• TEQSA releases academic integrity toolkit for international quality assurance agencies

    TEQSA has published a new resource to support higher education quality assurance agencies around the world to promote, develop and sustain cultures of academic integrity.

    TEQSA led the development of the new Toolkit to support quality assurance agencies to address academic integrity and contract cheating, which was funded by a grant from the International Network for Quality Assurance Agencies in Higher Education (INQAAHE).

    TEQSA Chief Commissioner and Acting CEO Professor Nick Saunders said ensuring academic integrity was a shared focus among global higher education quality assurance agencies and TEQSA was proud to have made this contribution.

    “The reputation of higher education globally depends on students, institutions, business and governments having confidence that academic integrity is being upheld,” Professor Saunders said.

    “This new resource, developed by TEQSA with support from the Quality Beyond Boundaries Group of quality assurance agencies, will assist higher education quality assurance agencies around the world in developing and sustaining cultures of academic integrity within their respective jurisdictions and will support them to stamp out contract cheating.”

    “At a time when there has been considerable disruption to higher education worldwide due to the COVID-19 pandemic, it is essential that academic standards continue to be supported and upheld, and I believe this new resource will be a welcome tool for many agencies.”

    The new toolkit includes good practice advice around a range of topics including academic integrity frameworks, contract cheating and supporting and sustaining cultures of academic integrity.

    Media enquiries 

    Bryan Allchin, Assistant Director, Communications: comms@teqsa.gov.au, 0437 143 012

    Date
    Last updated:
  • TEQSA to establish new Higher Education Integrity Unit

    TEQSA has welcomed Australian Government funding to strengthen the agency’s ability to identify and protect against risks to the integrity of the nation’s higher education sector.

    Announced earlier today by the Minister for Education, the Hon Dan Tehan MP, the Australian Government will provide $3.9 million per year to maintain the new Higher Education Integrity Unit within TEQSA to identify and analyse emerging risks and take pre-emptive action to assist the sector to address these threats.

    ‘This welcome investment will enable TEQSA to be more proactive in responding to risks to the integrity of Australia’s higher education sector, supporting the protection of student interests and the reputation of the sector,’ said TEQSA Chief Commissioner and Acting CEO Professor Nick Saunders.

    ‘The Higher Education Integrity Unit will continue TEQSA’s partnership approach, collaborating with higher education providers and other stakeholders to deliver a range of activities including data and intelligence analysis, provision of educational resources and establishing communities of practice.’

    Areas of focus for the Higher Education Integrity Unit will change as circumstances require (following consultation with the sector, government and other stakeholders), but will include admission standards and information, academic and research governance integrity, student safety, foreign interference, cyber security, fraud and corruption. The integrity unit’s activities will not be subject to cost recovery.

    The funding will also support TEQSA’s responsibilities under the Prohibiting Academic Cheating Services Bill which is currently before Parliament.

    Media enquiries 

    Bryan Allchin, Assistant Director, Communications: comms@teqsa.gov.au, 0437 143 012

    Date
    Last updated:
  • Good Practice Note published

    TEQSA has released a new online resource to assist Australian higher education providers in preventing and responding to sexual assault and sexual harassment (SASH).

    The Good Practice Note: Preventing and responding to sexual assault and sexual harassment in the Australian higher education sector features examples and practical advice for providers to support further improvements in policies, procedures and practices.

    “The sector has been working to improve its ability to prevent and respond to sexual assault and sexual harassment for several years. It is essential that this work continue, even during the disruption caused by COVID-19, to ensure student interests are protected,” said TEQSA Chief Commissioner and Acting CEO Professor Nick Saunders.

    “This Good Practice Note aims to further support Australian higher education providers to adopt policies and practices to prevent and respond to sexual assault and sexual harassment, consistent with TEQSA’s fundamental purpose to safeguard student interests and the reputation of Australia’s higher education sector,” he said.

    The Good Practice Note was developed following extensive consultation and input from across the sector.

    TEQSA acknowledges and thanks all students, experts, providers and their staff, as well as other stakeholders who have made a contribution to its development.

    Media enquiries 

    Bryan Allchin, Assistant Director, Communications: comms@teqsa.gov.au, 0437 143 012

    Date
    Last updated:
  • Professor Peter Coaldrake AO appointed as TEQSA Commissioner

    TEQSA has announced the appointment of Emeritus Professor Peter Coaldrake AO as a Commissioner. The appointment, made by the Hon Dan Tehan MP, Minister for Education, is for a period of five years.

    TEQSA Chief Commissioner Professor Nick Saunders, in welcoming Professor Coaldrake’s appointment, said “Professor Coaldrake brings a wealth of experience to TEQSA, drawn from his extensive national and international higher education service and leadership; and his comprehensive understanding of Australia’s higher education sector, quality assurance and regulatory standards. His expertise will support the agency in protecting students and the reputation of the Australian higher education sector as we continue to work through the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.”

    Professor Coaldrake has a distinguished record in higher education, having completed his almost 15-year term as Vice-Chancellor and CEO of Queensland University of Technology (QUT) in December 2017. A dual Fulbright scholar, he is also a former chair of both Universities Australia and the governing board of the OECD’s then higher education group IMHE.  

    In October 2018 Professor Coaldrake was appointed by the Education Minister, the Hon Dan Tehan MP, to conduct a review into the Higher Education Provider Category Standards. In 2018 he also undertook two separate reviews for the Queensland government: one dealing with the present and future Queensland public sector workforce, and the other of the future of vocational education, training and skilling in central-western Queensland.

    Professor Coaldrake is currently the Chair of the Board of the Queensland Performing Arts Trust, and a Board Member of the Queensland Community Foundation. Upon accepting his appointment as a Commissioner of TEQSA, Professor Coaldrake is stepping down from two other roles, as Chair of Jobs Queensland and as an external Council member of the University of Newcastle.  

    Professor Coaldrake will join existing TEQSA Commissioners Professor Nick Saunders AO, Emeritus Professor Joan Cooper and Emeritus Professor Cliff Walsh.

    Along with responsibility for TEQSA’s regulatory decisions, the Commissioners, as TEQSA’s Accountable Authority, are also responsible for setting the strategic directions of the agency, governance, financial management, performance reporting and its regulatory approach.

    Media enquiries 

    Bryan Allchin, Assistant Director, Communications: comms@teqsa.gov.au, 0437 143 012

    Date
    Last updated:
  • COVID-19 response continues with first Undergraduate Certificate courses accredited

    TEQSA has completed the first accreditations of new Undergraduate Certificate courses.

    Professor Nick Saunders, TEQSA Chief Commissioner and Acting CEO, said the agency has implemented a streamlined approach for the assessment of new Graduate and Undergraduate Certificate courses, which form part of the Australian Government’s recently announced Higher Education Support Package.

    “We’re working closely with the sector during the COVID-19 pandemic to ensure Australian higher education courses continue to be world-class,” Professor Saunders said.

    “Through our streamlined approvals process, TEQSA is supporting providers to get these new courses to students as soon as possible.”

    TEQSA’s other work to support the sector through the COVID-19 pandemic includes:

    • Reducing the administrative burden of regulation on higher education providers during the COVID-19 pandemic, including deferring cyclical assessments, waiving fees and refunding fees already paid.
    • Publishing good practice resources to support higher education providers transitioning to online delivery.
    • Updating our webpages for students.
    • Working with RMIT University to develop a series of webinars for higher education professionals to support good online learning practice.

    The Undergraduate Certificate is a formal qualification recognised under the Australian Qualifications Framework. All higher education providers (with the appropriate accreditation), can issue Undergraduate Certificates until at least December 2021.

    Date
    Last updated:
  • National principles for clinical education during the COVID-19 pandemic

    The Department of Health, the Department of Education, Skills and Employment, the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) and the Health Professions Accreditation Collaborative Forum (HPACF) have issued a joint statement setting out national principles to guide the decisions of professions, accreditation authorities, education providers and health services about student clinical education during the COVID-19 pandemic response.

    Date
    Last updated:
  • Overview of changes

    On 27 April 2021, the updated Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2021 was published on the Federal Register of Legislation.

    This is the first update to the Threshold Standards since 2015.

    The Threshold Standards were revised in response to the review of the Provider Category Standards conducted in 2019. The Higher Education Legislation Amendment (Provider Category Standards and Other Measures) Act 2021 gave effect to the Australian Government’s decision to implement all 10 recommendations arising from this review.

    The updated Threshold Standards, which incorporate the revised provider categories came into effect from 1 July 2021.

    Further amendments to Threshold Standards were made on 1 December 2021 to include a definition of Academic Freedom and update three standards.

    What’s new in the 2021 Threshold Standards?

    Part A: Standards for Higher Education

    With the exception of minor amendments to Standards 1.2.1, 1.2.2 and 7.3.2, Part A is unchanged from the 2015 Threshold Standards.

    Updated standard 1.2.1 and 1.2.2

    Amendments to standards 1.2.1 and 1.2.2 clarify that these standards are intended to reflect the credit and recognition of prior learning policy in the Australian Qualifications Framework (AQF).

    Updated standard 6.1.4

    Amendments to standard 6.1.4 require higher education providers’ governing bodies to take steps to develop and maintain an institutional environment in which freedom of speech and academic freedom are upheld and protected.

    Updated standard 7.3.2

    New item (g) in Standard 7.3.2 ensures that information about the provider’s credit and recognition of prior learning policy, and any articulation or credit arrangements applicable to each course of study, is readily and publicly accessible.

    Part B: Criteria for Higher Education Providers

    This part of the Standards has been rewritten to incorporate the recommendations of the 2019 review of the Provider Category Standards. Among the changes are the replacement of the six previous provider categories with four new categories.

    Updates to Part B1: Criteria for Higher Education Provider Categories

    • Part B1 sets out the criteria for each of the four higher education provider categories listed in section 6 of the Threshold Standards.
    • B1 explains that all providers of higher education must meet the requirements of Part A and satisfy the requirements set out under the ‘Institute of Higher Education’ category in order to gain registration by TEQSA. It further explains that higher education providers may seek approval within a particular provider category under subsection 18(1) (applying for registration) or section 38 (change of category) of the TEQSA Act, and states that the provider category of each higher education provider will be included on the National Register of Higher Education Providers (administered by TEQSA).
    • B1 also introduces a new requirement for a higher education provider to feature their TEQSA Provider Identification and provider category on relevant public material.

    Institute of Higher Education

    • B1.1 sets out the requirements that a higher education provider must meet to be registered in the Institute of Higher Education category, including a clearly articulated higher education purpose that includes a commitment to freedom of speech and academic freedom.

    University College

    • B1.2 sets out the requirements that a higher education provider registered in the University College category must meet.
    • A note explains that providers registered in this category do not need to adopt the ‘University College’ branding if the name does not suit their mission or purpose.
    • There are two pathways into the University College category, these being:
      • an existing provider that demonstrates a mature level of development and a track record of compliance against the criteria for this category (criteria B1.2.1-12 apply to this pathway); or
      • a new provider (greenfield) that demonstrates the capacity, resources and credible plans to satisfy the University College category criteria within category criteria within five years of commencing teaching and the Australian University category criteria within five years of commencing teaching (criteria B1.2.13-18 apply to this pathway).
    • A note explains that where a newly established higher education provider can already demonstrate that it meets all of the requirements of the ‘Australian University’ category, including mature development and a track record of compliance, TEQSA may consider approving direct entry of the new entity to the ‘Australian University’ category if it is satisfied that the corporate and academic governance arrangements established for the new entity will ensure continued compliance and performance to the required standard for that category. It is expected this could only occur in very limited circumstances – for example if a large existing university were separated into two smaller entities that could demonstrate appropriate levels of corporate and academic governance and quality assurance.

    Australian University

    • B1.3 sets out the requirements that a higher education provider must meet to be registered in the Australian University category, including the delivery of self-accrediting undergraduate and postgraduate courses of study.
    • B1.3 explains that, where an ‘Australian University’ has self-accrediting authority in only one or two broad (2-digit) fields of education, it is deemed to have a specialised focus. It further explains that, where an ‘Australian University’ with a specialised focus delivers courses of study in new broad (2 digit) field/s of education, the provider must be successful in seeking authorisation to self-accredit courses of study in the new field/s within 10 years from the commencement of those courses of study.
    • A note explains that, upon achieving self-accrediting authority in at least three broad (2-digit) fields of education for which Doctoral Degrees (Research) are also delivered, the ‘Australian University’ is no longer deemed to have a specialised focus.
    • B1.3 also states that undertaking of research that leads to new knowledge and original creative endeavour and research training are fundamental to the status of a higher education provider as an ‘Australian University’.
    • A note explains that when assessing the research requirements in criteria B1.3.16-19, TEQSA may specify the matters to be considered in a legislative instrument. TEQSA will use existing national research benchmarking exercises where they are applicable. Where they are not applicable, TEQSA will benchmark against standard research indicators.
    • B1.3 then sets out the standards for research that an Australian University must satisfy.

    Overseas University

    • B1.4 sets out the requirements that a higher education provider registered in the Overseas University category must meet.

    Updates to Part B2: Criteria for Seeking Self-Accrediting Authority

    Part B2 explains that providers can apply to TEQSA for limited or unlimited self-accrediting authority. It then sets out requirements that a provider must demonstrate it has satisfied for TEQSA to consider granting self-accrediting authority.

    Updates to Part B3: Transitional Standards

    • Part B3 sets out the transition arrangements for providers that were already registered at the time the 2021 Threshold Standard takes effect.
    • Part B3.1 explains that TEQSA will determine the appropriate provider category for each registered provider to transition to on commencement of the 2021 Thresholds Standards.
    • Part B3.2 sets transitional research standards for providers in the Australian University provider category. It explains that a provider that is registered in the ‘Australian University’ category after the 2021 Threshold Standards comes into force, and, immediately before the commencement date was in a provider registration category that permitted use of the word ‘university’, must achieve the benchmarks set out B1.3 within particular time frames.

    More information

    Provider Category Standards reform implementation

    Quality of Research Determination 2021

    This legislative instrument complements new research quality criteria included in the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2021 for the ‘Australian University’ category. It provides clarity around the research quality indicators that TEQSA will have regard to in relation to an entity or provider seeking registration or re-registration as an Australian University.

    Guidelines for the use of the word 'university'

    More information for providers about the use of the word ‘university’ in Australian higher education is available from the Department of Education, Skills and Employment.

    Frequently asked questions

    What is the impact on my in-progress assessment?

    There will be no impact for in-progress assessment that are completed before 1 July 2021.

    There should be minimal impact and in most cases no impact for existing providers applying to renew their registration, and for providers applying to accredit or renew a course, as well as for potential new providers seeking initial registration in the Higher Education Provider category. This is because of the minimal changes to Part A of the HESF. Further, a potential new provider seeking to register in the previous Higher Education Provider category will be registered in the new Institute of Higher Education category should their application be successful. The assessment manager responsible for an existing assessment will contact a provider if there are any further information requirements needed to complete an assessment that is still in progress after 1 July 2021.

    What is the impact on my upcoming renewal or new assessment, for which I have already received my confirmed evidence table?

    There should be minimal impact and in most cases no impact where a provider has received a confirmed evidence table. The assessment manager responsible for an assessment will contact a provider if there are any further information requirements after an application has been received.

    What happens if I had planned to submit for self-accrediting authority or provider category change under the HESF 2015? Can I still submit? What if I have an in progress application I have not yet submitted?

    Applications received after 1 July 2021 for self-accrediting authority (SAA) or provider category change (PCC) will have the evidence requirements based on, and the application assessed against, the HESF 2021. The responsible TEQSA assessment manager will contact a provider if there are any further information requirements after an application has been received.

    Please speak to your TEQSA case manager regarding any SAA or PCC applications in progress or where evidence requirements have been provided for an SAA or PCC application.

    Will the online forms change?

    TEQSA is updating the provider portal to incorporate updated forms from 1 July 2021.

    When can I apply for SAA under HESF 2021?

    Now the 2021 Threshold Standards are in effect, providers can lodge an application for self-accrediting authority. Please speak to your TEQSA case manager if you have additional questions about this process.

    When can I apply for the University College category under HESF 2021?

    Eligible providers that already possessed self-accrediting authority were contacted by TEQSA in March 2021 to outline the process for categorisation under the new University College category. Other providers who wish to be considered for the University College category must first achieve self-accrediting authority. Please speak to your TEQSA case manager to find out more.

    Last updated:
  • Quality of Research Determination 2021

    On 12 July 2021, the Minister for Education and Youth approved the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (Quality of Research) Determination 2021.

    This legislative instrument complements new research quality criteria included in the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2021 for the Australian University category.

    It provides clarity around the research quality indicators that TEQSA will have regard to in relation to an entity or provider that is registered in, or is seeking registration for, the ‘Australian University’ category.

    The determination is not intended to be prescriptive or exhaustive, and TEQSA may consider other relevant evidence of research quality not listed in the determination.

    Consultation

    In April 2021, TEQSA published a consultation paper on the TEQSA website, including a list of matters proposed to be included in the determination, asking for submissions by 28 April 2021. A total of 42 submissions were received and considered when drafting the final determination.

    Frequently asked questions

    Why has TEQSA made this determination?

    This determination provides clarity around the research quality indicators, as outlined in Part B of the Higher Educations Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2021, that TEQSA will have regard to in relation to an entity or provider that is registered in, or is seeking registration for, the Australian University category.

    Will TEQSA be proposing a legislative instrument for the University College category?

    No. TEQSA’s power to make the legislative instrument is specifically tied to assessing the quality of research undertaken by a provider which is registered, or applies to be registered, in the Australian University category. As such, TEQSA can not and will not be proposing a legislative instrument for the University College category.

    Why has TEQSA not defined several terms in the determination? 

    While TEQSA also considered the inclusion of definitions for other terms in the determination, TEQSA concluded that the relevant terms have a generally accepted plain language meaning and do not require specific definitions.

    Why does this determination not include TEQSA’s broader approach to assessing research?

    During the consultation, several submissions raised broader issues about TEQSA’s approach to assessing research. These included questions about how TEQSA will map fields of research and fields of education, whether the determination would lead to the duplication of existing data collections, whether TEQSA would provide a pathway for prospective entrants to the Australian University category to undertake an ERA-like assessment, and TEQSA’s approach to collecting information about the matters in the determination.

    These broader issues go beyond the purpose of the determination, which is to describe matters which TEQSA must consider when assessing the quality of research at a regulated entity. However, TEQSA will continue to work closely with the higher education sector to ensure that its approach to assessments covered by the determination is clear and avoids duplication. TEQSA will place particular emphasis on existing assessments (including ERA) and data collections, and will calibrate its approach to each regulated entity by reference to the entity’s maturity and risk profile.

    See also:

    Last updated:
  • Contact us

    webform instance
    If you're a student or work for a provider, enter its name here