• How to withdraw a course/apply to renew a course in teach out

    What are teach out arrangements?

    Teach out occurs where a decision is taken to phase out a course of study that still has students enrolled. The course continues to be accredited but no new students can be enrolled, and arrangements are in place to ensure that all existing students can either complete the course of study, or transition to a mutually agreed course at no disadvantage.

    The Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2021 (HES Framework) requires providers to have effective teach out or course transition plans in place as teach out can be initiated by either TEQSA or the provider. Providers cannot offer an unaccredited course of study.

    TEQSA initiated teach out

    A course may enter teach out when TEQSA decides:

    • not to renew accreditation of a course while students are currently enrolled
    • not to accredit a course that is intended to replace an existing accredited course that a provider has not sought to reaccredit
    • to cancel the accreditation of a course while students are currently enrolled.

    In these scenarios, TEQSA will follow a risk-based approach and consider the interests of the enrolled students in determining the date on which the course accreditation will end.

    Provider initiated teach out

    Providers may initiate teach out when:

    • they do not intend to continue delivering a course of study, however, there will be students enrolled past the current accreditation expiry date that will either complete or transition out during a teach out period. In this scenario, the provider must apply to TEQSA to renew the course of study, noting that it is being taught out.
    • they do not intend to renew the accreditation of a course of study, and there will be no students enrolled at the current accreditation expiry date as they will have completed or transitioned out. In this scenario, the provider must submit a material change notification to advise of the decision to let the course expire.

    Planned teach out arrangements may include transitioning students into a new course that is intended to replace the existing accredited course (subject to a decision by TEQSA to accredit the new course).

    Accreditation for courses in teach out mode

    A course that is due to expire, but is still in teach out mode, is required to be accredited until all students have either completed or transitioned out.

    Registered higher education providers without self-accrediting authority must apply to TEQSA to seek renewal of accreditation for the course being taught out.

    Because of the special circumstances that apply to courses in teach out, we have introduced a separate accreditation renewal process and a reduced fee. Providers may apply using this process where the period of accreditation to facilitate course teach out does not exceed two years.

    Where a longer period of accreditation is required, providers may apply to renew accreditation of the course using the standard renewal of accreditation process.

    Applications must be submitted at least 180 days before accreditation is due to expire, unless TEQSA has agreed to a shorter time frame. Providers hoping for a shorter time frame must contact us as soon as possible.

    Application guide for renewal of accreditation in teach out

    It is essential that providers read the application guide for renewal of accreditation in teach out before submitting an application. The application guide explains the application process, sets out the required evidence that will need to be submitted with each application, and provides guidance in preparing the application.

    Key considerations for providers in preparing a self-assurance report (renewal of accreditation in teach out)

    All providers are required to prepare and submit a self-assurance report as part of a renewal of accreditation in teach out application. This report should demonstrate the effectiveness of a provider’s self-assurance processes in monitoring, managing and mitigating risks to the course during teach out.

    Guidance on what TEQSA recommends providers consider in preparing the report is available on our website.

    Maintenance of standards

    Courses delivered in teach out mode are still required to meet the requirements of the HES Framework. The teach out re-accreditation process requires providers to demonstrate how they have assured themselves that course resourcing, course outcomes and overall service and support to students will not be adversely impacted by the decision to teach out the course.

    Expiring a course

    If a course is in teach out, but no students will be enrolled beyond the current accreditation expiry date, an application will not be required to renew the course in teach out and the accreditation of the course will expire at that time.

    In this case, providers will be required to submit a material change notification to materialchanges@teqsa.gov.au to advise TEQSA of the decision to let the course expire. Material change notifications should be accompanied by the following:

    • a teach out plan
    • evidence that enrolments have ceased for the course and the course listing on the provider’s website has been updated or removed to reflect this
    • evidence that students enrolled in the course were notified of the decision to cease offering the course and there was no adverse impact to those students
    • confirmed meeting minutes of the academic governing body demonstrating approval to discontinue the course after due consideration of all matters, including the rationale and impact and risks to students
    • confirmation that the course can be expired from the National Register.

    Further information about material change notifications can be found on the TEQSA website.

    Notification requirements

    Providers should also submit a notification to TEQSA via materialchanges@teqsa.gov.au:

    • if the teach out process has not proceeded as planned and there is an adverse impact on students. In this scenario TEQSA will expect to see evidence of the actions being taken by the provider to mitigate any risks to students
    • to confirm that all students have either successfully graduated from the course or transitioned to a comparable course, and that the course can be expired from the National Register.

    National Register

    Where a provider has advised TEQSA that they do not intend to renew the accreditation of a course of study, or the renewal of accreditation has been approved in teach out mode, the National Register entry for the course will include a comment stating ‘Course accredited to [Effective To Date] to facilitate teach out. No further enrolment of students will be permitted.’

    Any accreditation of a course in teach out mode may be subject to a condition regarding the enrolment of new students.

    Further information

    For more information or assistance with preparing an application to renew course accreditation in teach out, please contact the Courses team at assessments@teqsa.gov.au.
     

    Last updated:
  • Gen AI – academic integrity and assessment reform

    This page contains resources to support institutions, staff and students in considering the potential impacts and benefits generative artificial intelligence (gen AI) tools pose for teaching, learning and assessment.

    TEQSA resources
    From the sector
    International
    Last updated:
  • Veda Education Pty Ltd

    Application for registration and course accreditation

     

    Decision: Rejected
    Date of decision: 25 June 2025
    Main reasons for decision:

    The decisions were made on the basis that TEQSA was not satisfied that Veda Education Pty Ltd meets the following provisions of the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2021:

    • Standard 1.1.2 in relation to student participation and attainment
    • Standards 2.1.1 and 2.1.3 in relation to learning environment
    • Standards 3.1.1(c), 3.2.3 in relation to teaching
    • Standards 5.1.3(a),(c), 5.2.1, 5.2.4 in relation to institutional quality assurance
    • Standards in relation to governance and accountability Standards 6.2.1(c),(e),(i) and 6.3.1(d)
    • Standard 7.3.1(a),(b),(c),(d),(e),(f),(i),(j),(k),(l) in relation to representation, information and information management.
    Review stage:  

     

    Last updated:
  • Virtu Design Institute Pty Ltd

    Application for registration and course accreditation

     

    Decision: Rejected
    Date of decision: 11 June 2025
    Main reasons for decision:

    The decisions were made on the basis that TEQSA was not satisfied that Virtu Design Institute Pty Ltd meets the following provisions of the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2021:

    • Domain 2 Learning Environment: Standard 2.1.1
    • Domain 3 Teaching: Standards 3.2.2 and 3.2.3
    • Domain 5 Institutional Quality Assurance: Standards 5.1.1, 5.1.2 and 5.1.3 paragraph (b)
    • Domain 6 Governance and Accountability: Standards 6.1.1; 6.1.3 paragraphs (a), (b), (d), (e); 6.2.1 paragraphs (b), (c), (d), (e), (f); and 6.3.1 paragraph (a).
    Review stage:  

     

    Last updated:
  • New Medical Education Australia Pty Ltd

    Application for registration and course accreditation

     

    Decision: Rejected
    Date of decision: 19 June 2025
    Main reasons for decision:

    The decisions were made on the basis that TEQSA was not satisfied that New Medical Education Pty Ltd meets the following criteria for establishing a greenfield ‘University College’ B1.2:

    • NewMed did not satisfy Criterion 13 which requires it to satisfy the criteria for the ‘Institute of Higher Education’ category, including:
      • Standard 6.2.1(b),(c),(e),(i) in relation to governance and accountability
      • Standards 2.1.1 in relation to learning environment
      • Standards 3.1.4 and 3.1.5 in relation to teaching.
    • NewMed did not satisfy Criterion 14 which requires it to provide strong evidence of financial backing necessary to sustain a ‘greenfield’ University College during start-up (at least the first five years).

    The decision to reject the application for accreditation of the course was made as a consequence of the application for registration being rejected.

    Review stage:  

     

    Last updated:
  • Unsuccessful applications

    TEQSA registers all providers of higher education in Australia.

    We consider if applicants meet the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2021.

    If we approve an application, we publish that decision on the National Register.

    If we reject to an application, we share that decision on this page.

     

    Applicant’s name Date of decision Decision type Details
    New Medical Education Australia Pty Ltd 19 June 2025
    1. Application for registration
    2. Application for accreditation of:
      • Doctor of Medicine
    View more information on New Medical Education Australia's application outcome
    Virtu Design Institute Pty Ltd 11 June 2025
    1. Application for registration
    2. Application for accreditation of:
      • Master of Social Entrepreneurship
      • Graduate Diploma of Social Entrepreneurship
    View more information on Virtu Design Institute's application outcome
    Veda Education Pty Ltd 25 June 2025
    1. Application for registration
    2. Application for accreditation of:
      • Bachelor of Information Technology and
      • Diploma of Information Technology
    View more information on Veda Education's application outcome
    Queen Anne School of Management Pty Ltd 5 February 2025
    1. Application for registration
    2. Application for accreditation of:
      • Bachelor of Business
    View more information on Queen Anne School of Management's application outcome
    Armstrong Institute Pty Limited 19 June 2024
    1. Application for registration
    2. Application for accreditation of:
      • Master of Business Administration (IT)
      • Graduate Certificate of Business Administration and Information Technology
      • Graduate Diploma of Business Administration and Information Technology  
    View more information on Armstrong Institute's application outcome
    AIM Insitute of Higher Education Pty Ltd 27 November 2023
    1. Application for registration
    2. Application for accreditation of Diploma in Business Information Systems
    3. Application for Associate Degree in Business Information Systems
    4. Application for Bachelor of Business Information Systems
    View more information on AIM Insitute of Higher Education's application outcome
    NewLaw Academy Pty Ltd 5 June 2023
    1. Application for registration
    2. Application for accreditation of Graduate Certificate of Legal Practice
    View more information on NewLaw Academy's application outcome
    Southeast Education Pty Ltd 10 May 2021
    1. Application for registration
    2. Applications for accreditation of a Bachelor of Accounting and a Bachelor of Information Technology
    View more information on Southeast Education's application outcome
    SSBI International Pty Ltd 6 August 2020
    1. Application for registration
    2. Application for accreditation of a Bachelor of Commerce and an Associate Degree in Commerce
    View more information on SSBI International's application outcome
    Syme Business School Pty Ltd 8 May 2019
    1. Application for registration
    2. Application for accreditation of Graduate Diploma in Management Accounting
    View more information on Syme Business School's application outcome
    National Institute of Integrative Medicine Ltd 9 May 2018
    1. Application for registration
    2. Application for accreditation of Master of Integrative Medicine (Research)
    View more information on National Institute of Integrative Medicine's application outcome
    Rosary Tertiary Institute Australia Pty Ltd 28 March 2018
    1. Application for registration
    2. Application for accreditation of Bachelor of Education (Secondary)
    View more information on Rosary Tertiary Institute's application outcome
    National Business and Technology Institute Pty Ltd 8 February 2018
    1. Application for registration
    2. Application for accreditation of Bachelor of Business (Innovation) and Diploma of Business (Innovation)
    View more information on the National Business and Technology Institute's application outcome
    Last updated:
  • Guidance notes

    The Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2021 (HES Framework) has applied since 1 July 2021.  

    From a regulatory perspective, all applications made: 

    • before 1 July 2021 will be assessed against the HES Framework 2015
    • on or after 1 July 2021 will be assessed against the HES Framework 2021.

    Material Change Notification Policy (HES Framework 2021)

    View the Material Change Notification Policy.

    Please direct any feedback to standards@teqsa.gov.au.

    Guidance notes

    Guidance notes are concise documents designed to provide high-level, principles-based guidance on interpretation and application of specific standards of the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2021. They also draw attention to other interrelated standards and highlight potential risks to compliance.
     

    TEQSA is working to enhance its suite of guidance notes and will keep providers updated on our progress through our monthly e-News (subscribe here) and our social media channels.
     

    We recognise and value the importance of drawing on knowledge of lived experience in the higher education sector.
     

    Please view our Consultation page to learn more about present opportunities to provide feedback.

    The resources published on this page are not instructional or ‘how to’ documents for compliance with the new HES Framework.

    TEQSA publishes guidance notes to provide greater clarity for providers in the interpretation and application of selected standards. Guidance notes draw on our regulatory experience and knowledge of experts in the higher education sector.

    Guidance notes usually focus on a single topic (such as academic leadership, for example). The guidance note typically outlines:

    • the nature of the topic
    • the relevant standards in the Higher Education Standards Framework (HESF) that relate to the topic
    • the underlying intent of those standards
    • the risks to the quality of education if the topic is not addressed sufficiently by a provider
    • the evidence that TEQSA is likely to look for to be satisfied that the requirements of the HESF are being met.   

    Comments and feedback on guidance notes can be emailed to standards@teqsa.gov.au.

    Current guidance notes

    Guidance note Last updated
    Academic Governance 30 November 2023
    Academic and Research Integrity  2 February 2024
    Academic Leadership (beta version) 18 June 2019
    Academic Monitoring, Review and Improvement 19 March 2024
    Academic Quality Assurance 11 October 2017
    Admissions (coursework) 4 May 2022
    Changes in a Course of Study that may lead to Accreditation as a New Course 6 March 2017
    Corporate Governance 26 August 2019
    Course Design (including Learning Outcomes and Assessment) 11 October 2017
    Credit and Recognition of Prior Learning 7 July 2023
    Delivery with Other Parties 7 July 2023
    Determining Professional Equivalence – [full title: Determining Equivalence of Professional Experience and Academic Qualifications] 11 October 2017
    Diversity and Equity 11 October 2017
    Facilities and infrastructure 30 November 2023
    Financial Assessment 11 April 2019
    Financial Standing  11 April 2019
    Grievance and Complaint Handling 22 February 2019
    Joint and Dual Awards 11 October 2017
    Learning resources and educational support 11 June 2025
    Monitoring and Analysis of Student Performance (beta version) 6 January 2020
    Nested Courses  13 August 2019
    Research and Research Training 11 December 2024
    Research Requirements for Australian Universities 30 April 2024
    Scholarship 4 May 2022
    Staffing 11 June 2025
    Technology-Enhanced Learning  11 April 2019
    TEQSA and the Australian Qualifications Framework 27 August 2019
    Transnational Higher Education - Inbound [full title: Transnational Higher Education into Australia (including international providers seeking to offer higher education in Australia)] 11 October 2017
    Varying a Period of Registration or Accreditation 26 August 2019
    Wellbeing and Safety 8 January 2018
    Work-Integrated Learning 4 May 2022

    Statements of Regulatory Expectations

    A Statement of Regulatory Expectations (SRE) is a regulatory tool TEQSA uses to address systemic ongoing or acute emerging risks to compliance with the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2021.

    Good practice notes

    Guide to determining the fitness and propriety of a person

    This guidance sets out the principles and considerations that TEQSA will have regard to when assessing fitness and propriety for the purposes of the TEQSA Act. 

    Independent Experts engaged by providers 

    This document provides guidance to providers on selecting a suitable independent expert to conduct a review or seek expert advice as part of their internal quality assurance processes.

    Glossary of terms

    Last updated:
  • Tuition protection – information for providers

    In an event that a non-exempt registered higher education provider fails to commence or ceases to deliver a unit and/or course to their students (that is, the provider “defaults”), that provider has responsibilities under three different mechanisms depending on whether the student is an overseas student, a domestic student accessing Higher Education Loan Program (HELP) loans, or a domestic up-front fee-paying student. These mechanisms are summarised in the table below.

    Mechanisms covering different types of students

    International student Education Services for Overseas Students Act 2000 (ESOS Act)
    FEE-HELP or HECS-HELP student Higher Education Support Act 2003 (HESA)
    Domestic up-front fee-paying Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (TEQSA Act)

    Providers with overseas and/or HELP students are already part of the tuition protection scheme. Regarding overseas students, providers should refer to Sections 46B and 46D of the ESOS Act for their specific obligations in the event of a default. For FEE HELP and HECS HELP students, providers1 should refer to Part 5-1A of HESA for their obligations in the event of a default.

    As of 1 January 2021, there are new requirements for providers2 regarding domestic students who pay their tuition fees up-front. Providers must pay any tuition protection levies (and any late payment penalty), keep records for tuition protection purposes, and disclose tuition protection information and documents to the Department of Education. Providers must also comply with certain obligations in the case of a default such as to provide a refund or alternate suitable unit and/or course replacement within 14 days to their students affected by the provider default.

    Providers are also required to report certain information in the approved form under Section 12 of the Tuition Protection (Up-front Payments Guidelines) 2020. The approved form is available from the Department of Education (TPS).

    Relevant TEQSA requirements 

    Part 5A of the TEQSA Act sets out tuition protection arrangements for domestic up-front fee-paying students. It is a condition of registration for private higher education providers to meet the tuition protection requirements, including reporting student information and student notification requirements.

    The Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2015 (HES Framework) contains obligations under Standard 6.2.1 for providers to ensure there are credible business continuity plans and adequately resourced financial and tuition safeguards to mitigate disadvantage to students who are unable to progress in a course of study due to unexpected changes to the higher education provider’s operations.

    The TPS alone does not fulfil this obligation and is not a replacement for it. For further advice on financial and tuition safeguards and implications of the new scheme for your context, contact the TEQSA Enquiries Management team at providerenquiries@teqsa.gov.au.

    Table A providers (i.e. public universities), TAFEs and other government owned providers are exempt from the requirements relating to the up-front payments tuition protection arrangements, except for obligations relating to providing information about replacement courses (section 62N of TEQSA Act) and obligations of replacement providers (Section 62P and 62Q of the TEQSA Act). Further, they are still required to have arrangements for financial and tuition safeguards as per Standard 6.2.1 of the HES Framework. 

    Key links

    Notes

    1. 'Table A' Universities, TAFEs and other Government-owned providers are exempt from the tuition protection arrangements for HELP students, except for obligations relating to providing information about replacement courses (section 166-27 of HESA) and obligations of replacement providers (Sections 166-30 and 166-32 of HESA)
    2. 'Table A' Universities, TAFEs and other Government-owned providers are exempt from the tuition protection arrangements for domestic up-front fee-paying students, except for obligations relating to providing information about replacement courses (section 62N of TEQSA Act) and obligations of replacement providers (Section 62P and 62Q of the TEQSA Act).
    Last updated:
  • Material changes

    What is a material change notification?

    A material change notification is how providers ensure timely disclosure of events that happen or are likely to happen that will significantly affect a provider’s ability to comply with the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2021 (HES Framework) or that will require changes to the National Register.

    TEQSA understands that serious incidents and changes will happen. When something serious happens TEQSA has an important role in assuring that providers respond appropriately and that students and quality are not adversely affected.

    Notifications do not constitute an application for approval to implement changes, as approval is not required. However, TEQSA will follow up if it considers there is a risk of non-compliance with Standards in the HES Framework.

    Providers subject to the Education Services for Overseas Students Act 2000 (ESOS Act) and National Code of Practice for Providers of Education and Training to Overseas Students 2018 (National Code) should be mindful of any notification and application requirements arising from changes in circumstances under the ESOS Act. Information about notifications and approvals required under the ESOS Framework can be found on the TEQSA website. Providers should use the relevant CRICOS change form to notify TEQSA of any changes that require notification under the ESOS Act.

    Why material change notifications are important

    Notifying TEQSA of material changes is important for the following reasons:

    • It is an obligation under the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (TEQSA Act)
      • Section 29(1)(a) of the TEQSA Act requires that a registered higher education provider must notify TEQSA if an event happens or is likely to happen that will significantly affect the provider’s ability to meet the HES Framework.
      • Section 29(1)(b) of the TEQSA Act requires that a registered higher education provider must notify TEQSA an event that will require the Register to be updated in respect of the provider.
      • Section 29(2) of the TEQSA Act requires that the notification must be given no later than 14 days after the day the provider would reasonably be expected to have become aware of the event.
    • For CRICOS-registered providers, it is an obligation under the Section 17A of the ESOS Act to notify TEQSA of certain changes. These are listed on the TEQSA website: Notifications and Approvals Required of CRICOS Registered Providers.
    • Reporting gives TEQSA assurance that the provider is identifying and responding to risks
      Information provided as part of a material change notification provides TEQSA with insight about how the provider has identified risks and is responding to and managing these risks. Where TEQSA has confidence that risks are being managed, there may be no need for any further action by TEQSA. A well-documented notification also enables TEQSA to better understand and address any concerns we receive in relation to the changes.
    • TEQSA may need to provide regulatory advice or guidance
      Timely notification allows TEQSA to identify any potential issues or concerns at an early stage and, where appropriate, provide further advice or guidance to providers to ensure continued compliance with the HES Framework. TEQSA is confident that most providers are willing and able to be compliant, or to take actions to achieve compliance, when risks or concerns are identified.

      While TEQSA’s principal objective is to encourage and facilitate voluntary compliance, TEQSA will, where necessary, take enforcement action. In deciding what response is appropriate, TEQSA will take into consideration several factors, including whether the provider has complied with its duty to notify, and any proactive action the provider has taken to address the non-compliance. For more information see TEQSA’s approach to compliance and enforcement.
    • Reporting allows TEQSA to monitor risks across the sector
      The information collected through material change notifications gives TEQSA an insight into risks that may have an impact on multiple providers or the sector as a whole and to provide appropriate advice and guidance to providers on potential and emerging risks.   

    What changes require notification 

    Providers are required to notify TEQSA if an event happens or is likely to happen that will significantly affect the provider’s ability to meet the HES Framework.

    Beyond areas listed in paragraph 8 of TEQSA’s material change notification policy, what constitutes ‘significant’ will depend on the individual circumstances of the provider, taking into account students, operations, finances, and reputation. It is the responsibility of each provider to decide whether an incident poses a significant risk or threat to its ability to comply with the HES Framework.

    When deciding whether or not a change requires reporting to TEQSA, providers should consider:

    • The impact of the change. Who and what has been, or may be in the future, impacted by the change? For example, does the change pose a risk to students or the provider’s financial viability?
    • The risks and potential consequences. Does the change pose a risk to the provider’s ability to meet the HES Framework or continue its current operations?
    • The nature of the change. Is the change a one-off event, or is it a result of, or could lead to, more systemic or ongoing risks? 

    Providers are required to notify TEQSA of a material change even when the risks associated with the change have been mitigated. This gives TEQSA assurance that the provider is identifying and responding to risks and enables TEQSA to address any concerns we receive in relation to the changes.

    The guidance below shows types of events that should and shouldn’t be reported to TEQSA. This is not a definitive list but is indicative only.

    Event or change Notification IS required Notification is NOT required
    Financial standing

    A major shareholder enters into administration.

    Why? There is a risk to continued operation and quality of the student experience (Standards 6.2.1c-d)

    A provider institutes a change to an accounting period for financial reporting.
    Reputation/Good standing

    A provider is advised of an unscheduled compliance audit by another regulator.

    Why? There is a risk that the provider is not complying with all legislative requirements (Standard 6.2.1a) 

    A provider becomes aware that a public interest disclosure has occurred.
    Corporate Governance

    There are changes to the membership of a governing body in a provider not established or recognised by Acts of Parliament.

    Why? There is a risk to a provider’s corporate governance (Domain 6) 

    The terms of reference or delegations for a governing the corporate board are updated and not as a result of a change in ownership. 
    Academic Governance There is a change to the chair of the Academic Board in a provider not established or recognised by Acts of Parliament. A change in membership to the Academic Board.
    Academic Integrity

    A contract cheating incident involving multiple students, that suggests a systemic or widespread issue, is discovered.

    Why? There is a risk to academic integrity (Section 5.2, Standards 6.2.1j, 6.3.2d)

    A single instance of contract cheating is identified.
    Safety and wellbeing

    An investigation into a sexual assault on campus identifies failures in policies and processes designed to protect students.

    Why? There is a risk to wellbeing and safety (Standard 2.3)

    A student is injured on campus. The incident is managed by staff following the provider’s relevant policies and procedures.
    Third party arrangements

    The addition of a new third-party provider or a provider becomes aware of serious mismanagement by a third-party provider.

    Why? There is a risk to the quality of the student experience (Section 5.4, Standards 6.2.1i, 6.2.1k) 

    Delivery arrangements with a third party have been amended and the change will not significantly impact the ability of the higher education provide to meet the HES Framework.
    Courses

    A provider fails to obtain professional accreditation for a course of study.

    Why? There is a risk that students may not complete the course in the expected timeframe or be eligible to practise (Section 3.1, Standards 6.2.1i, 7.2.4)

    Major changes to a course have been made, including changes to the requirements for completing a course.

    Why? This requires a course accreditation application.

    Information security

    A phishing attack disrupts a provider’s IT systems and key services.

    Why? There is a risk to information security which could compromise operations (Standard 7.3.3) 

    Personal information relating to one student is disclosed without authorisation and corrective action is implemented immediately.

    Changes that require an update to the National Register through an MCN 

    Providers must notify TEQSA of any of the following changes that require an update to the National Register:

    • any change to the name of the legal entity
    • any change to the ABN
    • any change to the business or trading name
    • any change to the details of the provider’s head office
    • any change to the provider’s website address
    • any change in the name of a course of study

    How to submit a notification and what to provide

    TEQSA expects providers to submit material change notifications no later than 14 days after the day that the provider would reasonably be expected to have become aware of the event.

    CRICOS registered providers should be aware of different timelines for reporting changes. These are outlined at Notifications and approvals required of CRICOS registered providers.

    • Notifications must be submitted via email to materialchanges@teqsa.gov.au
    • The notification should include information such as:
      • Details of the change, including when the event happened or will happen, and which standards within the HES Framework it relates to
      • Whether the change is temporary or ongoing
      • How the provider is managing the change and mitigating any associated risks to ensure continued compliance with the HES Framework
      • For unanticipated events, details about how and when the event was detected and whether there was a failure of existing controls to detect and mitigate the risk of non-compliance
      • Details of the internal approval process for the change (if applicable)
      • In the case of changes to a course of study, the provider should include the rationale used to assure itself that the changes do not constitute a new course of study requiring an initial accreditation application
      • Evidence that the relevant body (e.g. the governing body, the audit and risk committee or Academic Board) has been advised of the event and consulted on mitigation plans.
    • In the event of multiple changes taking place at the same time, only one consolidated notification is required
    • There is no fee for submitting a material change notification.

    Once notification is received by TEQSA

    Providers will receive email confirmation from TEQSA that the notification has been received. TEQSA will contact the provider if any additional information or clarification is required.

    Dual-sector providers

    TEQSA is aware that dual-sector providers are also required to notify ASQA of material changes and that ASQA has different reporting requirements. TEQSA and ASQA are working together to try to minimise the difference in the reporting requirements between the two regulators.

    More information

    For more information on TEQSA’s approach to Material change notifications, view our Material change notification policy and Notifications and approvals required of CRICOS registered providers.

    Contact

    If you have any questions regarding material change notifications, please email materialchanges@teqsa.gov.au and CC in the TEQSA Enquiries Management team at providerenquiries@teqsa.gov.au.

    Last updated: