• Accreditation 8 April 2016

    Provider: Nan Tien Institute Limited

    Course: Graduate Diploma in Applied Buddhist Studies

    Course accreditation

    Report on accreditation of three higher education courses of study offered by Nan Tien Institute Limited

    A delegate of TEQSA has accredited, under section 49 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act), the following higher education courses of study offered by Nan Tien Institute Limited for a period of seven years until 7 April 2023:

    • Graduate Certificate in Applied Buddhist Studies
    • Graduate Diploma in Applied Buddhist Studies
    • Master of Arts (Applied Buddhist Studies)

    Main reasons for decision

    TEQSA has determined that the three higher education pathway courses of study submitted by Nan Tien Institute Limited for renewal of accreditation comply with the Provider Course Accreditation Standards and arrangements for delivery at all Australian sites.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID0585
  • Re-accreditation 12 March 2015

    Provider: S P Jain School of Global Management Pty Limited

    Course: Master of Business Administration (Global)

    Renewal of course accreditation

    Report on renewal of accreditation of three higher education courses of study offered by SP Jain School of Global Management

    A delegate of TEQSA has renewed the accreditation, under section 56 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act), of the following higher education course(s) of study offered by SP Jain School of Global Management Pty Ltd (SP Jain) for a period of five years until 12 March 2020:

    • Bachelor of Business Administration (BBA)
    • MBA Global (GMBA)
    • MBA Executive (EMBA)

    TEQSA has, under subsection 53(1) of the TEQSA Act, imposed conditions on the accreditation of the above courses of study.

    • condition 1 is imposed on the accreditation of MBA Global, MBA Executive and BBA
    • condition 2 is imposed on the BBA
    • conditions 3-5 are imposed on the accreditation of the MBA Global

    Condition 1:

    By 31 May 2015, modify the learning outcomes for the BBA, MBA Global and MBA Executive, and provide the modified learning outcomes to TEQSA, so that the learning outcomes:

    a) directly align with individual units and assessment methods to ensure that the units (including all pre-term units), achieve the expected learning outcomes and are consistently applied across each delivery site; and

    b) are written in accordance with appropriate AQF descriptors at level 7 and 9 respectively.

    Condition 2:

    By 31 May 2015, provide a detailed teaching profile for its Sydney operations for the BBA, including:

    a) the qualifications and professional experience of all teaching staff and subjects they are teaching; and

    b) the staff to student ratios for the final two years of the BBA delivered in Sydney

    Condition 3:

    By 31 May 2015, provide evidence that support for students undertaking the MBA Global Core Project Unit across its three delivery sites includes:

    a) consistent transnational student supervision by Faculty staff at each delivery site; and

    b) appropriate in-country industry partners at each delivery site

    Condition 4:

    By 30 April 2015 identify and engage an appropriately qualified independent academic expert with knowledge of on-line pedagogy to undertake a review of the pre-term units for the MBA Global. Prior to engaging the academic expert, SP Jain must give TEQSA not less than seven days' notice of the expert SP Jain proposes to engage and provide a short summary of the relevant expertise and experience of the nominated expert. TEQSA may notify SP Jain that it is not satisfied that the nominated expert is appropriate, in which case TEQSA will provide a shortlist of no less than three suitable alternative experts and SP Jain must engage one of the shortlisted alternatives. The review must encompass the following:

    a) assessment of the pre-term unit content

    b) assessment of the delivery mode and the efficacy of the McGraw Hill Platform at MBA level

    c) consideration of the proposed learning outcomes

    d) analysis of the assessment tasks and the final examination prescribed for the pre-term units

    e) student preparedness for completing the MBA Global in a 12 month period.

    Condition 5:

    By 30 June 2015 submit the external academic expert's review findings (as outlined in 4 a-e above) as well as a response to the review findings by the SP Jain Academic Board, and details of any action items planned as part of the response.

    The course accreditation covers delivery at all Australian sites, and the SP Jain delivery sites in Dubai and Singapore.

    Main Reasons for the Decision

    TEQSA considers that the decision to apply conditions to SP Jain application for accreditation of three courses of study is consistent with the basic principles for regulation in Part 2 of the TEQSA Act, as SP Jain is at risk of not complying with a number of the Threshold Standards. TEQSA considers that the risks of non-compliance with the Threshold Standards involve a number of matters that may affect SP Jain's capacity to manage and deliver its higher education awards.

    • The broad issues which relate to the Bachelor of Business Administration (BBA) include:

      a) Learning outcomes will be modified so that they are applied consistently across each unit of study and align with AQF descriptors.

      b) SP Jain will provide clarification on the qualifications and professional experience of all teaching staff in relation to the subjects / units of specialisation they are teaching.

    • The broad issues which relate to the MBA Global (GMBA) include:

      a) Learning outcomes will be modified so that they are applied consistently across each unit of study and align with AQF descriptors.

      b) SP Jain is required to demonstrate that it has consistent transnational student supervision by Faculty staff at each delivery site for its GMBA core projects.

      c) A review will be conducted to ensure SP Jain has adequate on-line pedagogy, to safeguard the quality of its on-line learning platform for GMBA students.

    • The broad issues which relate to the MBA Executive (EMBA) include:

      a) Learning outcomes will be modified so that they are applied consistently across each unit of study and align with AQF descriptors.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Re-accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID0586
  • Accreditation 29 May 2017

    Provider: Holmesglen Institute (formerly Holmesglen Institute of TAFE)

    Course: Bachelor of Information Systems

    Course accreditation

    Report on accreditation of one higher education course of study offered by Holmesglen Institute

    A delegate of TEQSA has accredited, under section 49 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act), the following higher education course of study offered by Holmesglen Institute for a period of seven years until 29 May 2024:

    • Bachelor of Information Systems

    Main reasons for decision

    TEQSA has determined that the one higher education course of study submitted by Holmesglen Institute for accreditation complies with the Provider Course Accreditation Standards and arrangements for delivery at all Australian sites.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID0939
  • Re-accreditation 20 March 2017

    Provider: Melbourne Polytechnic (formerly Northern Melbourne Institute of TAFE)

    Course: Bachelor of Information Technology

    Renewal of course accreditation

    Report on renewal of accreditation of two higher education courses of study offered by Melbourne Polytechnic.

    A delegate of TEQSA has renewed the accreditation, under section 56 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act), of the following higher education courses of study offered by Melbourne Polytechnic for a period of four years from the date of decision:

    • Bachelor of Information Technology
    • Associate Degree of Information Technology

    TEQSA has, under subsection 53(1) of the TEQSA Act, imposed two conditions on the accreditation of the above courses of study.

    Condition 1

    Melbourne Polytechnic must arrange for an independent and external review of student attrition within the Bachelor of Information Technology and the Associate Degree of Information Technology. This external review must include consideration of a possible correlation between student attrition and English language entry requirements. The external review must culminate in a report developed and signed by the independent external reviewer. Melbourne Polytechnic must obtain TEQSA's approval of the reviewer and the review's terms of reference before making an appointment. The report arising from the review must be provided to TEQSA and Melbourne Polytechnic simultaneously and not later than 30 September 2017. Within four weeks of receipt of the report on its attrition Melbourne Polytechnic must provide to TEQSA:

    a) a copy of the minutes of the Academic Board meeting which record the Academic Board's response to the report

    b) a proposed implementation plan to address the recommendations in the report.

    Condition 2

    Melbourne Polytechnic must provide to TEQSA:

    a) a report on its student performance that:

    i. compares and contrasts progression and completion rates and grade distributions at an aggregate level between students enrolled in the revised first year of the courses and the previous cohort. Calculations must be based on the methodology set out within the TEQSA Risk Assessment Framework (Version 2.1).

    ii. identifies actions recommended by the Academic Board in response to student performance and an analysis of the effectiveness of those actions.

    b) evidence by way of meeting minutes that the report has been considered by the relevant Melbourne Polytechnic governing bodies which includes any action in response to the report.

    This report is due to TEQSA by 31 March 2018.

    The course accreditation covers delivery at all Australian sites.

    Main Reasons for the Decision

    TEQSA considers that the decision to apply conditions to Melbourne Polytechnic's application for accreditation of two courses of study is consistent with the basic principles for regulation in Part 2 of the TEQSA Act, as Melbourne Polytechnic is at risk of not complying with a number of the Threshold Standards. TEQSA considers that the risks of non-compliance with the Threshold Standards involve a number of matters that may affect Melbourne Polytechnic's capacity to manage and deliver its higher education awards.

    • The broad issues which relate to the Bachelor of Information Technology and the Associate Degree of Information Technology include:

      a) Provider Course Accreditation Standards (PCAS) 1.2 in relation to the existence of robust internal processes for design and approval of the course of study.

      b) PCAS 2.1 in relation to the overall resourcing of course of study.

      c) PCAS 2.4 in relation to the provision of accurate and current information and advice about the course of study is provided to prospective and current students.

      d) PCAS 3.2 in relation to ensuring admission criteria are designed to ensure that all students admitted are sufficiently competent in the English language to be able to achieve the course learning outcomes.

      e) PCAS 5.5 in relation to benchmarking against similar accredited courses.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Re-accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID0940
  • Re-accreditation 20 March 2017

    Provider: Melbourne Polytechnic (formerly Northern Melbourne Institute of TAFE)

    Course: Associate Degree of Information Technology

    Renewal of course accreditation

    Report on renewal of accreditation of two higher education courses of study offered by Melbourne Polytechnic.

    A delegate of TEQSA has renewed the accreditation, under section 56 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act), of the following higher education courses of study offered by Melbourne Polytechnic for a period of four years from the date of decision:

    • Bachelor of Information Technology
    • Associate Degree of Information Technology

    TEQSA has, under subsection 53(1) of the TEQSA Act, imposed two conditions on the accreditation of the above courses of study.

    Condition 1

    Melbourne Polytechnic must arrange for an independent and external review of student attrition within the Bachelor of Information Technology and the Associate Degree of Information Technology. This external review must include consideration of a possible correlation between student attrition and English language entry requirements. The external review must culminate in a report developed and signed by the independent external reviewer. Melbourne Polytechnic must obtain TEQSA's approval of the reviewer and the review's terms of reference before making an appointment. The report arising from the review must be provided to TEQSA and Melbourne Polytechnic simultaneously and not later than 30 September 2017. Within four weeks of receipt of the report on its attrition Melbourne Polytechnic must provide to TEQSA:

    a) a copy of the minutes of the Academic Board meeting which record the Academic Board's response to the report

    b) a proposed implementation plan to address the recommendations in the report.

    Condition 2

    Melbourne Polytechnic must provide to TEQSA:

    a) a report on its student performance that:

    i. compares and contrasts progression and completion rates and grade distributions at an aggregate level between students enrolled in the revised first year of the courses and the previous cohort. Calculations must be based on the methodology set out within the TEQSA Risk Assessment Framework (Version 2.1).

    ii. identifies actions recommended by the Academic Board in response to student performance and an analysis of the effectiveness of those actions.

    b) evidence by way of meeting minutes that the report has been considered by the relevant Melbourne Polytechnic governing bodies which includes any action in response to the report.

    This report is due to TEQSA by 31 March 2018.

    The course accreditation covers delivery at all Australian sites.

    Main Reasons for the Decision

    TEQSA considers that the decision to apply conditions to Melbourne Polytechnic's application for accreditation of two courses of study is consistent with the basic principles for regulation in Part 2 of the TEQSA Act, as Melbourne Polytechnic is at risk of not complying with a number of the Threshold Standards. TEQSA considers that the risks of non-compliance with the Threshold Standards involve a number of matters that may affect Melbourne Polytechnic's capacity to manage and deliver its higher education awards.

    • The broad issues which relate to the Bachelor of Information Technology and the Associate Degree of Information Technology include:

      a) Provider Course Accreditation Standards (PCAS) 1.2 in relation to the existence of robust internal processes for design and approval of the course of study.

      b) PCAS 2.1 in relation to the overall resourcing of course of study.

      c) PCAS 2.4 in relation to the provision of accurate and current information and advice about the course of study is provided to prospective and current students.

      d) PCAS 3.2 in relation to ensuring admission criteria are designed to ensure that all students admitted are sufficiently competent in the English language to be able to achieve the course learning outcomes.

      e) PCAS 5.5 in relation to benchmarking against similar accredited courses.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Re-accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID0941
  • Re-accreditation 17 February 2017

    Provider: Melbourne Polytechnic (formerly Northern Melbourne Institute of TAFE)

    Course: Associate Degree of Veterinary Nursing

    Renewal of course accreditation

    Report on renewal of accreditation of one higher education course of study offered by Melbourne Polytechnic

    A delegate of TEQSA has renewed the accreditation under section 49 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act), the following higher education course of study offered by Melbourne Polytechnic for a period of seven years until 16 February 2024.

    • Associate Degree of Veterinary Nursing

    Main reasons for decision

    TEQSA has determined that the higher education courses of study submitted by Melbourne Polytechnic for re-accreditation complies with the Provider Course Accreditation Standards and arrangements for delivery at all Australian sites.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Re-accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID0942
  • Revoke-Vary Conditions 27 April 2017

    Provider: William Angliss Institute of TAFE

    Course: Master of Philosophy (Major Thesis)

    Revoke/Vary Conditions

    Report on revocation of condition of accreditation of two higher education courses of study offered by William Angliss Institute

    On 27 April 2017 a delegate of TEQSA revoked under section 53(2) of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act), Condition One imposed on the accreditation of the following higher education courses of study offered by William Angliss Institute (refer public report 30 November 2016):

    • Master of Philosophy (Major Thesis)
    • Master of Philosophy (Praxis and Exegesis)

    The decision to revoke the condition was made on the basis that TEQSA was satisfied that the condition had been met.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Vary/Revoke Conditions
    Decision ID
    ID0944
  • Revoke-Vary Conditions 27 April 2017

    Provider: William Angliss Institute of TAFE

    Course: Master of Philosophy (Praxis and Exegesis)

    Revoke/Vary Conditions

    Report on revocation of condition of accreditation of two higher education courses of study offered by William Angliss Institute

    On 27 April 2017 a delegate of TEQSA revoked under section 53(2) of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act), Condition One imposed on the accreditation of the following higher education courses of study offered by William Angliss Institute (refer public report 30 November 2016):

    • Master of Philosophy (Major Thesis)
    • Master of Philosophy (Praxis and Exegesis)

    The decision to revoke the condition was made on the basis that TEQSA was satisfied that the condition had been met.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Vary/Revoke Conditions
    Decision ID
    ID0945
  • Re-accreditation 23 December 2016

    Provider: Montessori World Educational Institute (Australia) Inc

    Course: Graduate Diploma of Education (Montessori)

    Renewal of course accreditation

    Report on renewal of accreditation of one higher education course of study offered by Montessori World Educational Institute (Australia) Inc

    A delegate of TEQSA has renewed the accreditation, under Section 56 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act), of the following higher education course of study offered by Montessori World Educational Institute (Australia) Inc for a period of seven years until 23 December 2023:

    • Graduate Diploma of Education (Montessori)

    Main reasons for decision

    TEQSA has determined that the higher education course of study submitted by Montessori World Educational Institute (Australia) Inc for renewal of accreditation complies with the Provider Course Accreditation Standards and arrangements for delivery at all Australian sites.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Re-accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID0946