• Key contacts at TEQSA (for providers)

    TEQSA’s Enquiries Management team (providerenquiries@teqsa.gov.au) is the primary contact for registered higher education providers with TEQSA-related enquiries. However, TEQSA also has specialist contact teams across the agency that are best placed to assist you in a timely and efficient manner when you have a specific enquiry. Please use the following list of key contacts to help direct your enquiry to the most appropriate TEQSA team contacts.

    Nature of enquiry Example enquiries Key Contact
    New application for initial registration Preparing an application for initial registration Email new.registration.enquiries@teqsa.gov.au
    In progress assessments for initial registration and accreditation for prospective providers Enquiring about a submitted application Contact the TEQSA staff member assigned to the assessment. If you are unsure who this is, contact new.registration.enquiries@teqsa.gov.au
    In progress assessments for course accreditation or reaccreditation for existing providers

    Enquiring about a submitted application for:

    • new course accreditation for existing providers
    • renewal of course accreditation.
    Contact the TEQSA staff member assigned to the assessment. If you are unsure who this is, contact assessments@teqsa.gov.au
    CRICOS matters
    • Enquiring about CRICOS or ESOS Act requirements
    • Preparing an application for CRICOS registration or renewal of registration
    • Submitting a CRICOS-related application e.g. to add a course
    • Enquiring about a submitted CRICOS-related notification or application.
    Email CRICOS@teqsa.gov.au
    ELICOS and Foundation Program matters
    • ELICOS or Foundation Program provider enquiries
    • Applying to add an ELICOS or Foundation Program to CRICOS
    • Applying for an exemption to enrol students under the age of 17 in Foundation Programs.
    Email CRICOS@teqsa.gov.au
    Provider registration matters
    Renewal of registration
    Withdraw provider registration
    • Preparing an application for renewal of registration
    • Submitting an application for renewal of registration 
    • Enquiries about renewal of registration applications in progress
    • Requesting an extension to registration period
    • Submitting an application to withdraw registration
    • Enquiries about withdrawing registration
    Email: reregistration.enquiries@teqsa.gov.au
    Self-Accrediting Authority or Provider Category Change
    Self-accrediting authority (SAA) 
    Change provider category 
    • Preparing an application for self-accrediting authority or provider category change
    • Submitting an application for self-accrediting authority or provider category change
    • Enquiries about applications in progress
    Email: reregistration.enquiries@teqsa.gov.au
    Application fees Enquiring about refunds for application fees. Email finance@teqsa.gov.au
    Material changes Submitting a material change notification. Email materialchanges@teqsa.gov.au
    Risk Assessment Framework Enquiring about the risk assessment process. Email risk@teqsa.gov.au
    Provider Information Request (PIR) Enquiring about the PIR. Email collections@teqsa.gov.au
    Sexual assault and sexual harassment guidance Guidance about prevention and response to sexual assault and sexual harassment matters. Email studentwellbeing@teqsa.gov.au
    Compliance matters 

    Enquiring about a compliance matter that TEQSA has notified you about, for instance:

    • a compliance assessment
    • an investigation.
    Contact the TEQSA staff member assigned to the compliance matter. If you are unsure who this is, contact the TEQSA Enquiries Management team (providerenquiries@teqsa.gov.au).
    Complaints about TEQSA Complaints about TEQSA’s practices, services or approach. Email review@teqsa.gov.au

    Preparing an application for:

      

    • Applying for new course accreditation for existing providers
    • Applying for renewal of course accreditation
    • Enquiries about:
      • withdrawing a course/ teach out
      • requesting an extension to accreditation period.
    Email: assessments@teqsa.gov.au
    Conditions

    Enquiries about:

    • conditions imposed on registration or course accreditation
    Email: conditionsundertakings@teqsa.gov.au
    Any other matters, enquiries or guidance Help with the Provider Portal, for example, changing and updating logins. Contact TEQSA’s Enquiries Management team at providerenquiries@teqsa.gov.au

     

    Last updated:
  • Guide to determining the fitness and propriety of a person

    Body

    Documents

    Please note that this guidance will be updated following the end of the caretaker period to reflect amendments to the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Fit and Proper Person Determination 2018 made by the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Fit and Proper Person Determination 2018 – Amendment No. 1 of 2025, which commenced on 5 April 2025.

    Overview

    In 2017, the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the Act) was amended to include a ‘fit and proper person’ requirement at provider registration and renewal of registration, and as an ongoing condition of registration as a higher education provider.

    This requirement is located in the following provisions of the TEQSA Act:

    • Paragraph 21(1)(b) provides that TEQSA may grant an application for registration if it is satisfied that the applicant, and each person who makes or participates in making decisions that affect the whole, or a substantial part, of the applicant’s affairs, is a fit and proper person.
    • Paragraph 36(1)(b) contains an identical provision with respect to renewal of registration.
    • Subsection 25A provides that a registered higher education provider, and each person who makes or participates in making decisions that affect the whole, or a substantial part, of the provider’s affairs, must be a fit and proper person. This is a condition of registration.

    In December 2018, the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Fit and Proper Person Determination 2018 (the Instrument) came into effect. The purpose of the Instrument is to specify matters that TEQSA may have regard to when determining whether a person is fit and proper under paragraph 21(1)(b), subsection 25A and paragraph 36(1)(b) of the Act.

    Section 7A of the Educational Services for Overseas Students Act 2000 (ESOS Act) also specifies matters that TEQSA (as an ESOS agency) must have regard to in deciding whether a provider is fit and proper to be registered for the purposes of the ESOS Act.

    This guidance sets out the principles and considerations that TEQSA will have regard to when assessing fitness and propriety for the purposes of the TEQSA Act.

    What does it mean to be a ‘Fit and Proper Person’?

    ‘Fit and proper person’ is not defined for the purposes of the Act. Read in the context of the Act, TEQSA considers that whether a person is fit and proper should be determined by reference to the person’s character and ability, as well as the likelihood that the person will comply with (or reasonably assist compliance with) the obligations imposed by the Act and the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2015 (Threshold Standards). Whether a body corporate is fit and proper should be determined by reference to the persons through whom the body corporate acts, as well as the body corporate’s own history. These considerations are reflected in the Instrument.

    The objects of the Act include, among other considerations, the protection and enhancement of Australia’s reputation for quality higher education and training services and to protect students undertaking, or proposing to undertake, higher education in Australia by requiring the provision of quality higher education. These considerations underpin TEQSA’s regulatory activities and inform the way in which fitness and propriety is assessed by TEQSA.

    How does TEQSA assess fitness and propriety?

    The evidence that is relevant to whether a person is fit and proper, and the weight that should be afforded to that evidence, will be considered in the circumstances of each case.

    A finding by TEQSA that a person is not a fit and proper person is a serious determination. This could result in the applicant being precluded from registration as a higher education provider or the possibility (if registered) of the registration being cancelled.

    Accordingly, when determining whether a person is fit and proper it is important that TEQSA give due regard to relevant considerations including a person’s:

    1. compliance with the law and provision of information
    2. previous conduct and management history
    3. financial record.

    The above matters can be considered in respect of the person (if an individual), a corporation and any of its officers (if a provider or prospective provider), including its directors, chief executive and managers, or other persons who are involved in making decisions that affect the whole, or a substantial part, of the provider’s affairs.

    Compliance with the law and provision of information

    In determining whether the person is fit and proper, TEQSA considers, amongst other things, whether the person has been convicted of an offence involving dishonesty, fraud, money laundering, theft or any other crime, and whether the person has been ordered to pay a pecuniary penalty. TEQSA also considers whether the person is currently involved in proceedings before a court or tribunal.

    TEQSA will take into account whether the individual presents with a record of any:

    1. criminal convictions
    2. professional denunciations and misconduct
    3. the provision of false or misleading information
    4. disqualification of registration, licence or accreditation.

    Should any of the above be found against the individual being assessed, then the decision maker should take into account additional matters such as:

    1. whether the conduct in question was regarded as relevant to exercising duties required for the registration, licence, authorisation, certification (or equivalent) within the Higher Education Sector
    2. the seriousness of the matter
    3. the length of time that has lapsed since the event occurred
    4. any history of past conduct
    5. any consequences for the applicant or any other person
    6. the implications of the matter—that is, what does it show about the person?
    7. the person’s attitude towards the matter—such as whether the person has learnt, changed and improved their behaviour and is unlikely to further offend in the future.

    Previous conduct and management history

    In determining a person’s fitness and propriety, TEQSA will have regard to a person’s past conduct, previous involvement and management history. This will include but not be limited to:

    1. whether the person has previously been found not to be fit and proper in relation to a relevant act, including those listed in subsection 10(1) of the Instrument
    2. whether the person’s registration to provide higher education courses, accreditation of a course or registration as an RTO under the Act or a State or Territory law has been cancelled, revoked, restricted, not renewed or suspended
    3. whether the person’s registration under the ESOS Act has been cancelled, revoked, restricted, not renewed or suspended
    4. whether the person has had a condition imposed on a registration, approval or arrangement to provide higher education courses, accreditation of a course or registration as an RTO under the Act, ESOS Act or a State or Territory law
    5. whether the person has breached a condition listed at d above
    6. whether the person has been disqualified from managing corporations under Part 2D.6 of the Corporations Act 2001
    7. whether the person has the skills and experience relevant to govern and manage the affairs of a higher education provider
    8. whether the person has the technical knowledge and ability relevant to the specific duties for which they are engaged
    9. whether the person has a sound professional reputation (for example, based on the individual’s professional history and the views of others from the relevant field/s)
    10. whether the person has the confidence of peers, colleagues, clients, and the public at large to not engage in improper conduct in the discharge of their professional duties. This could involve matters that fall short of convictions but call into question the person’s judgement and integrity, such as whether the person represents as legitimate a qualification issued by an institution that is found to issue illegitimate qualifications (i.e. a degree or diploma mill).

    Financial record

    A person’s financial record is an important element in determining their fitness and propriety.

    When assessing the financial record of the individual, TEQSA will generally consider matters such as (but not limited to):

    1. whether there are any indicators that the individual will not be able to meet debts as they fall due
    2. whether relevant solvency requirements are met
    3. whether the individual has been subject to any judgment, debt or award that remains outstanding or has not been satisfied within a reasonable period
    4. whether the individual has made arrangements with creditors, filed for bankruptcy or been adjudged bankrupt or had assets confiscated
    5. whether the individual has been able to provide TEQSA with a satisfactory credit reference.

    Next steps

    If you have queries about TEQSA’s application of the fit and proper person requirements, please contact the TEQSA Enquiries Management team at providerenquiries@teqsa.gov.au for assistance.

    Document information

    IQAF document category External user guide
    Document owner General Counsel, Legal Group
    Review date TBC after 2025 caretaker period
    Version Approved by Brief description of the changes Date approved
    1.0 TEQSA Commission New guidance note for external users 20 August 2020
    1.1 General Counsel Annotation added 8 April 2025
    Stakeholder
    Publication type
  • Application guide for renewing CRICOS registration

    Background

    The application process for renewing CRICOS registration seeks to assure TEQSA that the provider is effectively anticipating, identifying and managing risks to the quality of education, and complying with the Education Services for Overseas Students (ESOS) legislative framework.

    This guide reflects TEQSA’s current process for providers applying to renew their CRICOS registration, under Section 10D of the ESOS Act.

    TEQSA is reviewing our regulatory risk framework. To stay up to date on consultation opportunities and our progress, subscribe to the TEQSA e-News
     

    The below application guide will be updated as our regulatory processes and operations are revised, to align with any revisions of our regulatory risk framework.

    Applications for renewing CRICOS registration have 3 key stages:

    • Stage 1: the provider prepares a CRICOS renewal application
    • Stage 2: TEQSA assesses the application
    • Stage 3: TEQSA decides on the application

    Application guide

    Further information

    For more information or assistance applying to renew CRICOS registration, please email the CRICOS team.

    Last updated:
  • CRICOS renewal assessment scope

    Legislative framework

    In assessing CRICOS renewal applications, TEQSA is guided by the Education Services for Overseas Students Act 2000 (ESOS Act) and the National Code of Practice for Providers of Education and Training to Overseas Students 2018 (National Code 2018).

    Area of assessment Relevant legislation
    Student recruitment and admission
    • Sections 19 and 21 of the ESOS Act
    • Standards 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.1, 7 and 8 of the National Code 2018
    Student participation, support and experience
    • Standards 5, 6, 10 and 11 of the National Code 2018
    Student attainment
    • Standards 2.3, 8 and 9.3.3 of the National Code 2018

    How TEQSA assures compliance

    TEQSA is assured a provider is compliant with the ESOS Act and National Code when institutional and quality assurance processes indicate:

    • periodic monitoring, review and improvement processes are in place to actively ensure the:
      • integrity of recruitment and admission of overseas students
      • availability of sufficient support for overseas students
      • integrity of student progress and attainment
    • peak corporate and academic governance bodies are informed of, monitor and act on risks to overseas students
    • the provider will continue to comply with the ESOS Act and National Code as demonstrated by current governance and internal quality assurance processes and the extent of compliance with the selected Standards.

    If our assessment identifies unmitigated risks to the quality of education or overseas students, which affect Standards that are beyond the assessment’s scope, we’ll consider our regulatory response. Any response we make will be proportionate to the risks and tailored to the specific circumstances.

    If more information is needed or the scope of our assessment needs to change, we will reach out and provide an opportunity to supply additional details and address our concerns.

    More information about how we regulate is available on our website.

    Last updated:
  • Assessment and decisions for CRICOS registration renewal (Stages 2 and 3)

    Stage 2: TEQSA assesses the application

    Once all required evidence is received, we begin our assessment. During the assessment, we look at the evidence to determine current and ongoing compliance with all requirements of the ESOS Act, the National Code and any other relevant legislation within the ESOS Framework.

    If we identify any areas where your application is not compliant with legislative requirements, or is at risk of non-compliance, we will contact you. You will be given an opportunity to respond to our concerns and submit additional or revised evidence to demonstrate compliance, usually within 28 days.

    Stage 3: TEQSA decides on the application

    TEQSA may approve or reject your application for CRICOS renewal. In doing so, we will notify you, in writing, of our decision and the reasons for the decision.

    If TEQSA approves the application, we may decide to approve a period of registration less than the maximum 7 years. TEQSA may also decide to impose conditions on registration to manage any risks that have not been fully addressed in your institution’s application.

    If TEQSA decides to reject the application, or if you are dissatisfied with our decision, you may seek a review. Information on  your options for seeking a review of TEQSA decisions is available on our website.

    Last updated:
  • How to apply to renew CRICOS registration

    Under the Education Services for Overseas Students Act 2000 (ESOS Act), TEQSA is the ESOS agency for:

    • all higher education providers registered under the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (TEQSA Act)
    • English Language Intensive Course for Overseas Students (ELICOS) courses delivered by, or in entry arrangements with, registered higher education providers
    • all providers of Foundation Programs.

    Institutions must be registered on the Commonwealth Register of Institutions and Courses for Overseas Students (CRICOS) to enrol and deliver education services to students who are in Australia on a student visa.

    TEQSA registers providers on CRICOS for a specific period, up to a maximum of 7 years. Registration periods are recorded in PRISMS under the ‘Summary’ tab.

    Applications to renew CRICOS registration can be made using the form in TEQSA’s provider portal.

    Providers must make a CRICOS renewal of registration application at least 90 days before their current registration period lapses.

    Application timeframes for CRICOS renewal are specified by TEQSA through a legislative instrument, as per section 10D of the ESOS Act. Providers can request a shorter application period by emailing the CRICOS team.

    Providers with ELICOS or Foundation Programs, or an exemption to enrol students under the age of 17 in Foundation Programs, will need to apply for renewal of these course accreditations and exemptions as part of their CRICOS registration renewal. The application guide for renewing CRICOS registration provides more information.

    Once a renewal application is submitted CRICOS registration remains active, with no restrictions in place, until TEQSA makes a decision.

    Processing times

    To support TEQSA in assessing applications as promptly as possible, we encourage providers to check they have included all required information to make a decision.

    While TEQSA endeavours to complete assessments as efficiently as possible, assessment times can vary considerably. Factors which impact assessment times include:

    • application quality and completeness
    • risks identified by TEQSA and complexity of the assessment
    • the volume of applications TEQSA is assessing.

    As part of the assessment, TEQSA may request additional or revised evidence, if the application is incomplete or if instances of or risks of non-compliance are identified. If this occurs, TEQSA will let the applicant know what is missing and when it needs to be submitted.

    Key stages

    Applications for renewing CRICOS registration have 3 key stages:

    • Stage 1: the provider prepares a CRICOS renewal application
    • Stage 2: TEQSA assesses the application
    • Stage 3: TEQSA decides on the application

    Application guidance

    Before starting an application, TEQSA encourages providers to read the application guide for renewing CRICOS registration. This guide supports providers by:

    • explaining the process
    • outlining what evidence and documents are required
    • providing guidance on preparation.

    Further information

    For more information, or assistance with your application, please email the CRICOS team.  
     

    Last updated:
  • Application guide for renewal of registration

    Body

     

    Background

    Purpose

    This guide reflects TEQSA’s current process for all registered higher education providers to follow when applying for renewal of registration.

    We are undertaking a review of our regulatory risk framework that will inform the evolution of TEQSA’s regulatory approach. This will ensure regulatory efforts are aligned with the most critical risks that require regulatory intervention, allowing TEQSA to most effectively prioritise our resources and regulatory activities. We will engage in wider consultation with the sector about a revised regulatory risk framework in 2024.

    The best way to stay informed about consultation opportunities and updates about our approach to regulatory risk is to sign up to our monthly TEQSA e-News update.

    This guide will be updated as we further align our regulatory processes and operations to a revised regulatory risk framework.

    Overview

    Stage 1 Prepare your application
    TEQSA will publish the evidence requirements for all renewal of registration applications on its website. Providers are encouraged to review the resources published guides and guidance notes in preparing their application. 
    Stage 2 Submit your application
    The application must be in the approved form and accompanied by the required evidence and the relevant application fee.
    Stage 3 Application is assessed by TEQSA
    TEQSA’s assessment team assesses the application and documents their findings. This stage may involve TEQSA making additional requests for information.
    Stage 4 Findings and recommendations
    The assessment team makes recommendations to the TEQSA Commission. Where TEQSA is not satisfied that a provider meets all requirements of the Threshold Standards, draft findings will be sent to the applicant for response.
    Stage 5 Application is decided by the TEQSA Commission
    TEQSA notifies the applicant of the outcome.
    Stage 6 Decision is published on the National Register

    Stage 1: Prepare your application

    In preparing your application, TEQSA highly recommends that you closely review the requirements of the Tertiary Educations Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (TEQSA Act) and the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2021 to understand your obligations. Your application should demonstrate how you meet, and continue to meet, each of these obligations.

    TEQSA has recently revised its approach to the evidence it requires for renewal of registration applications. Our intention is to reduce the required volume and scope of evidence, such that a detailed and comprehensive self-assurance report, together with detailed and comprehensive independent governance reviews, and key documents relating to institutional risk management, will be sufficient to demonstrate compliance with the Threshold Standards.

    Applications for renewal of registration should include the following evidence:

    • a written submission outlining how the provider’s governing body assures itself of the quality of its higher education operations and that it is continuing to meet the Threshold Standards (self-assurance report) and an index listing any supporting evidence referenced throughout the report (index)
    • reports of the most recent independent reviews of the effectiveness of the provider’s governing body and its academic governance processes, as well as planned and completed actions arising from these reviews (governance reviews)
    • evidence of risk identification, management, and mitigation, including a risk register, and any relevant plans, policies, procedures, and frameworks (risk management)

    In addition, providers registered in the Australian University category should submit the following evidence:

    • a written submission describing how the governing body assures itself it is meeting, and will continue to meet, the standards of research for Australian Universities (research requirements)

    Lastly, any provider with a high risk to financial position, as determined by TEQSA’s most recent Provider Risk Assessment, should submit the following evidence:

    • financial projections, statements, and supporting evidence demonstrating financial viability and sustainability (financial evidence)

    We ask that providers only submit the documents requested above, and that any additional supporting evidence is listed in the index and made available to TEQSA only if requested.

    Self-assurance report

    The self-assurance report is a written submission of no more than 10 pages. It focuses on the function of a provider’s governing bodies, noting their fundamental importance to the provider’s operations, including their accountability for the quality of education delivered, their compliance with the Threshold Standards and other legislative requirements.

    We appreciate the nature of risk and the institutional responses to manage risk may vary for each provider, according to the context in which it is operating.

    The self-assurance report should:

    • describe reporting and review activities and outputs that are part of regular, internal governance and quality assurance cycles for the provider, including the boards’ systems for delegating authority and for reviewing those delegations
    • demonstrate how the provider is operating effectively and sustainably (as set out in Standard 6.2.1)
    • show the provider’s corporate governing body is sufficiently well-informed to identify and address material risks to its viability, sustainability and educational offerings (Standard 6.1.3-4)
    • describe the provider’s institutional framework and processes for academic governance (Standard 6.3) and provide evidence of how its peak body assures itself of the effectiveness of its processes for course approval (Standard 5.1.2) and its ongoing monitoring, review and improvement activities that ensure the quality of education being delivered (Standard 5.3.7)
    • synthesise and refer to supporting evidence that demonstrates the claims put forward
    • be accompanied by an index listing the supporting evidence that the applicant would be able to provide to TEQSA on request.

    The report should demonstrate the effectiveness of a provider’s self-assurance processes as an integral part of their day-to-day operations. In preparing the report, providers should consider the key sector-wide issues that pose significant institutional risk. We encourage all providers to review the key considerations for providers preparing a self-assurance report (renewal of registration).

    Governance reviews

    The Threshold Standards require all providers to undertake periodic independent reviews of the effectiveness of both the governing body and its academic governance processes. The scope of the governance review should include the extent to which the governing bodies fulfil the range of responsibilities outlined in Standards 6.1.3, 6.2 and 6.3.

    TEQSA encourages providers undertaking governance reviews to view them primarily as an opportunity to have an independent person or persons of significant expertise evaluate the effectiveness of their own governance and mechanisms for self-assurance, and to support the continuous improvement of their organisation.

    A review of this nature will provide much better institutional value than a review that is commissioned and conducted for more narrow purposes, such as to produce a report to be submitted with a TEQSA application.

    An external review of governance is an important exercise in testing both the operation of governance mechanisms and the consideration of previous perspectives that may have been sought by a provider. In this regard TEQSA expects careful reflection on the scope of the reviews and the qualifications and experience of those undertaking the reviews. We particularly emphasise the value of seeking diverse perspectives from a range of external reviewers.

    TEQSA recommends the independent reviews are undertaken in the second half of a provider’s registration period. This ensures the reviews can be relied upon to provide a contemporary evaluation of the effectiveness of governance processes when submitted as evidence for renewal of registration. We encourage providers to consider TEQSA’s guidance to providers about engaging an independent expert to undertake a review.

    Planning reviews to occur well in advance of the re-registration application will enable you to provide evidence demonstrating the implementation of actions and improvements in response to the review.

    TEQSA expects the evidence submitted with the renewal of registration application will also include the provider’s consideration and response to the findings and recommendations of the reviews. This typically takes the form of a detailed action plan that sets out actions, timeframes and accountabilities.

    In considering governance reviews in the context of a re-registration assessment, we look for the following characteristics:

    • reviewers:
      • have an independent perspective
      • are competent to undertake the review including having relevant qualifications, experience and expertise.
    • reports:
      • make findings against the governance standards (Domain 6) of the Threshold Standards
      • are based on sufficient scope and quality of evidence
      • take an evaluative approach, addressing strengths, opportunities for improvement and key risks
      • where practicable, provide an opinion on the provider’s improvement plans, capacity and progress.
    • action plans:
      • respond to recommendations made by the review
      • include a timeline for implementation, with clear accountabilities
      • include mechanisms for monitoring the progress and effectiveness of any actions taken.

    Wherever the governance review report(s) cover the full scope of the Threshold Standards requirements for corporate governance, corporate monitoring and accountability and academic governance, TEQSA will not need to seek additional evidence on these areas. Conversely, if some of these areas are not covered in the external reviewer’s report, we may need to seek additional information and evidence.

    Risk management

    Providers should be able to demonstrate how its corporate governing body assures itself that risks to higher education operations have been identified and material risks are being managed and mitigated effectively. As part of your submission, TEQSA seeks evidence of how risk is identified and monitored, the measures that are implemented to manage and mitigate key risks, and how oversight of risk is maintained at an institutional level by the governing body.

    Research requirements for universities

    TEQSA requires all universities to provide a written submission of no more than 5 pages evidencing their governing body’s oversight of research quality, having regard to the standard of research set out in Criteria B1.3.16-19 of the Threshold Standards. Where relevant, this may involve a university addressing its preparedness to meet research standards in the future, noting the transitional arrangements for research requirements for providers registered in this category that are set out in Criteria B1.3.16-19 and in B3.2. We provide further guidance on this topic on our website: Research requirements for universities.

    Financial evidence for providers with high risk to financial position

    Each year, TEQSA conducts a risk assessment of each provider, assessing risks to students and to the provider’s financial position. If TEQSA has rated the risk to financial position as high in its most recent Provider Risk Assessment, TEQSA requires additional evidence from providers applying for renewal of registration. This evidence should demonstrate how the provider monitors, manages, and reports on financial performance, including setting performance targets and taking corrective action to address underperformance. Please submit:

    • overview of governance and accountability framework, including organisational charts of corporate structure (in the case of subsidiaries of corporate groups) and governance structure
    • financial projections for the next 5 years, including:
      • a completed financial forecast with data for the next 5 years, completed as per the instructions in the template
      • marketing plan, strategic and business plans (with Year 1 as the first year of the renewed registration), supported by detailed assumptions, and evidence of approval of the plans by the governing body.
    • financial results, including:
      • audited financial statements for the three most recent financial years (or all available years if the institute has been operating for less than three financial years). If the most recent financial statement is more than six months old, then board approved management accounts for the last six months must be attached
      • actual versus budget reports for income statement, balance sheet, cash flow statement and EFTSL projections for the three most recent financial years
      • all funding arrangement currently in place, or to be pursued in the future (e.g. banking overdrafts, contingency funding, shareholder funding or changes to the corporate structure, letter of support, loan agreements)
      • last 12 months of bank statements for each account held
      • if there is a parent entity: Audited financial statements for the three most recent financial years / all years available if applicant has been operating for less than three financial years
      • budget for the financial year when the re-registration application is submitted, and the board approved management accounts for the financial year to date (showing actual to budget for profit and loss, balance sheet and cash flow)
      • the plan to address financial management, viability and sustainability issues, as presented to, and approved by, the governing body.
    • a description of the processes to ensure maintenance of prudent financial control, and detection and prevention of any fraud and mismanagement within its higher education operations.

    Concurrent assessments

    If you are considering applying for self-accrediting authority (SAA) or to change provider category, we highly encourage submitting these concurrently with your application to renew provider registration, where this is practicable. Significant parts of the evidence provided in a renewal of registration application, particularly those parts relating to academic governance and quality assurance processes, are relevant to the criteria for both SAA and provider categories. As such, submitting these applications concurrently involves a reduced application fee compared to making these applications separately. It may also reduce the time spent preparing these applications.

    We strongly encourage providers to contact the reregistration team at reregistration.enquiries@teqsa.gov.au as early as possible to discuss the best way of packaging applications for concurrent assessment.

    Our application guide for self-accrediting authority sets out the process for applying for SAA and provides contextual information about TEQSA’s assessment of these applications.

    Stage 2: Submit your application

    Submitting your application

    Section 35 of the TEQSA Act requires that an application for renewal of registration is to be made in the approved format, including any information, documents and assistance that TEQSA requests, and be accompanied by the relevant fee.

    The TEQSA Act also requires that the application be submitted to TEQSA at least 180 calendar days before the current registration period is due to end. If you cannot apply by this date, you should contact TEQSA as early as possible at reregistration.enquiries@teqsa.gov.au. Any decision to approve a submission after this date is made at TEQSA’s discretion.

    The re-registration application form is in the provider portal. Please visit our website for more information about accessing and submitting an application using the TEQSA provider portal.

    We expect that most of the evidence you are referencing will be existing documents that have been produced and used for internal purposes. We encourage you to use URLs and hyperlinks for information that TEQSA can access from your website. If you are referencing documents that you have already submitted to TEQSA, please identify where this is the case. It will generally be unnecessary to submit these documents again. Please use the naming conventions described in TEQSA’s guide on naming conventions for evidence.

    When your application is ready, submit it to TEQSA via the provider portal. Be sure to include:

    • all required information and evidence
    • a signed declaration. 

    Providing false or misleading information in an application is a serious offence under the TEQSA Act.

    Payment of assessment fees

    After you submit your application, you will receive an invoice as final confirmation of your application and request for payment. TEQSA does not have an online payment facility.

    The application fee for a renewal of registration is set out on TEQSA’s website. Please note, if TEQSA identifies significant risks that have not been adequately addressed in a provider’s application, TEQSA may elect to commence a compliance assessment. In line with TEQSA’s Cost Recovery Implementation Statement, this would be at a cost to the provider and reflects the additional work effort required by TEQSA.

    Your application is considered valid when you have used the approved application form and paid the application fee specified on the invoice. TEQSA will only commence assessing your application after it has been submitted and the fee has been paid.

    Application fees do not attract GST. TEQSA’s ABN is 50 658 250 012.

    Once a provider makes a valid application to renew its registration, its registration continues until TEQSA decides whether to renew the provider’s registration, as provided by Section 36(3) of the TEQSA Act. The provider’s registration status on the National Register will state ‘ongoing, pending renewal’ until such time TEQSA makes its decision on the application.

    Stage 3: Application is assessed by TEQSA

    Applications for renewal of registration are considered under Part 3, Division 3 of the TEQSA Act. TEQSA may renew a provider’s registration if we are satisfied the provider continues to meet the Threshold Standards.

    Enquiries and requests for further information

    TEQSA assesses whether the application and supporting evidence submitted confirms the provider continues to meet the Threshold Standards. We may request further information as questions arise. For example, you may be asked to provide evidence from your index, address apparent gaps in your evidence, or clarify aspects of your evidence, or explain how certain policies and procedures are implemented in practice. TEQSA will ask you to respond to requests for information online, through a request created in the provider portal which is referenced as an ‘REQ’.

    TEQSA has specialist contact teams across the agency that are best placed to assist you in a timely and efficient manner when you have a specific enquiry about one of our functions. For enquiries relating to renewal of registration applications, please contact us at reregistration.enquiries@teqsa.gov.au. For other assistance, please access our key contacts at TEQSA page to help direct your enquiry to the most appropriate TEQSA team contacts.

    Site visits

    TEQSA may visit one or more of your delivery sites or headquarters if required. We may conduct these virtually or in-person. At this visit, TEQSA may, for example, inspect facilities, equipment and resources, or clarify how relevant procedures, policies and operations are implemented through interviews with key personnel.

    Site visits are another way of collecting evidence, and we will use observations and discussions held during a site visit in our assessment and decision-making to supplement or validate your written evidence. At the provider visit, TEQSA may interview various groups including students, staff, and members of corporate and academic boards.

    Assessment timeframes

    TEQSA’s assessment timeframes are subject to a range of factors that can affect the time taken to make our assessments, including:

    • the regulatory history of an existing provider, including the outcomes of previous assessments relevant to the application
    • the strength and relevance of evidence presented by the applicant
    • the risk of non-compliance with the Threshold Standards and the ability of the provider to demonstrate it has mitigated those risks
    • the time taken by the provider to respond effectively to requests for information
    • the level of resourcing available to TEQSA.

    Stage 4: Findings and recommendations

    If TEQSA’s re-registration assessment team is satisfied that a provider meets the registration requirements, it will recommend that TEQSA’s Commission approve the application. In cases where TEQSA has significant concerns about a provider, these will be set out to the provider who will be afforded the opportunity to respond.

    In rare instances, the re-registration assessment team will recommend the TEQSA Commission reject an application. In these instances, TEQSA will advise the applicant of the proposed decision and specify the reasons. Our obligations in this regard are set out in s36(5) of the TEQSA Act. The applicant will be afforded an opportunity to comment and provide further information with respect to the proposed decision. TEQSA will set out our concerns and the reasons why rejection would confirm with the basic principles for regulation. We may also send you any evidence that is relevant to the proposed decision that you may not have previously seen, such as reports from external experts used by TEQSA.

    TEQSA’s approach to this stage of the process will vary according to the nature of the issues identified.

    Where TEQSA is proposing to reject an application where the applicant is registered in a university provider category, we are required to give opportunities to make representations to the provider and to the Minister for each relevant state and territory responsible for higher education.

    The assessment team will then review any information provided by the applicant and any other relevant entities before presenting the report to the TEQSA Commission.

    Stage 5: Application is decided by the TEQSA Commission

    The TEQSA Commission considers the recommendations made by the re-registration assessment team. In reaching a decision, the TEQSA Commission will have regard to the 3 basic principles for regulation set out in Part 2 of the TEQSA Act. These are regulatory necessity, reflecting risk, and proportionate regulation.

    The TEQSA Commission may decide to:

    • approve the application for the maximum registration period
    • approve the application for a shortened period and/or impose conditions on the renewal of registration
      or
    • reject the application.

    When considering whether to approve a shortened period of registration, to impose conditions, or to reject the application, the TEQSA Commission will consider any representations made by the applicant in response to the proposed decision.

    When it is considering a decision to reject an application made by an applicant registered in a university provider category, the TEQSA Commission must consider any representations made by relevant entities in response to the proposed decision.

    Notifying you of the decision

    TEQSA will send you a Notice of Decision within 30 calendar days of making a decision to grant or reject your application. The notice will include the details of any conditions placed on your renewal of registration.

    In some cases, we may also request further information and/or may notify you of areas that may be explored further in future regulatory processes. TEQSA may also make observations or recommendations about areas for improvement to support quality enhancement.

    If your application has been rejected, or if conditions have been imposed on your renewal of registration, the Notice of Decision will be accompanied by a statement of reasons.

    Our obligations with respect to notifying providers of our decisions about renewal of registration are set out in s37 of the TEQSA Act.

    Review of decisions

    Certain decisions made by TEQSA are reviewable. Please refer to our website for more information about reviews of TEQSA decisions.

    Stage 6: Decision is published on the National Register

    Public report

    TEQSA normally publishes reports of all decisions about provider registration and course accreditation to facilitate transparency of our processes, regulatory decisions and the reasons for those decisions.

    A public report contains our decision and the reasons for the decision. This report is published on the National Register after TEQSA has considered any feedback you may have given on a draft version provided to you.

    Refer to TEQSA’s policy about public statements on TEQSA’s regulatory decisions and processes for more information on our approach.

    Updating the National Register

    Where an application for renewal of registration has been approved, the relevant entry on the National Register will be updated. Where conditions are imposed on the renewal of registration of a provider, details of those conditions will also be published.

    Confidentiality and accuracy of information

    TEQSA has statutory obligations in relation to confidentiality however, we operate within a public accountability framework. Where a higher education provider considers that its information should be treated as confidential by TEQSA, the provider should contact us before providing the information. For more information, see our approach to confidential information.
     

    Document information

    Version # Date Key changes
    1.0    
    1.1 2 June 2014  
    2.0 13 April 2016  Updated for the HESF 2015 and made available as beta version for consultation. 
    2.1 27 September 2016  Evidence table updated and feedback from consultation incorporated. 
     
    2.2 7 October 2016  Cross reference to Part B1 of the HES Framework added to the Notes of Appendix A.
    2.3 3 November 2016 Appendix A updated.  
     
    2.4 20 January 2017 Wording updated to reflect HESF 2015 now in effect, references to the Confirmed Evidence Table for Renewal of Registration added, and minor clarifications made in relation to Guidance Note on Naming Conventions for Evidence. 
    2.5 18 April 2017 Extension to scope (Section 1.3) updated for situations where student teachers are being placed into schools or the provider has responsibility for students under the age of 18.  
    2.6 3 May 2017  Standard 7.1.4 updated in Table 1 to reflect that it is only if applicable. 
    2.7 29 August 2018  Update to Table 1 in Appendix A; Standards 2.3.1-5 are now included in the core assessment scope, and all of the indicative evidence requirements for Domain 2 - Learning Environment have been updated accordingly.  
     
    3.0 25 October 2023 Update reference to Threshold Standards. Updated to reflect changes to TEQSA’s assessment processes. 
    3.1 6 August 2024 Updated to reflect changes to TEQSA’s assessment processes

     

    Subtitle
    Version 3.1: Effective from 6 August 2024
    Stakeholder
    Publication type
  • Extensions to the period of provider registration or course accreditation policy

    Body

    Purpose

    The purpose of this policy is to describe TEQSA’s approach to considering extensions to the period of provider registration or course accreditation under sections 37A and 57A of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act). 

    Legislative authority

    Section 37A of the TEQSA Act provides that TEQSA may extend the period of a registered higher education provider’s registration. The extended period may exceed seven years.

    Section 57A of the TEQSA Act provides that TEQSA may extend the period of the accreditation of a course of study. The extended period may exceed seven years.

    Principles

    1. TEQSA may consider extending the period of a provider’s registration or the period of accreditation of a course of study for a range of reasons. These include:
      1. to reflect an established track record of low-risk, high quality delivery of higher education, either across a provider’s operations or with respect to one or more courses
      2. to harmonise periods of registration and accreditation, or harmonise periods of registration under the TEQSA Act and another act (such as the Education Services for Overseas Students Act 2000)
      3. to provide for efficient management of TEQSA’s workload.
    2. Relevant matters when considering a possible extension under section 37A or section 57A include, but are not limited to, the following:
      1. the provider’s history, including the history of its scholarship, teaching, research, students’ experiences, financial status and capacity, and compliance with the Higher Education Standards Framework, TEQSA Act and other laws regulating higher education
      2. matters relevant to the risk of the provider not complying with the Higher Education Standards Framework or the TEQSA Act in the future, including its internal quality assurance mechanisms and its financial status and capacity
      3. any material risks to students or quality identified in the risk assessments for the provider
      4. the quality of data submitted by the provider as part of TEQSA or other Australian Government information collection processes
      5. TEQSA’s anticipated workload during the period when the provider’s registration or course accreditation is due to expire
      6. the period of any other registration or accreditation of the provider (including registration under the Education Services for Overseas Students Act 2000 or the National Vocational Education and Training Regulator Act 2011), and the extent to which harmonisation of the expiry dates of registration or accreditation would benefit the provider
      7. any relevant comments or evidence from the provider
      8. any relevant comments or evidence from other agencies, including (but not limited to) the Department of Education, Skills and Employment and the Australian Skills Quality Authority
      9. the need for any decision, and the process leading to any decision, to be appropriate, fair, objective, and defensible. 
    3. The TEQSA Act does not limit the period for which a provider’s registration or course accreditation may be extended. With this in mind, TEQSA will usually extend registration or accreditation for a period no longer than seven years, to provide an appropriate opportunity for a scheduled review of the provider or a particular course. Further, in circumstances where a short extension is being considered (up to 12 months), it may be more appropriate to first consider allowing a provider to submit its application for renewal at a date later than the usual 180 days prior to expiry – this would allow an extension to be considered closer to the expiry date if it becomes necessary.

    Contact

    For enquiries about extensions to:

    If in doubt, contact TEQSA’s Enquiries Management team at providerenquiries@teqsa.gov.au.

    Stakeholder
    Publication type

    Documents

    tom.hewitt-mcmanus
    tom.hewitt-mcmanus
  • Preparing a CRICOS renewal application (Stage 1)

    Stage 1: the provider prepares a CRICOS renewal application

    Legislative requirements

    Your application should demonstrate that your governing body is assured of your institution’s current, and continuing, compliance with the requirements of the:

    Evidence requirements

    TEQSA has revised its approach to the evidence required for applications to renew CRICOS registration. We have done this to reduce the volume and scope of evidence required to demonstrate compliance with the National Code.

    Applications to renew CRICOS registration should include the following evidence:

    1. A self-assurance report
    Outlining how the governing body manages key sector risks, how it assures itself of the quality of its higher education operations and that it is compliant with the National Code.
    1. An index of supporting evidence
    Referenced throughout the report.
    1. An independent external audit report or additional supporting evidence

    The report of a recently conducted independent external audit of the effectiveness of the provider’s internal mechanisms for self-assurance and compliance with the National Code (including planned and completed actions arising from these reviews).
     

    Or, if the provider does not have self-accrediting authority, and chooses not to provide a recently commissioned independent external audit, additional supporting evidence.

    1. For providers with a Foundation Program – an additional self-assurance report
    Focused on the requirements for renewing a Foundation Program.
    1. For providers with an ELICOS course – an additional self-assurance report
    Focused on the requirements for renewing an ELICOS course.
    1. For providers with an under 17 exemption – an additional self-assurance report
    Satisfying the requirements to renew exemptions to enrol students under the age of 17 in Foundation Programs.

    CRICOS registration renewal: Self-assurance report

    A self-assurance report provides an opportunity to demonstrate the effectiveness of your self-assurance mechanisms.

    The self-assurance report for applying to renew CRICOS registration should be a maximum of 10 pages. It should outline how your governing body assures itself of the quality of your education operations, and your current and continued compliance with the requirements of the ESOS Act, the National Code 2018, and where relevant, the ELICOS Standards, and the Foundation Program Standards.

    When applying to renew CRICOS registration, your self-assurance report should include:

    1. Evidence of how risks have been identified, managed and mitigated, and how your institution will manage these risks going forward (including areas for continuous improvement and any associated actions and measures which are in place to monitor success).
    2. Demonstration of how you manage key sector risks in the following areas:
    Student recruitment and admission

    TEQSA recommends considering our:

    Student participation, support and experience

    TEQSA recommends considering:

    Student attainment

    TEQSA recommends considering:

    1. Where applicable, the findings, actions (planned and completed) and outcomes of at least one external audit. This audit should have been undertaken, by a suitably qualified discipline expert, no more than 18 months before applying to renew CRICOS registration. A copy of the audit should be included, as an attachment, to the self-assurance report.
    2. The findings, actions and outcomes of the most recent review report on recruitment performance, including the performance of agents (e.g. student numbers enrolled and succeeded, meetings with agents and terminations of agents). The following attachments should be included with the self-assurance report:
      • policies and procedures regarding recruitment and management of agents
      • an example of a written agreement between your institution and an education agent.
    3. A copy of an example agreement used where third-party providers are engaged to provide welfare and/or accommodation arrangements to students under the age of 18.
    4. Evidence of a culturally and age-appropriate orientation program, including the presentation used for overseas students.
    5. Details of any third-party arrangements for the delivery of a course or courses to overseas students.

    Note: All claims made in the self-assurance report must be substantiated by evidence, with reference to specific supporting documents in-text. 
     

    Where possible, supporting evidence should be directly accessible via in-text hyperlinks, included as attachments to the report, or listed in the index and available for later submission on request.

    Index of supporting evidence

    Your application should include an index of all supporting evidence referenced in the self-assurance report. At a minimum, the index should include:

    Items to be listed with hyperlinks to their location on your website
    • Policies and procedures regarding:
      • marketing and recruitment
      • credit and recognition of prior learning (RPL)
      • admission
      • assessment of English language proficiency
      • fee refunds
      • students under the age of 18
      • critical incidents
      • student support
      • orientation
      • staff development
      • health and safety
      • overseas student transfers
      • monitoring, recording and assessing course progress, including intervention strategies for students at risk
      • monitoring and recording attendance (where applicable)
      • assessing, approving and recording deferment, suspension and cancellation
      • complaints and appeals.
    • Current marketing and promotional material for current and prospective students, including sample course brochures and promotional material published on social media
    • Overseas student handbooks
    • A current list of education agents engaged to formally represent the provider
    • Samples of information given to students under the age of 18 outlining emergency contacts and how to seek assistance and report on incidents of actual or alleged sexual, physical or other abuse.
    Items may be listed without hyperlinks and TEQSA may request copies of these items at any time
    • Details of marketing materials provided to agents
    • A register of students granted credit within the last 24 months
    • An example of a Letter of Offer and a written agreement between your institution and a student for a course of study
    • Details of any training and development programs provided to agents
    • Evidence demonstrating that the suitability of accommodation for students under the age of 18 has been verified, prior to the accommodation being approved and at least every 6 months thereafter
    • Policies and procedures for selecting, screening and monitoring any third parties your institution has engaged to organise and assess welfare and accommodation arrangements (where applicable)
    • Evidence of compliance with Commonwealth, state and territory legislation, or other regulations regarding child welfare and protection requirements
    • A copy of the Working with Children Check register
    • A copy of the critical incident register, or other written record, for at least the last 2 years
    • Details of ESOS training and ongoing professional development undertaken by staff
    • A description of student services for overseas students, including:
      • legal services
      • emergency and health services
      • academic and English language student support
      • welfare support services
      • other student support services.
    • Examples of correspondence sent by your institution to overseas students when you:
      • intend to refuse a transfer request
      • intend to report the student for unsatisfactory course progress or attendance
      • are notifying the intention to suspend or cancel the student’s enrolment
      • are notifying that a deferral, suspension or cancellation has taken place
      • are notifying the outcome of an internal appeal process for both favourable and adverse decisions.
    • A report of all decisions to defer, suspend or cancel the enrolment of overseas students in the preceding 12 months, with a description of reasons and outcomes
    • A report of all student complaints and appeals received in the preceding 12 months, with evidence of processes implemented and a description of outcomes and actions taken
    • Evidence of quality assurance and monitoring arrangements between your institution and any third party engaged for the delivery of a course
    • An outline of changes to current third-party arrangements for course delivery and a copy of the amended contract if, since being approved by TEQSA, any of the following areas have been impacted:
      • roles and responsibilities of each party
      • delivery site location
      • duration of contract length.
    • A report of all refund requests and outcomes from the previous 12 months, with evidence that refunds provided were reported in PRISMS within the required timeframe (where applicable)
    • Where relevant, evidence your institution is meeting its obligation to maintain the ‘Protected Amount’ (all pre-paid tuition fees must be held in a designated bank account which is separate to day-to-day operating expense accounts)
    • A copy of relevant policies and procedural documents that ensure your institution has robust mechanisms for maintaining the Protected Amount.

    Independent external audit

    Standard 11.4 of the National Code requires providers who are self-accrediting to undertake an independent external audit within 18 months of their registration’s expiry.

    TEQSA strongly encourages all providers (including those who do not have self-accrediting authority) to undertake an independent external audit of their compliance with the ESOS Framework in the second half of their registration period.

    An independent audit is an opportunity for your institution to have a person, or persons, with significant expertise evaluate the effectiveness of your internal mechanisms for self-assurance, to ensure they align with contemporary practice and support continuous improvement.  TEQSA’s ability to efficiently assess your application to renew your CRICOS registration is greatly assisted by a high-quality independent audit report.

    If your institution does not have self-accrediting authority, and you do not submit a recently conducted independent external audit report with your application, you will need to provide additional supporting evidence (see the guidance on preparing additional supporting evidence below).

    A guide for providers undertaking an independent external audit is available. The audit report should be accompanied by your institution’s response, including any completed or in-progress actions which look to address issues the report identified and when they have been, or will be, undertaken.

    Additional supporting evidence

    If your institution does not have self-accrediting authority, and you do not submit a recently conducted independent external audit report, you are required to submit the following items with your application:

    • examples of credit and recognition of prior learning (RPL) decisions, with copies of relevant records and correspondence
    • examples of admissions with copies of relevant records and correspondence, capturing a variety of student cohorts, for example:
      • recruited onshore
      • recruited offshore
      • recruited via a pathway
      • recruited via an agent
      • recruited without an agent
      • admitted with academic qualifications
      • admitted with professional qualifications
      • admitted with prior study at an Australian provider
      • admitted with English language proficiency
      • admitted with an English language waiver.
    • examples of assessment of English language proficiency, with copies of relevant records and correspondence
    • examples of care arrangements for students under the age of 18 and their monitoring, with copies of relevant records and correspondence
    • examples of intervention strategies for managing students at risk and the outcomes of these, with copies of relevant records and correspondence
    • examples of deferments, suspensions and cancellations, with copies of relevant records and correspondence
    • examples of complaints and appeals by students and the outcomes of these, with copies of relevant records and correspondence
    • evidence demonstrating that the suitability of accommodation for students under the age of 18 has been verified before the accommodation was approved and at least every 6 months after its approval
    • policies and procedures for selecting, screening and monitoring any third-parties engaged by the provider to organise and assess welfare and accommodation arrangements (if applicable)
    • a copy of the Working with Children Check register
    • a copy of the critical incident register, or other written record, for at least the last 2 years
    • a description of student services for overseas students, including:
      • legal services
      • emergency and health services
      • academic and English language student support
      • welfare support services
      • other student support services.
    • evidence of quality assurance and monitoring arrangements between the provider and any third-party engaged for the delivery of a course
    • an outline of changes to current third-party arrangements for course delivery and a copy of the amended contract if, since being approved by TEQSA, any of the following areas have been impacted:
      • roles and responsibilities of each party
      • delivery site location
      • duration of contract length.
    • a report of all refund requests and outcomes from the previous 12 months, with evidence that refunds provided were reported in PRISMS within the required timeframe (where applicable)
    • where relevant, evidence that the provider is meeting its obligation to maintain the ‘Protected Amount’ (all pre-paid tuition fees must be held in a designated bank account which is separate to day-to-day operating expense accounts)
    • a copy of relevant policies and procedural documents that ensure that the provider has robust mechanisms for maintaining the Protected Amount.

    Foundation Program renewal

    TEQSA requires CRICOS-registered providers who deliver Foundation Programs to apply for re-accreditation of their Foundation Program(s) at the same time they apply to renew their CRICOS registration. For these providers, the application to renew Foundation Program(s) is integrated into the application to renew CRICOS registration.

    These providers will submit an additional self-assurance report as part of their CRICOS renewal focused on the Foundation Program requirements.

    In instances where a Foundation Program has been added within 2 years of applying to renew CRICOS registration, the provider may limit their Foundation Program renewal application to: a self-assurance report; and, an index of supporting evidence (focused on the Foundation Program requirements), omitting any other attachments.

    ELICOS renewal

    TEQSA requires CRICOS-registered providers who deliver ELICOS courses to apply for re-accreditation of their ELICOS course(s) at the same time they apply to renew their CRICOS registration. For these providers, the application to renew ELICOS course(s) is integrated into the application to renew CRICOS registration.

    These providers will submit an additional self-assurance report as part of their CRICOS renewal, focused on the ELICOS course requirements.

    In instances where an ELICOS course has been added within 2 years of applying to renew CRICOS registration, the provider may limit their ELICOS renewal application to: a self-assurance report; and, an index of supporting evidence (focused on the ELICOS requirements), omitting any other attachments.

    Under 17 exemption renewal

    TEQSA requires providers who have existing exemptions to enrol students under the age of 17 in Foundation Programs, to apply to renew their exemption when they apply to renew their CRICOS registration.

    To renew exemptions to enrol students under the age of 17 in Foundation Programs, you will need to submit the following evidence as an appendix to your CRICOS renewal application:

    • policies and procedures which are in place to manage the provision of welfare arrangements for students under the age of 17, including critical incident policies and procedures
    • details of appropriate arrangements which are in place for student accommodation and wellbeing, including evidence demonstrating that the suitability of accommodation for students under the age of 17 was verified before the accommodation was approved and at least every 6 months after its approval
    • an example of any agreements with third-party providers who have been engaged to provide welfare and/or accommodation arrangements to students under the age of 17
    • policies and procedures for selecting, screening and monitoring any third party your institution has engaged to organise and assess welfare and accommodation arrangements (if applicable)
    • details of appropriate arrangements which are in place for the orientation of students that are under the age of 17, including samples of information given to them relating to emergency contacts and how to seek assistance and report on incidents of actual or alleged sexual, physical or other abuse
    • evidence of appropriate arrangements which are in place for academic progress review of students that are under the age of 17
    • evidence of compliance with Commonwealth, state and territory legislation, or other regulations, regarding child welfare and protection requirements
    • a copy of the Working with Children Check register
    • evidence staff receive training in child protection principles, as part of the staff induction process.
    Last updated: