• Revoke registration condition 13 June 2019

    Provider: National Institute of Organisation Dynamics Australia Ltd

    Revocation of registration condition

    Report on revocation of a condition imposed on registration of the National Institute of Organisation Dynamics Australia Ltd

    On 13 June 2019 a delegate of TEQSA revoked, under section 32 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (TEQSA Act), Condition 3 imposed on the registration of the National Institute of Organisation Dynamics Australia Ltd (refer public report of 13 October 2016).

    Main reasons for the decision

    TEQSA made this decision on the basis that the condition was no longer necessary.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Vary/Revoke Conditions
    Decision ID
    ID1714
  • Impose condition on registration 19 June 2019

    Provider: Elite Education Institute Pty. Ltd.

    Condition

    Report on imposition of one condition on the CRICOS registration of Elite Education Institute Pty Ltd

    On 19 June 2019, TEQSA:

    • imposed, under paragraph 83(3)(a) of the Education Services for Overseas Students Act 2000, one condition on the registration of Elite Education Institute Pty Ltd.

    Condition 1: Suspension of student enrolments

    From the date on which it is notified of this decision until 31 August 2019, Elite must not enrol or commence any new students in any of its higher education courses.

    Main reasons for the decision

    TEQSA made this decision on the basis that, consistent with paragraphs 83(1C)(b) and (c) of the ESOS Act, TEQSA believes on reasonable grounds that Elite:

    1. does not have the clearly demonstrated capacity to provide education of a satisfactory standard; or
    2. has not been providing, or has not provided, education of a satisfactory standard.

    Specifically, TEQSA holds substantial concerns that Elite Education Institute Pty Ltd:

    1. is not delivering its courses so as to appropriately engage students in the course content in a manner consistent with the form of the course registered under the ESOS Act, and
    2. has not ensured, and will not ensure, that assessment in its higher education courses has the necessary quality and integrity.

    The condition imposes a time-limited restriction on the capacity of Elite Education Institute Pty Ltd to enrol or commence new students, while TEQSA finalises its ongoing investigation of the concerns it has identified.

    Condition
    Decision Type
    Registration
    Decision ID
    ID1715
  • Re-accreditation 7 June 2019

    Provider: CG Spectrum Institute Pty Ltd (formerly Banksia Institute Australia Pty Ltd)

    Course: Graduate Certificate in Emotion Focused Therapy (formerly GC in Emotionally Focused Counselling)

    Renewal of course accreditation

    Report on renewal of accreditation of two higher education courses of study offered by Institute for Emotionally Focused Therapy Pty Ltd

    On 7 June 2019, a delegate of TEQSA:

    • renewed, under section 56 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (TEQSA Act), the accreditation of the following courses offered by Institute for Emotionally Focused Therapy Pty Ltd, for a period of seven years until 7 June 2026:
      • Graduate Certificate in Emotionally Focused Counselling
      • Graduate Diploma of Emotionally Focused Therapy.

    Main reasons for the decision

    TEQSA made this decision on the basis that it was satisfied that the courses submitted by Institute for Emotionally Focused Therapy Pty Ltd for renewal of accreditation continue to meet the Provider Course Accreditation Standards of the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2015.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Re-accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID1716
  • Re-accreditation 7 June 2019

    Provider: CG Spectrum Institute Pty Ltd (formerly Banksia Institute Australia Pty Ltd)

    Course: Graduate Diploma of Emotionally Focused Therapy

    Renewal of course accreditation

    Report on renewal of accreditation of two higher education courses of study offered by Institute for Emotionally Focused Therapy Pty Ltd

    On 7 June 2019, a delegate of TEQSA:

    • renewed, under section 56 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (TEQSA Act), the accreditation of the following courses offered by Institute for Emotionally Focused Therapy Pty Ltd, for a period of seven years until 7 June 2026:
      • Graduate Certificate in Emotionally Focused Counselling
      • Graduate Diploma of Emotionally Focused Therapy.

    Main reasons for the decision

    TEQSA made this decision on the basis that it was satisfied that the courses submitted by Institute for Emotionally Focused Therapy Pty Ltd for renewal of accreditation continue to meet the Provider Course Accreditation Standards of the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2015.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Re-accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID1717
  • Accreditation 21 May 2019

    Provider: Holmes Institute Pty Ltd as Trustee for Holmes Institute Trust

    Course: Master of Information Systems

    Course accreditation

    Report on accreditation of three higher education courses of study offered by Holmes Institute Pty Ltd

    On 21 May 2019, a delegate of TEQSA:

    • accredited, under section 49 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (TEQSA Act), the following courses offered by Holmes Institute Pty Ltd, for a period of four years until 21 May 2023:
      • Master of Information Systems
      • Graduate Diploma of Information Systems
      • Graduate Certificate in Information Systems
    • imposed under section 53 of the TEQSA Act, five conditions on the accreditation of the courses.

    Condition 1: Review of Course Design and Assessment

    1.1 Holmes will engage at its own expense, a suitably qualified independent expert/s (with the agreement of TEQSA as to the identity and terms of reference of the expert/s, in which agreement is not to be unreasonably withheld) to review and produce recommendations to Holmes (Independent Course Review) in relation to the following matters:

    1. Revise the assessment tasks and learning outcomes in all units to ensure that:
      1. the specified learning outcomes are capable of being achieved by each student within the scope of the unit,
      2. the mapping of course level learning outcomes demonstrates alignment of the outcomes with assessments,
      3. the methods of assessment are consistent with the learning outcomes being assessed, and are able to meaningfully assess student performance against all the unit learning outcomes, including the group assessment items.

    1.2 The independent expert/s will:

    1. be suitably qualified to undertake the Independent Course Review
    2. not be a past or present member of Holmes' staff
    3. not have been engaged as a consultant to Holmes, and
    4. not have any conflict of interest.

    1.3 The outcomes of the Independent Course Review are to be reported to Holmes' Academic Board, Board of Directors and TEQSA no later than 21 November 2019.

    1.4 Holmes is to prepare an implementation plan for each of the recommendations in the expert reports, approved by the Academic Board and the Board of Directors, to be provided to TEQSA no later than 20 December 2019.

    1.5 Holmes is to report to TEQSA on the implementation of the outcomes of the Independent Course Review by:

    1. 15 January 2020
    2. Such further dates as TEQSA may require after the Independent Course Review is undertaken.

    Condition 2: Staffing

    2.1. Prior to the commencement of delivery of the courses, Holmes is to provide TEQSA with copies of staff curriculum vitae demonstrating that it has appointed:

    1. a suitable senior academic leader with requisite disciplinary qualifications and experience
    2. appropriately qualified and experienced academic teaching staff for the delivery of the Information Systems courses at all delivery sites that includes details of their disciplinary specialism.

    The response to this condition should also indicate full time and part time status and teaching location of each staff member.

    Condition 3: Offshore delivery

    3.1 Holmes must notify TEQSA of its intention to deliver the course/s offshore at least three (3) months prior to delivery.

    Condition 4: Information to students

    Holmes must provide to TEQSA evidence of accurate and relevant marketing material that clearly sets out the units across all courses, including information about whether or not the courses are accredited by appropriate professional bodies.

    Condition 5

    Holmes must not deliver the courses of study unless TEQSA confirms, in writing, that Conditions 1, 2 and 4 are all met.

    Main reasons for the decision

    TEQSA made the decision in light of risks that the course submitted by Holmes Institute College Pty Limited may not meet, or continue to meet, the following provisions of the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2015:

    1. Section 1.4 of Part A, in relation to learning outcomes and assessment
    2. Section 3.1 of Part A, in relation to course design
    3. Section 3.2 of Part A, in relation to staffing, and
    4. Section 7.1 of Part A, in relation to representation.

    TEQSA's assessment considered Holmes Institute Pty Limited's arrangements for all deliver sites.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID1718
  • Accreditation 21 May 2019

    Provider: Holmes Institute Pty Ltd as Trustee for Holmes Institute Trust

    Course: Graduate Diploma of Information Systems

    Course accreditation

    Report on accreditation of three higher education courses of study offered by Holmes Institute Pty Ltd

    On 21 May 2019, a delegate of TEQSA:

    • accredited, under section 49 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (TEQSA Act), the following courses offered by Holmes Institute Pty Ltd, for a period of four years until 21 May 2023:
      • Master of Information Systems
      • Graduate Diploma of Information Systems
      • Graduate Certificate in Information Systems
    • imposed under section 53 of the TEQSA Act, five conditions on the accreditation of the courses.

    Condition 1: Review of Course Design and Assessment

    1.1 Holmes will engage at its own expense, a suitably qualified independent expert/s (with the agreement of TEQSA as to the identity and terms of reference of the expert/s, in which agreement is not to be unreasonably withheld) to review and produce recommendations to Holmes (Independent Course Review) in relation to the following matters:

    1. Revise the assessment tasks and learning outcomes in all units to ensure that:
      1. the specified learning outcomes are capable of being achieved by each student within the scope of the unit,
      2. the mapping of course level learning outcomes demonstrates alignment of the outcomes with assessments,
      3. the methods of assessment are consistent with the learning outcomes being assessed, and are able to meaningfully assess student performance against all the unit learning outcomes, including the group assessment items.

    1.2 The independent expert/s will:

    1. be suitably qualified to undertake the Independent Course Review
    2. not be a past or present member of Holmes' staff
    3. not have been engaged as a consultant to Holmes, and
    4. not have any conflict of interest.

    1.3 The outcomes of the Independent Course Review are to be reported to Holmes' Academic Board, Board of Directors and TEQSA no later than 21 November 2019.

    1.4 Holmes is to prepare an implementation plan for each of the recommendations in the expert reports, approved by the Academic Board and the Board of Directors, to be provided to TEQSA no later than 20 December 2019.

    1.5 Holmes is to report to TEQSA on the implementation of the outcomes of the Independent Course Review by:

    1. 15 January 2020
    2. Such further dates as TEQSA may require after the Independent Course Review is undertaken.

    Condition 2: Staffing

    2.1. Prior to the commencement of delivery of the courses, Holmes is to provide TEQSA with copies of staff curriculum vitae demonstrating that it has appointed:

    1. a suitable senior academic leader with requisite disciplinary qualifications and experience
    2. appropriately qualified and experienced academic teaching staff for the delivery of the Information Systems courses at all delivery sites that includes details of their disciplinary specialism.

    The response to this condition should also indicate full time and part time status and teaching location of each staff member.

    Condition 3: Offshore delivery

    3.1 Holmes must notify TEQSA of its intention to deliver the course/s offshore at least three (3) months prior to delivery.

    Condition 4: Information to students

    Holmes must provide to TEQSA evidence of accurate and relevant marketing material that clearly sets out the units across all courses, including information about whether or not the courses are accredited by appropriate professional bodies.

    Condition 5

    Holmes must not deliver the courses of study unless TEQSA confirms, in writing, that Conditions 1, 2 and 4 are all met.

    Main reasons for the decision

    TEQSA made the decision in light of risks that the course submitted by Holmes Institute College Pty Limited may not meet, or continue to meet, the following provisions of the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2015:

    1. Section 1.4 of Part A, in relation to learning outcomes and assessment
    2. Section 3.1 of Part A, in relation to course design
    3. Section 3.2 of Part A, in relation to staffing, and
    4. Section 7.1 of Part A, in relation to representation.

    TEQSA's assessment considered Holmes Institute Pty Limited's arrangements for all deliver sites.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID1719
  • Accreditation 21 May 2019

    Provider: Holmes Institute Pty Ltd as Trustee for Holmes Institute Trust

    Course: Graduate Certificate in Information Systems

    Course accreditation

    Report on accreditation of three higher education courses of study offered by Holmes Institute Pty Ltd

    On 21 May 2019, a delegate of TEQSA:

    • accredited, under section 49 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (TEQSA Act), the following courses offered by Holmes Institute Pty Ltd, for a period of four years until 21 May 2023:
      • Master of Information Systems
      • Graduate Diploma of Information Systems
      • Graduate Certificate in Information Systems
    • imposed under section 53 of the TEQSA Act, five conditions on the accreditation of the courses.

    Condition 1: Review of Course Design and Assessment

    1.1 Holmes will engage at its own expense, a suitably qualified independent expert/s (with the agreement of TEQSA as to the identity and terms of reference of the expert/s, in which agreement is not to be unreasonably withheld) to review and produce recommendations to Holmes (Independent Course Review) in relation to the following matters:

    1. Revise the assessment tasks and learning outcomes in all units to ensure that:
      1. the specified learning outcomes are capable of being achieved by each student within the scope of the unit,
      2. the mapping of course level learning outcomes demonstrates alignment of the outcomes with assessments,
      3. the methods of assessment are consistent with the learning outcomes being assessed, and are able to meaningfully assess student performance against all the unit learning outcomes, including the group assessment items.

    1.2 The independent expert/s will:

    1. be suitably qualified to undertake the Independent Course Review
    2. not be a past or present member of Holmes' staff
    3. not have been engaged as a consultant to Holmes, and
    4. not have any conflict of interest.

    1.3 The outcomes of the Independent Course Review are to be reported to Holmes' Academic Board, Board of Directors and TEQSA no later than 21 November 2019.

    1.4 Holmes is to prepare an implementation plan for each of the recommendations in the expert reports, approved by the Academic Board and the Board of Directors, to be provided to TEQSA no later than 20 December 2019.

    1.5 Holmes is to report to TEQSA on the implementation of the outcomes of the Independent Course Review by:

    1. 15 January 2020
    2. Such further dates as TEQSA may require after the Independent Course Review is undertaken.

    Condition 2: Staffing

    2.1. Prior to the commencement of delivery of the courses, Holmes is to provide TEQSA with copies of staff curriculum vitae demonstrating that it has appointed:

    1. a suitable senior academic leader with requisite disciplinary qualifications and experience
    2. appropriately qualified and experienced academic teaching staff for the delivery of the Information Systems courses at all delivery sites that includes details of their disciplinary specialism.

    The response to this condition should also indicate full time and part time status and teaching location of each staff member.

    Condition 3: Offshore delivery

    3.1 Holmes must notify TEQSA of its intention to deliver the course/s offshore at least three (3) months prior to delivery.

    Condition 4: Information to students

    Holmes must provide to TEQSA evidence of accurate and relevant marketing material that clearly sets out the units across all courses, including information about whether or not the courses are accredited by appropriate professional bodies.

    Condition 5

    Holmes must not deliver the courses of study unless TEQSA confirms, in writing, that Conditions 1, 2 and 4 are all met.

    Main reasons for the decision

    TEQSA made the decision in light of risks that the course submitted by Holmes Institute College Pty Limited may not meet, or continue to meet, the following provisions of the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2015:

    1. Section 1.4 of Part A, in relation to learning outcomes and assessment
    2. Section 3.1 of Part A, in relation to course design
    3. Section 3.2 of Part A, in relation to staffing, and
    4. Section 7.1 of Part A, in relation to representation.

    TEQSA's assessment considered Holmes Institute Pty Limited's arrangements for all deliver sites.

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID1720
  • Accreditation 26 June 2019

    Provider: S P Jain School of Global Management Pty Limited

    Course: Master of Artificial Intelligence in Business

    Course accreditation

    Report on accreditation of one higher education course of study offered by S P Jain School of Global Management

    On 26 June 2019, a delegate of TEQSA:

    • accredited, under section 49 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (TEQSA Act), the following course offered by S P Jain School of Global management Pty Ltd, for a period of seven years until 26 June 2026:
      • Master of Artificial Intelligence in Business
    • imposed, under section 53 of the TEQSA Act, three conditions on the accreditation of the Master of artificial Intelligence in Business:

    Prior to marketing or enrolment of students, SP Jain School of Global Management Pty Ltd provide to TEQSA:

    Condition 1

    1. Report of a review of the course addressing the concerns raised by the TEQSA Expert relating to the course content and learning activities in the relevant academic disciplines. The report must demonstrate the review considered the use of benchmarking of appropriate comparator courses to inform the course design specifications and expected learning outcomes consistent with the field of education.
    2. Copies of revised course documentation, including unit outlines and a list of any improvements made.
    3. Copies of meeting minutes of the relevant governance committee demonstrating consideration of the review report and approval of any actions taken or improvements made.

    Condition 2

    1. Copies of revised course information for prospective students which includes adequate details of the course and units of study, prerequisites and assumed knowledge to enable informed decisions about the Master of Artificial Intelligence in Business.

    Condition 3

    1. Evidence of student access to facilities and resources including laboratories, software and analytical platforms relating to the learning outcomes.

    Main reasons for the decision

    TEQSA made these decisions in light of risks that the course submitted by S P Jain School of Global Management Pty Ltd may not meet, or continue to meet, the following provisions of the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2015:

    • Section 1.3 of Part A, in relation to orientation and monitoring progression
    • Section 1.4 of Part A, in relation to learning outcomes and assessment
    • Section 3.1 of Part A, in relation to the course design, content and learning activities
    • Section 3.3 of Part A, in relation to learning resources and educational support.
    • Section 7.2 of Part A in relation to information for prospective and current students
    Decision
    Decision Type
    Accreditation
    Decision ID
    ID1721
  • Withdraw registration 19 June 2019

    Provider: John Paul II Institute for Marriage and Family, Melbourne

    Withdrawal of registration

    Report on application to withdraw registration by the John Paul II Institute for Marriage and Family

    TEQSA has determined, under section 43 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (TEQSA Act), to grant the application from the John Paul II Institute for Marriage and Family to withdraw its registration as a Higher Education Provider, with effect from 30 June 2019.

    Main reasons for the decision

    The reason for the withdrawal is the closure of the Institute. The Institute's Governing Council, mindful of projected trends in sustainability, decided that the Institute would cease operating on 31 December 2018.

    TEQSA is satisfied the Institute has ensured appropriate teach out arrangements prior to the Melbourne campus closing. Students were appropriately notified and supported by the Institute to either complete their courses or transfer into equivalent courses at another higher education provider or students had resolved not to complete an award. All students eligible to complete higher education awards have graduated from the Institute.

    In addition, TEQSA is satisfied there are appropriate arrangements for the retention of student records and replacement certification, which will be managed by the Catholic Theological College who can be contacted via:

    Assistant Dean
    Catholic Theological College
    PO Box 146
    East Melbourne 8022
    assistantdean@ctc.edu.au

    Decision
    Decision Type
    Withdraw Registration
    Decision ID
    ID1722