to be taught and delivery location
    3. each staff member's qualifications in the discipline of the course being taught
    4. if a staff member does not hold a qualification in a relevant discipline at least one AQF level above the course in which they are teaching, details of the basis on which Collarts determined that the staff member holds professional experience equivalent to such a qualification.

    Main reasons for decision

    The issues which led TEQSA to impose conditions and a shortened period of accreditation are:

    a) This is the first course to be taught by Collarts with a focus on Fashion Marketing.

    b) Whether the numbers, qualifications, experience, expertise and sessional/full-time mix of both academic staff who teach or tutor the course of study, and support staff, are appropriate to the nature, level, and mode of delivery of the course of study and the attainment of expected student learning outcomes.

    c) The extent to which the staff who teach students in the course of study are appropriately qualified in the relevant discipline, and whether they have a sound understanding of current scholarship and/or professional practice in the discipline that they teach.

    TEQSA's assessment considered Collarts' arrangements for delivery at all Australian sites.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID1304
  • Accreditation 16 October 2017

    Provider: Eastern College Australia Limited (formerly Eastern College Australia Incorporated)

    Course: Master of Education

    Course accreditation

    Report on accreditation of one higher education course of study offered by Eastern College Australia Incorporated

    A delegate of TEQSA has accredited, under section 49 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act), the following higher education course of study offered by Eastern College Australia for a period of seven years until 16 October 2024:

    • Master of Education

    TEQSA has imposed, under section 53 of the TEQSA Act, three conditions on the accreditation of the Master of Education:

    Condition 1

    The Master of Education must be delivered face-to-face (only) until evidence has been provided that the curriculum has been redesigned with appropriate online learning pedagogy, necessary to facilitate student engagement and critical inquiry within a blended learning environment, consistent with the nature and the levels of the units being taught.

    Condition 2

    Prior to commencing delivery of the Master of Education, provide evidence to TEQSA that an additional academic staff member with appropriate qualifications has been employed to teach in the course.

    Condition 3

    Following the first year of benchmarking against a similar accredited course of study, evidence must be provided of the Academic Board's review of benchmarking of the Master of Education, as captured in minutes, demonstrating any action taken to improve academic standards where divergence is identified in comparison with the benchmarking partner.

    Main reasons for the decision

    The issues which led TEQSA to impose the conditions are:

    TEQSA considers that the decision to apply conditions to the Eastern College Australia accreditation of the course of study is consistent with the basic principles for regulation in Part 2 of the TEQSA Act, as Eastern College Australia is at risk of not complying with a number of the Threshold Standards. TEQSA considers that the risks of non-compliance with the Threshold Standards involve a number of matters that may affect Eastern College Australia's capacity to manage and deliver its higher education award.

    • The broad issues that relate to the Master of Education include:

      a) Course Design

      b) Teaching and Learning

      c) Assessment

    TEQSA's assessment considered Eastern College Australia Incorporated's arrangements for delivery at all its Australian sites.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID1305
  • Accreditation 18 October 2017

    Provider: TAFE SA

    Course: Bachelor of Early Childhood Teaching

    Course accreditation

    Report on accreditation of one higher education course of study offered by TAFE SA

    A delegate of TEQSA has accredited, under section 49 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act), the following higher education course of study offered by TAFE SA for a period of seven years until 18 October 2024:

    • Bachelor of Early Childhood Teaching

    TEQSA has imposed, under section 53 of the TEQSA Act, one condition on the accreditation of Bachelor of Early Childhood Teaching.

    Condition 1:

    Prior to marketing the course and enrolling students, TAFE SA must provide to TEQSA, evidence that the course is accredited by the Teacher Registration Board of South Australia (TRB SA).

    Main reasons for the decision

    The issues which led TEQSA to impose the condition are:

    a) PCAS 1.2 requires design and approval processes take account of external standards and requirements, in particular professional accreditation by the relevant accreditation authorities.

    b) There is evidence before TEQSA that TAFE SA has applied to TRB SA and the Australian Children's Education and Care Quality Authority (ACECQA) for accreditation of the Bachelor of Early Childhood Teaching. However there is no evidence before TEQSA that professional accreditation has been granted by either TRB SA or ACECQA.

    c) Until professional accreditation is granted by TRB SA the requirements of PCAS 1.2 are not met.

    TEQSA's assessment considered TAFE SA's arrangements for delivery at all Australian sites and modes of delivery subject to Condition 1.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID1306
  • Accreditation 30 June 2017

    Provider: Melbourne Institute of Technology Pty Ltd

    Course: Bachelor of Engineering Technology (Telecommunications)

    Renewal of course accreditation

    Report on renewal of accreditation of two higher education courses of study offered by Melbourne Institute of Technology

    A delegate of TEQSA has renewed the accreditation, under section 56 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act), of the following higher education courses of study offered by Melbourne Institute of Technology for a period of seven years until 30 June 2024:

    • Bachelor of Engineering Technology (Telecommunications)
    • Master of Engineering (Telecommunications)

    The course accreditation covers delivery at all Australian sites.

    Main Reasons for the Decision

    TEQSA has determined that the two higher education courses of study submitted by Melbourne Institute of Technology for accreditation comply with the Provider Course Accreditation Standards. The course accreditation covers delivery at all Australian sites.

    The Delegate noted that although the courses of study were accredited without conditions, risks have been identified in relation to student attrition and progression.

    The Delegate considered that these risks were adequately dealt with by the imposition of conditions on Melbourne Institute of Technology's registration as a higher education provider which can be viewed on the National Register.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID1307