• Accreditation 28 May 2019

    Provider: Technical and Further Education Commission

    Course: Graduate Diploma of Financial Planning

    Course accreditation

    Report on accreditation of two higher education courses of study offered by the Technical and Further Commission

    On 28 May 2019, a delegate of TEQSA accredited, under section 49 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (TEQSA Act), the following courses offered by the Technical and Further Commission, for a period of seven years until 28 May 2026:

    • Graduate Diploma of Financial Planning
    • Graduate Certificate in Financial Planning (Professional Practice).

    Main reasons for the decision

    TEQSA made this decision on the basis that it was satisfied that the courses submitted by the Technical and Further Commission for accreditation meets the Provider Course Accreditation Standards of the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2015.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID1773
  • Accreditation 28 May 2019

    Provider: Technical and Further Education Commission

    Course: Graduate Certificate in Financial Planning (Professional Practice)

    Course accreditation

    Report on accreditation of two higher education courses of study offered by the Technical and Further Commission

    On 28 May 2019, a delegate of TEQSA accredited, under section 49 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (TEQSA Act), the following courses offered by the Technical and Further Commission, for a period of seven years until 28 May 2026:

    • Graduate Diploma of Financial Planning
    • Graduate Certificate in Financial Planning (Professional Practice).

    Main reasons for the decision

    TEQSA made this decision on the basis that it was satisfied that the courses submitted by the Technical and Further Commission for accreditation meets the Provider Course Accreditation Standards of the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2015.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID1774
  • Accreditation 27 June 2019

    Provider: The Australasian College of Dermatologists

    Course: Master of Cosmetic Dermatology

    Course accreditation

    Report on accreditation of two higher education courses of study offered by The Australasian College of Dermatologists

    On 27 June 2019, a delegate of TEQSA accredited, under section 49 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (TEQSA Act), the following courses offered by The Australasian College of Dermatologists, for a period of seven years until 27 June 2026.

    • Master of Cosmetic Dermatology
    • Graduate Diploma of Cosmetic Dermatology

    Main reasons for the decision

    TEQSA made this decision on the basis that it was satisfied that the courses submitted by The Australasian College of Dermatology for accreditation meet the Provider Course Accreditation Standards of the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2015.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID1775
  • Accreditation 27 June 2019

    Provider: The Australasian College of Dermatologists

    Course: Graduate Diploma in Cosmetic Dermatology

    Course accreditation

    Report on accreditation of two higher education courses of study offered by The Australasian College of Dermatologists

    On 27 June 2019, a delegate of TEQSA accredited, under section 49 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (TEQSA Act), the following courses offered by The Australasian College of Dermatologists, for a period of seven years until 27 June 2026.

    • Master of Cosmetic Dermatology
    • Graduate Diploma of Cosmetic Dermatology

    Main reasons for the decision

    TEQSA made this decision on the basis that it was satisfied that the courses submitted by The Australasian College of Dermatology for accreditation meet the Provider Course Accreditation Standards of the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2015.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID1776
  • Revoke course condition 12 February 2019

    Provider: TAFE SA

    Course: Graduate Certificate in Entrepreneurship

    Revocation of accreditation condition

    Report on revocation of a condition imposed on accreditation of two higher education courses of study offered by TAFE SA

    On 12 February 2019 a delegate of TEQSA revoked, under section 53 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (TEQSA Act), Condition 1 imposed on the accreditation of the following courses offered by TAFE SA (refer public report of 27 June 2018):

    • Graduate Certificate in Entrepreneurship
    • Graduate Diploma of Entrepreneurship

    Main reasons for the decision

    TEQSA made this decision on the basis that it was satisfied that the condition was no longer necessary.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Vary/Revoke Conditions
    Decision ID
    ID1777
  • Cancel accreditation 19 September 2019

    Provider: Institute of Health & Management Pty Ltd

    Course: Graduate Certificate in Nursing (Program For Internationally Qualified Nurses)

    Cancellation of accreditation

    Report on application to cancel accreditation by Institute of Health & Management Pty Ltd

    A delegate has determined, under section 99 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011, to cancel the course accreditation of the Graduate Certificate in Nursing (Program for Internationally Qualified Nurses) (CRS1400422), with effect from 19 September 2019.

    Main reasons for the decision

    The course accreditation was cancelled by mutual agreement between TEQSA and Institute of Health & Management Pty Ltd on the basis that the course will not be delivered.

    The main reasons for cancellation are on the basis that the provider has not obtained professional accreditation for the course by the relevant professional body. Therefore, the course does not meet Standard 3.1.5 of Part A of the Threshold Standards.

    The delegate is satisfied that no enrolments have been accepted and that the provider has not commenced delivery of the course.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID1832
  • Registration and accreditation 6 September 2019

    Provider: Universal Higher Education Pty Ltd

    Registration

    Report on registration Universal Higher Education Pty Ltd

    TEQSA has agreed to orders made by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) under which Universal Higher Education Pty Ltd (UHE) is registered pursuant to section 21 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act) for a period of five years until 31 August 2024 in the provider category of Higher Education Provider.

    The AAT orders also provide for the accreditation of the Bachelor of Information Technology and the Bachelor of Multinational Film Production courses to be offered by UHE, pursuant to section 49 of the TEQSA Act, and for two conditions to be imposed on UHE's registration pursuant to section 32 of the TEQSA Act. A copy of the conditions is available at Attachment 1.

    Background

    UHE applied to TEQSA for registration in the category of Higher Education Provider under Part 3 of the TEQSA Act.

    TEQSA considered UHE's application and provided two draft assessment reports with details of the assessment of UHE's applications by the responsible assessment team. TEQSA's Commission considered UHE's response to the draft reports and made a decision to reject UHE's application for registration on 20 December 2018 on the basis that it was not satisfied that UHE met the Threshold Standards.

    UHE applied for review of TEQSA's decision in the AAT. In the course of the proceedings, UHE made submissions and provided further information and evidence about the matters raised in TEQSA's decisions.

    It is well established that absent a specific legislative provision to the contrary, the AAT is generally required to make a decision on review based on the evidence available at the time of the AAT's decision on review, and that the AAT is not confined to the evidence available at the time of the primary decision. Accordingly, TEQSA accepted that the AAT was required to take account of the further material submitted to TEQSA after TEQSA had rejected UHE's applications.

    Main reasons for the decision

    After reviewing the further material submitted by UHE, TEQSA was satisfied that UHE meets the Threshold Standards. However, TEQSA considered that there remained a number of risks related to UHE's capacity to meet the Threshold Standards in the future.

    On this basis, TEQSA agreed that it was appropriate to substitute TEQSA's initial rejection of the applications with decisions to register UHE for a period until 31 August 2024, to accredit UHE's Bachelor of Information Technology and Bachelor of Multinational Film Development courses for the same period, and to impose two conditions on UHE's registration.

    The conditions are designed to address the need for UHE to:

    1. Ensure the academic staffing profile for each course of study provides the level and extent of academic oversight and teaching capacity needed to lead students in intellectual inquiry suited to the nature and level of expected learning outcomes. (Standard 3.2.2)

    TEQSA is satisfied that these conditions will provide an appropriate framework for TEQSA to oversee UHE's approach to dealing with this issue.

    Application to withdraw conditions

    In accordance with section 32 of the TEQSA Act, TEQSA may vary or revoke a condition imposed on the registration of a higher education provider, either on its own initiative or upon application by the provider for variation or revocation.

    Attachment 1

    Pursuant to section 32 of the TEQSA Act, the following conditions are imposed on the registration of UHE as a higher education provider under the TEQSA Act:

    Condition 1: Dean, Information Technology

    UHE must not enrol students in, or commence delivery of, the Bachelor of Information Technology until TEQSA notifies the provider that TEQSA is satisfied a suitably qualified person has been appointed to the position of Dean, Information Technology. The appointment must be made in accordance with UHE's Workforce Plan and the following evidence must be supplied to TEQSA for its review:

    1. Curriculum vitae; and
    2. Signed employment agreement (once TEQSA has confirmed the candidate is suitably qualified)

    Condition 2: Staffing

    UHE must provide TEQSA, not later than four weeks prior to delivery, with a report which, for every unit which it plans to offer in one of its higher education courses, sets out:

    1. The title of the unit;
    2. The staff member(s) proposed to teach the unit and, for each staff member:
      1. the highest qualification in the discipline of the course being taught;
      2. the professional experience held;
      3. to the extent that the staff member does not have a qualification in a relevant discipline at least one Australian Qualifications Framework level above the course in which they are proposed to teach, a summary of the basis on which UHE has assessed that individual as having knowledge, skills and the capacity to apply knowledge and skills equivalent to such a qualification; and
      4. whether the staff member is employed on a full-time, part-time or casual basis and, if the staff member is employed on a part-time or casual basis, the staff member's expected fraction of full-time employment.
    Condition
    Decision Type
    Registration
    Decision ID
    ID1833
  • Registration and accreditation 06 September 2019

    Provider: Universal Higher Education Pty Ltd

    Course: Bachelor of Information Technology

    Registration

    Report on registration Universal Higher Education Pty Ltd

    TEQSA has agreed to orders made by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) under which Universal Higher Education Pty Ltd (UHE) is registered pursuant to section 21 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act) for a period of five years until 31 August 2024 in the provider category of Higher Education Provider.

    The AAT orders also provide for the accreditation of the Bachelor of Information Technology and the Bachelor of Multinational Film Production courses to be offered by UHE, pursuant to section 49 of the TEQSA Act, and for two conditions to be imposed on UHE's registration pursuant to section 32 of the TEQSA Act. A copy of the conditions is available at Attachment 1.

    Background

    UHE applied to TEQSA for registration in the category of Higher Education Provider under Part 3 of the TEQSA Act.

    TEQSA considered UHE's application and provided two draft assessment reports with details of the assessment of UHE's applications by the responsible assessment team. TEQSA's Commission considered UHE's response to the draft reports and made a decision to reject UHE's application for registration on 20 December 2018 on the basis that it was not satisfied that UHE met the Threshold Standards.

    UHE applied for review of TEQSA's decision in the AAT. In the course of the proceedings, UHE made submissions and provided further information and evidence about the matters raised in TEQSA's decisions.

    It is well established that absent a specific legislative provision to the contrary, the AAT is generally required to make a decision on review based on the evidence available at the time of the AAT's decision on review, and that the AAT is not confined to the evidence available at the time of the primary decision. Accordingly, TEQSA accepted that the AAT was required to take account of the further material submitted to TEQSA after TEQSA had rejected UHE's applications.

    Main reasons for the decision

    After reviewing the further material submitted by UHE, TEQSA was satisfied that UHE meets the Threshold Standards. However, TEQSA considered that there remained a number of risks related to UHE's capacity to meet the Threshold Standards in the future.

    On this basis, TEQSA agreed that it was appropriate to substitute TEQSA's initial rejection of the applications with decisions to register UHE for a period until 31 August 2024, to accredit UHE's Bachelor of Information Technology and Bachelor of Multinational Film Development courses for the same period, and to impose two conditions on UHE's registration.

    The conditions are designed to address the need for UHE to:

    1. Ensure the academic staffing profile for each course of study provides the level and extent of academic oversight and teaching capacity needed to lead students in intellectual inquiry suited to the nature and level of expected learning outcomes. (Standard 3.2.2)

    TEQSA is satisfied that these conditions will provide an appropriate framework for TEQSA to oversee UHE's approach to dealing with this issue.

    Application to withdraw conditions

    In accordance with section 32 of the TEQSA Act, TEQSA may vary or revoke a condition imposed on the registration of a higher education provider, either on its own initiative or upon application by the provider for variation or revocation.

    Attachment 1

    Pursuant to section 32 of the TEQSA Act, the following conditions are imposed on the registration of UHE as a higher education provider under the TEQSA Act:

    Condition 1: Dean, Information Technology

    UHE must not enrol students in, or commence delivery of, the Bachelor of Information Technology until TEQSA notifies the provider that TEQSA is satisfied a suitably qualified person has been appointed to the position of Dean, Information Technology. The appointment must be made in accordance with UHE's Workforce Plan and the following evidence must be supplied to TEQSA for its review:

    1. Curriculum vitae; and
    2. Signed employment agreement (once TEQSA has confirmed the candidate is suitably qualified)

    Condition 2: Staffing

    UHE must provide TEQSA, not later than four weeks prior to delivery, with a report which, for every unit which it plans to offer in one of its higher education courses, sets out:

    1. The title of the unit;
    2. The staff member(s) proposed to teach the unit and, for each staff member:
      1. the highest qualification in the discipline of the course being taught;
      2. the professional experience held;
      3. to the extent that the staff member does not have a qualification in a relevant discipline at least one Australian Qualifications Framework level above the course in which they are proposed to teach, a summary of the basis on which UHE has assessed that individual as having knowledge, skills and the capacity to apply knowledge and skills equivalent to such a qualification; and
      4. whether the staff member is employed on a full-time, part-time or casual basis and, if the staff member is employed on a part-time or casual basis, the staff member's expected fraction of full-time employment.
    Decision
    Decision Type
    Accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID1834
  • Registration and accreditation 06 September 2019

    Provider: Universal Higher Education Pty Ltd

    Course: Bachelor of Multinational Film Production

    Registration

    Report on registration Universal Higher Education Pty Ltd

    TEQSA has agreed to orders made by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) under which Universal Higher Education Pty Ltd (UHE) is registered pursuant to section 21 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act) for a period of five years until 31 August 2024 in the provider category of Higher Education Provider.

    The AAT orders also provide for the accreditation of the Bachelor of Information Technology and the Bachelor of Multinational Film Production courses to be offered by UHE, pursuant to section 49 of the TEQSA Act, and for two conditions to be imposed on UHE's registration pursuant to section 32 of the TEQSA Act. A copy of the conditions is available at Attachment 1.

    Background

    UHE applied to TEQSA for registration in the category of Higher Education Provider under Part 3 of the TEQSA Act.

    TEQSA considered UHE's application and provided two draft assessment reports with details of the assessment of UHE's applications by the responsible assessment team. TEQSA's Commission considered UHE's response to the draft reports and made a decision to reject UHE's application for registration on 20 December 2018 on the basis that it was not satisfied that UHE met the Threshold Standards.

    UHE applied for review of TEQSA's decision in the AAT. In the course of the proceedings, UHE made submissions and provided further information and evidence about the matters raised in TEQSA's decisions.

    It is well established that absent a specific legislative provision to the contrary, the AAT is generally required to make a decision on review based on the evidence available at the time of the AAT's decision on review, and that the AAT is not confined to the evidence available at the time of the primary decision. Accordingly, TEQSA accepted that the AAT was required to take account of the further material submitted to TEQSA after TEQSA had rejected UHE's applications.

    Main reasons for the decision

    After reviewing the further material submitted by UHE, TEQSA was satisfied that UHE meets the Threshold Standards. However, TEQSA considered that there remained a number of risks related to UHE's capacity to meet the Threshold Standards in the future.

    On this basis, TEQSA agreed that it was appropriate to substitute TEQSA's initial rejection of the applications with decisions to register UHE for a period until 31 August 2024, to accredit UHE's Bachelor of Information Technology and Bachelor of Multinational Film Development courses for the same period, and to impose two conditions on UHE's registration.

    The conditions are designed to address the need for UHE to:

    1. Ensure the academic staffing profile for each course of study provides the level and extent of academic oversight and teaching capacity needed to lead students in intellectual inquiry suited to the nature and level of expected learning outcomes. (Standard 3.2.2)

    TEQSA is satisfied that these conditions will provide an appropriate framework for TEQSA to oversee UHE's approach to dealing with this issue.

    Application to withdraw conditions

    In accordance with section 32 of the TEQSA Act, TEQSA may vary or revoke a condition imposed on the registration of a higher education provider, either on its own initiative or upon application by the provider for variation or revocation.

    Attachment 1

    Pursuant to section 32 of the TEQSA Act, the following conditions are imposed on the registration of UHE as a higher education provider under the TEQSA Act:

    Condition 1: Dean, Information Technology

    UHE must not enrol students in, or commence delivery of, the Bachelor of Information Technology until TEQSA notifies the provider that TEQSA is satisfied a suitably qualified person has been appointed to the position of Dean, Information Technology. The appointment must be made in accordance with UHE's Workforce Plan and the following evidence must be supplied to TEQSA for its review:

    1. Curriculum vitae; and
    2. Signed employment agreement (once TEQSA has confirmed the candidate is suitably qualified)

    Condition 2: Staffing

    UHE must provide TEQSA, not later than four weeks prior to delivery, with a report which, for every unit which it plans to offer in one of its higher education courses, sets out:

    1. The title of the unit;
    2. The staff member(s) proposed to teach the unit and, for each staff member:
      1. the highest qualification in the discipline of the course being taught;
      2. the professional experience held;
      3. to the extent that the staff member does not have a qualification in a relevant discipline at least one Australian Qualifications Framework level above the course in which they are proposed to teach, a summary of the basis on which UHE has assessed that individual as having knowledge, skills and the capacity to apply knowledge and skills equivalent to such a qualification; and
      4. whether the staff member is employed on a full-time, part-time or casual basis and, if the staff member is employed on a part-time or casual basis, the staff member's expected fraction of full-time employment.
    Decision
    Decision Type
    Accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID1835