• Accreditation 21 December 2017

    Provider: International College of Management, Sydney Pty. Limited

    Course: Bachelor of Business Management (Fashion and Global Brand Management)

    Course accreditation

    Report on accreditation of two higher education courses of study offered by International College of Management, Sydney

    A delegate of TEQSA has accredited, under section 49 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act), the following higher education courses of study offered by International College of Management, Sydney (ICMS) for a period of seven years until 20 December 2024.

    • Diploma of Business Management (Fashion Management)
    • Bachelor of Business Management (Fashion and Global Brand Management)

    Main reasons for decision

    TEQSA has determined that the two higher education courses of study submitted by ICMS for accreditation comply with the Provider Course Accreditation Standards.

    The recommendation to approve ICMS's application for accreditation of two courses of study is consistent with the basic principles for regulation in Part 2 of the TEQSA Act. The broad issues which relate to the Bachelor of Business Management (Fashion and Global Brand Management) and Diploma of Business Management (Fashion Management) include:

    a) Course Documentation

    b) Assessment Tasks

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID1331
  • Accreditation 21 December 2017

    Provider: International College of Management, Sydney Pty. Limited

    Course: Diploma of Business Management (Fashion Management)

    Course accreditation

    Report on accreditation of two higher education courses of study offered by International College of Management, Sydney

    A delegate of TEQSA has accredited, under section 49 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act), the following higher education courses of study offered by International College of Management, Sydney (ICMS) for a period of seven years until 20 December 2024.

    • Diploma of Business Management (Fashion Management)
    • Bachelor of Business Management (Fashion and Global Brand Management)

    Main reasons for decision

    TEQSA has determined that the two higher education courses of study submitted by ICMS for accreditation comply with the Provider Course Accreditation Standards.

    The recommendation to approve ICMS's application for accreditation of two courses of study is consistent with the basic principles for regulation in Part 2 of the TEQSA Act. The broad issues which relate to the Bachelor of Business Management (Fashion and Global Brand Management) and Diploma of Business Management (Fashion Management) include:

    a) Course Documentation

    b) Assessment Tasks

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID1332
  • Registration 30 November 2017

    Provider: Southern Cross Education Institute (Higher Education) Pty Ltd

    Initial registration

    Report on initial registration of Southern Cross Education Institute (Higher Education) Pty Ltd

    TEQSA has agreed to orders made by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal under which Southern Cross Education Institute (Higher Education) Pty Ltd (SCEIHE) is registered pursuant to section 21 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act) for a period of three years until 30 November 2020 in the provider category of Higher Education Provider. The orders also provide for the accreditation of the Bachelor of Health and Community Services to be offered by SCEIHE, pursuant to section 49 of the TEQSA Act, and for five conditions to be imposed on SCEIHE's registration pursuant to section 32 of the TEQSA Act. A copy of the conditions is available at Attachment 1.

    Background

    SCEIHE applied to TEQSA for registration in the category of Higher Education Provider under Part 3 of the TEQSA Act.

    TEQSA considered SCEIHE's application and sent SCEIHE a draft summary of findings with details of the assessment of SCEIHE's application by the responsible case management team. TEQSA's Commission considered SCEIHE's response to the draft summary of findings and made a decision to reject SCEIHE's application for registration on 27 April 2017 on the basis that it was not satisfied that SCEIHE met the Threshold Standards.

    SCEIHE applied for review of TEQSA's decision in the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT). In the course of the proceedings, SCEIHE made submissions and provided further information and evidence about the matters raised in TEQSA's decisions.

    It is well established that absent a specific legislative provision to the contrary, the AAT is generally required to make a decision on review based on the evidence available at the time of the AAT's decision on review, and that the AAT is not confined to the evidence available at the time of the primary decision. Accordingly, TEQSA accepted that the AAT was required to take account of the further material submitted to TEQSA after TEQSA had rejected SCEIHE's application.

    Main reasons for decision

    After reviewing the further material submitted by SCEIHE, TEQSA was satisfied that SCEIHE meets the Threshold Standards. However TEQSA considered that there remained a number of risks related to SCEIHE's capacity to meet the Threshold Standards in the future. On this basis, TEQSA agreed that it was appropriate to substitute TEQSA's initial rejection of the applications with decisions to register SCEIHE for a period until 30 November 2020, to accredit SCEIHE's Bachelor of Health and Community Services course for the same period, and to impose a number of conditions on SCEIHE's registration.

    1. The need for SCEIHE to ensure that its corporate governance arrangements demonstrate a clear distinction between governance and management responsibilities, in accordance with Provider Registration Standard (PRS) 3.3;
    2. The need for SCEI's corporate and academic governance arrangements to demonstrate systematic monitoring, review and improvement, in accordance with PRS 3.8;
    3. The need for SCEIHE to ensure that its higher education course of study is systematically updated, through internal revision and external reviews, and that its coherence is maintained, in accordance with Provider Course Accreditation Standard 6.1; and
    4. The need for SCEIHE to have sufficient appropriately qualified and experienced staff to achieve its higher education objectives, in accordance with PRS 5.2, PCAS 4.1 and PCAS 4.2.

    TEQSA is satisfied that the conditions will provide an appropriate framework for TEQSA to oversee SCEIHE's approach to dealing with these issues.

    In accordance with subsections 32(2) and 32(3) of the TEQSA Act, TEQSA may vary or revoke a condition imposed on the registration of a higher education provider, either on its own initiative, or upon application by the provider for variation or revocation. Accordingly, TEQSA will have the capacity to vary or revoke the conditions as SCEIHE addresses the risks identified above.

    Attachment 1

    Conditions imposed on the registration of Southern Cross Education Institute (Higher Education) Pty Ltd (SCEIHE)

    Condition 1

    1. By 15 January 2018, SCEIHE must:
      1. amend the Terms of Reference of its Corporate Board to require that the performance of the CEO be reviewed by the Board at least annually (in the absence of the CEO);
      2. obtain approval from its Corporate Board (in the absence of the CEO) for a methodology for reviewing the CEO's performance;
      3. provide TEQSA with a copy of the performance review methodology, together with evidence of the Corporate Board's approval and evidence that the CEO has consented to the methodology following the Corporate Board's approval.
    2. By 31 July of each year in which SCEIHE is registered as a higher education provider, SCEIHE must provide TEQSA with a copy of the Corporate Board's review of the CEO's performance which is conducted in accordance with the performance review methodology in Condition 1A.

    Condition 2

    SCEI must:

    1. Implement its Reporting Plan for Academic Governance dated October 2017, with respect to the content, timing and distribution of reports.
    2. Within two months after the end of each quarter, provide TEQSA with copies of the reports prepared for the previous quarter, accompanied by minutes of any meetings of its Corporate Board or Academic Board at which the reports were considered. The minutes must:
      1. demonstrate a process consistent with the TEQSA Guidance Notes for the relevant bodies on the matters the subject of discussion; and
      2. specify the extent to which the discussion took account of external advice or input.

    Condition 3

    No later than 4 weeks prior to commencing delivery of the Bachelor of Health and Community Services, SCEIHE must provide TEQSA with its response to the matters raised in the report by Dr Maire, including copies of any new or revised documents prepared as part of the response. The response must be accompanied by evidence that the response has been discussed and approved by SCEIHE's Academic Board which includes a copy of the minutes of the meeting(s) at which the discussion and approval occurred.

    Condition 4

    By 30 March 2018, SCEIHE must prepare, and provide to TEQSA, a revised Risk Register which specifies the risks to SCEIHE's higher education operations, the strategies in place to mitigate those risks and the position(s) responsible for the actions involved in the strategies.

    Condition 5

    SCEIHE must provide TEQSA with a report, not later than 2 weeks prior to the commencement of each teaching period for its higher education courses, which, in relation to each staff member proposed to teach one or more units in an SCEIHE higher education course, describes:

    1. the highest qualification in the discipline of the course being taught;
    2. the unit(s) proposed to be taught and/or assessed;
    3. the professional experience held; and
    4. to the extent that the staff member does not have a qualification in a relevant discipline at least one Australian Qualifications Framework level above the course in which they are proposed to teach, a summary of the basis on which SCEIHE assessed that individual as having knowledge, skills and the capacity to apply knowledge and skills equivalent to such a qualification.
    Condition
    Decision Type
    Registration
    Decision ID
    ID1333
  • Registration and accreditation 30 November 2017

    Provider: Southern Cross Education Institute (Higher Education) Pty Ltd

    Course: Bachelor of Human and Community Services (formerly Bachelor of Health and Community Services)

    Initial registration

    Report on initial registration of Southern Cross Education Institute (Higher Education) Pty Ltd

    TEQSA has agreed to orders made by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal under which Southern Cross Education Institute (Higher Education) Pty Ltd (SCEIHE) is registered pursuant to section 21 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act) for a period of three years until 30 November 2020 in the provider category of Higher Education Provider. The orders also provide for the accreditation of the Bachelor of Health and Community Services to be offered by SCEIHE, pursuant to section 49 of the TEQSA Act, and for five conditions to be imposed on SCEIHE's registration pursuant to section 32 of the TEQSA Act. A copy of the conditions is available at Attachment 1.

    Background

    SCEIHE applied to TEQSA for registration in the category of Higher Education Provider under Part 3 of the TEQSA Act.

    TEQSA considered SCEIHE's application and sent SCEIHE a draft summary of findings with details of the assessment of SCEIHE's application by the responsible case management team. TEQSA's Commission considered SCEIHE's response to the draft summary of findings and made a decision to reject SCEIHE's application for registration on 27 April 2017 on the basis that it was not satisfied that SCEIHE met the Threshold Standards.

    SCEIHE applied for review of TEQSA's decision in the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT). In the course of the proceedings, SCEIHE made submissions and provided further information and evidence about the matters raised in TEQSA's decisions.

    It is well established that absent a specific legislative provision to the contrary, the AAT is generally required to make a decision on review based on the evidence available at the time of the AAT's decision on review, and that the AAT is not confined to the evidence available at the time of the primary decision. Accordingly, TEQSA accepted that the AAT was required to take account of the further material submitted to TEQSA after TEQSA had rejected SCEIHE's application.

    Main reasons for decision

    After reviewing the further material submitted by SCEIHE, TEQSA was satisfied that SCEIHE meets the Threshold Standards. However TEQSA considered that there remained a number of risks related to SCEIHE's capacity to meet the Threshold Standards in the future. On this basis, TEQSA agreed that it was appropriate to substitute TEQSA's initial rejection of the applications with decisions to register SCEIHE for a period until 30 November 2020, to accredit SCEIHE's Bachelor of Health and Community Services course for the same period, and to impose a number of conditions on SCEIHE's registration.

    1. The need for SCEIHE to ensure that its corporate governance arrangements demonstrate a clear distinction between governance and management responsibilities, in accordance with Provider Registration Standard (PRS) 3.3;
    2. The need for SCEI's corporate and academic governance arrangements to demonstrate systematic monitoring, review and improvement, in accordance with PRS 3.8;
    3. The need for SCEIHE to ensure that its higher education course of study is systematically updated, through internal revision and external reviews, and that its coherence is maintained, in accordance with Provider Course Accreditation Standard 6.1; and
    4. The need for SCEIHE to have sufficient appropriately qualified and experienced staff to achieve its higher education objectives, in accordance with PRS 5.2, PCAS 4.1 and PCAS 4.2.

    TEQSA is satisfied that the conditions will provide an appropriate framework for TEQSA to oversee SCEIHE's approach to dealing with these issues.

    In accordance with subsections 32(2) and 32(3) of the TEQSA Act, TEQSA may vary or revoke a condition imposed on the registration of a higher education provider, either on its own initiative, or upon application by the provider for variation or revocation. Accordingly, TEQSA will have the capacity to vary or revoke the conditions as SCEIHE addresses the risks identified above.

    Attachment 1

    Conditions imposed on the registration of Southern Cross Education Institute (Higher Education) Pty Ltd (SCEIHE)

    Condition 1

    1. By 15 January 2018, SCEIHE must:
      1. amend the Terms of Reference of its Corporate Board to require that the performance of the CEO be reviewed by the Board at least annually (in the absence of the CEO);
      2. obtain approval from its Corporate Board (in the absence of the CEO) for a methodology for reviewing the CEO's performance;
      3. provide TEQSA with a copy of the performance review methodology, together with evidence of the Corporate Board's approval and evidence that the CEO has consented to the methodology following the Corporate Board's approval.
    2. By 31 July of each year in which SCEIHE is registered as a higher education provider, SCEIHE must provide TEQSA with a copy of the Corporate Board's review of the CEO's performance which is conducted in accordance with the performance review methodology in Condition 1A.

    Condition 2

    SCEI must:

    1. Implement its Reporting Plan for Academic Governance dated October 2017, with respect to the content, timing and distribution of reports.
    2. Within two months after the end of each quarter, provide TEQSA with copies of the reports prepared for the previous quarter, accompanied by minutes of any meetings of its Corporate Board or Academic Board at which the reports were considered. The minutes must:
      1. demonstrate a process consistent with the TEQSA Guidance Notes for the relevant bodies on the matters the subject of discussion; and
      2. specify the extent to which the discussion took account of external advice or input.

    Condition 3

    No later than 4 weeks prior to commencing delivery of the Bachelor of Health and Community Services, SCEIHE must provide TEQSA with its response to the matters raised in the report by Dr Maire, including copies of any new or revised documents prepared as part of the response. The response must be accompanied by evidence that the response has been discussed and approved by SCEIHE's Academic Board which includes a copy of the minutes of the meeting(s) at which the discussion and approval occurred.

    Condition 4

    By 30 March 2018, SCEIHE must prepare, and provide to TEQSA, a revised Risk Register which specifies the risks to SCEIHE's higher education operations, the strategies in place to mitigate those risks and the position(s) responsible for the actions involved in the strategies.

    Condition 5

    SCEIHE must provide TEQSA with a report, not later than 2 weeks prior to the commencement of each teaching period for its higher education courses, which, in relation to each staff member proposed to teach one or more units in an SCEIHE higher education course, describes:

    1. the highest qualification in the discipline of the course being taught;
    2. the unit(s) proposed to be taught and/or assessed;
    3. the professional experience held; and
    4. to the extent that the staff member does not have a qualification in a relevant discipline at least one Australian Qualifications Framework level above the course in which they are proposed to teach, a summary of the basis on which SCEIHE assessed that individual as having knowledge, skills and the capacity to apply knowledge and skills equivalent to such a qualification.
    Decision
    Decision Type
    Accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID1334
  • Revoke-Vary Conditions 21 December 2017

    Provider: Photography Holdings Pty Ltd

    Course: Master of Arts Photography

    Course accreditation

    Report on revocation of condition of accreditation of one higher education course of study offered by Photography Holdings Pty Ltd

    On 21 December 2017 a delegate of TEQSA revoked, under subsections 53(2) and 53(3) of the TEQSA Act, the condition imposed on the accreditation of the following course offered by Photography Holdings Pty Ltd (refer public report of 23 June 2017):

    • Master of Arts (Photography)

    The decision to revoke the condition was made on the basis that the delegate was satisfied that the conditions had been met.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Vary/Revoke Conditions
    Decision ID
    ID1335
  • Registration 23 November 2017

    Provider: Higher Education Leadership Institute Pty Ltd

    Initial registration

    Report on initial registration of Higher Education Leadership Institute Pty Ltd

    TEQSA has registered, under section 21 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act), Higher Education Leadership Institute Pty Ltd for a period of four years until 23 November 2021 in the provider category of 'Higher Education Provider'.

    TEQSA has imposed, under section 32 of the TEQSA Act, two conditions on the registration of Higher Education Leadership Institute Pty Ltd (HELI).

    Condition 1:

    HELI must not enrol students in, or commence delivery of, the Graduate Certificate in Higher Education Academic Practice until TEQSA notifies HELI that it is satisfied with evidence provided by HELI that:

    1. the Course Coordinator, Learning Designer and Student Support Officer engaged by HELI are appropriately qualified and experienced to achieve its higher education objectives, which include the achievement of expected student learning outcomes. The evidence must include their position descriptions and detailed resumes.
    2. the 'Letter of Offer and Participant Agreement' includes any contractual arrangements with the student, HELI's obligations and the rights and obligations of the student.
    3. HELI has an orientation course and transition support for commencing students.
    4. HELI has a library plan that sets out the electronic library databases and resources that students will be able to access.
    5. HELI has a website with phone numbers for students to contact.

    Condition 2:

    On 1 July of each year for the period of registration, HELI must provide to TEQSA agenda papers and minutes of meetings of the Board of Directors and Academic Board which demonstrate consideration of and any actions taken for:

    1. performance against the strategic plan;
    2. benchmarking activities;
    3. risk management, incorporating a review of the risk ratings;
    4. workforce planning and management; and
    5. monitoring and analysis of student performance.

    TEQSA has accredited, under section 49 of the TEQSA Act, the following higher education course of study offered by Higher Education Leadership Institute Pty Ltd for a period of four years until 23 November 2021:

    • Graduate Certificate in Higher Education Academic Practice

    Main reasons for the decision

    The issues which led TEQSA to shorten the period of registration and course accreditation and to impose conditions on the registration are:

    a) risks that HELI will not have sufficient appropriately qualified personnel

    b) risks that HELI's students will not be adequately informed about their contractual relationship with HELI

    c) risks that HELI's orientation and transition support arrangements will not meet the varying learning needs of HELI's students

    d) risks that HELI will not have sufficient learning resources

    e) risks that HELI will not adequately maintain contact with online students or ensure that students will have access to contact people in a timely way

    f) HELI has no history in the delivery of higher education and, therefore, has limited capacity at this stage to demonstrate its internal governance and quality assurance mechanisms in higher education delivery.

    TEQSA's assessment considered HELI's arrangements for online delivery.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Registration
    Decision ID
    ID1336
  • Registration and accreditation 23 November 2017

    Provider: Higher Education Leadership Institute Pty Ltd

    Course: Graduate Certificate in Higher Education Academic Practice

    Initial registration

    Report on initial registration of Higher Education Leadership Institute Pty Ltd

    TEQSA has registered, under section 21 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act), Higher Education Leadership Institute Pty Ltd for a period of four years until 23 November 2021 in the provider category of 'Higher Education Provider'.

    TEQSA has imposed, under section 32 of the TEQSA Act, two conditions on the registration of Higher Education Leadership Institute Pty Ltd (HELI).

    Condition 1:

    HELI must not enrol students in, or commence delivery of, the Graduate Certificate in Higher Education Academic Practice until TEQSA notifies HELI that it is satisfied with evidence provided by HELI that:

    1. the Course Coordinator, Learning Designer and Student Support Officer engaged by HELI are appropriately qualified and experienced to achieve its higher education objectives, which include the achievement of expected student learning outcomes. The evidence must include their position descriptions and detailed resumes.
    2. the 'Letter of Offer and Participant Agreement' includes any contractual arrangements with the student, HELI's obligations and the rights and obligations of the student.
    3. HELI has an orientation course and transition support for commencing students.
    4. HELI has a library plan that sets out the electronic library databases and resources that students will be able to access.
    5. HELI has a website with phone numbers for students to contact.

    Condition 2:

    On 1 July of each year for the period of registration, HELI must provide to TEQSA agenda papers and minutes of meetings of the Board of Directors and Academic Board which demonstrate consideration of and any actions taken for:

    1. performance against the strategic plan;
    2. benchmarking activities;
    3. risk management, incorporating a review of the risk ratings;
    4. workforce planning and management; and
    5. monitoring and analysis of student performance.

    TEQSA has accredited, under section 49 of the TEQSA Act, the following higher education course of study offered by Higher Education Leadership Institute Pty Ltd for a period of four years until 23 November 2021:

    • Graduate Certificate in Higher Education Academic Practice

    Main reasons for the decision

    The issues which led TEQSA to shorten the period of registration and course accreditation and to impose conditions on the registration are:

    a) risks that HELI will not have sufficient appropriately qualified personnel

    b) risks that HELI's students will not be adequately informed about their contractual relationship with HELI

    c) risks that HELI's orientation and transition support arrangements will not meet the varying learning needs of HELI's students

    d) risks that HELI will not have sufficient learning resources

    e) risks that HELI will not adequately maintain contact with online students or ensure that students will have access to contact people in a timely way

    f) HELI has no history in the delivery of higher education and, therefore, has limited capacity at this stage to demonstrate its internal governance and quality assurance mechanisms in higher education delivery.

    TEQSA's assessment considered HELI's arrangements for online delivery.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID1337
  • Re-accreditation 12 December 2017

    Provider: Melbourne Polytechnic (formerly Northern Melbourne Institute of TAFE)

    Course: Associate Degree of Hospitality Management

    Renewal of course accreditation

    Report on renewal of accreditation of two higher education courses of study offered by Melbourne Polytechnic

    A delegate of TEQSA has renewed, under section 56 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act), the accreditation of the following higher education courses of study offered by Melbourne Polytechnic for a period of four years until 12 December 2021:

    • Associate Degree of Hospitality Management
    • Bachelor of Hospitality Management

    TEQSA has imposed, under section 53 of the TEQSA Act, one condition on the accreditation of both courses:

    Condition 1:

    By 30 November 2018, Melbourne Polytechnic must provide to TEQSA, evidence that demonstrates it benchmarks the academic standards intended to be achieved by students and the standards actually achieved by students in the course(s) of study against similar accredited courses of study offered by other higher education providers.

    This evidence is to include details of the courses and institutions selected for comparison and examples of action taken as a result of analysis of the data. The decision covers course delivery at all Australian sites.

    Main reasons for the decision

    • The recommendation to impose a condition complies with the risk of proportionate regulation, and took account of the decision to cease delivery of both courses in Hong Kong. While there is ongoing concern about Melbourne Polytechnic's ability to demonstrate quality governance arrangements through its course development and review processes, the condition is focussed on the identified area at risk of non-compliance. The condition will give Melbourne Polytechnic an opportunity to provide evidence to demonstrate that it has satisfactorily addressed the risks discussed above. Accordingly, consideration was given that the condition is proportionate to the risks of failing to comply with the Threshold Standards.
    • Similarly, the decision to accredit the courses for a period of four years is a response to the provider's history of risk associated with course development and review and a failure to adequately demonstrate implementation benchmarking arrangements. In particular, the four year accreditation period is intended to provide an opportunity for it to address the risks of non-compliance. On this basis, a four year accreditation period is both necessary and proportionate to the risks of non-compliance with the Threshold Standards.
    Decision
    Decision Type
    Re-accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID1338
  • Re-accreditation 12 December 2017

    Provider: Melbourne Polytechnic (formerly Northern Melbourne Institute of TAFE)

    Course: Bachelor of Hospitality Management

    Renewal of course accreditation

    Report on renewal of accreditation of two higher education courses of study offered by Melbourne Polytechnic

    A delegate of TEQSA has renewed, under section 56 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act), the accreditation of the following higher education courses of study offered by Melbourne Polytechnic for a period of four years until 12 December 2021:

    • Associate Degree of Hospitality Management
    • Bachelor of Hospitality Management

    TEQSA has imposed, under section 53 of the TEQSA Act, one condition on the accreditation of both courses:

    Condition 1:

    By 30 November 2018, Melbourne Polytechnic must provide to TEQSA, evidence that demonstrates it benchmarks the academic standards intended to be achieved by students and the standards actually achieved by students in the course(s) of study against similar accredited courses of study offered by other higher education providers.

    This evidence is to include details of the courses and institutions selected for comparison and examples of action taken as a result of analysis of the data. The decision covers course delivery at all Australian sites.

    Main reasons for the decision

    • The recommendation to impose a condition complies with the risk of proportionate regulation, and took account of the decision to cease delivery of both courses in Hong Kong. While there is ongoing concern about Melbourne Polytechnic's ability to demonstrate quality governance arrangements through its course development and review processes, the condition is focussed on the identified area at risk of non-compliance. The condition will give Melbourne Polytechnic an opportunity to provide evidence to demonstrate that it has satisfactorily addressed the risks discussed above. Accordingly, consideration was given that the condition is proportionate to the risks of failing to comply with the Threshold Standards.
    • Similarly, the decision to accredit the courses for a period of four years is a response to the provider's history of risk associated with course development and review and a failure to adequately demonstrate implementation benchmarking arrangements. In particular, the four year accreditation period is intended to provide an opportunity for it to address the risks of non-compliance. On this basis, a four year accreditation period is both necessary and proportionate to the risks of non-compliance with the Threshold Standards.
    Decision
    Decision Type
    Re-accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID1339