Course accreditation

Report on accreditation of three higher education courses of study offered by Nan Tien Institute Limited

On 15 August 2013, TEQSA determined to grant accreditation of the following higher education courses of study offered by Nan Tien Institute Limited for a period of seven years until 15 August 2020 in accordance with subsections 49(1) and 49(6) of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (TEQSA Act), subject to conditions:

• Master of Arts (Health and Social Wellbeing)
• Graduate Diploma of Health and Social Wellbeing
• Graduate Certificate in Health and Social Wellbeing

On 15 August 2013, TEQSA imposed, under subsection 52(1) of the TEQSA Act, six conditions on the accreditation of the three courses of study. Refer to the Addendum of this report for information relating to the revocation of the conditions.

Background to Decision

Nan Tien Institute Limited submitted an application for accreditation of three courses of study to the NSW Department of Education and Training (NSW DET) on 2 August 2011. TEQSA subsequently received the application for accreditation under the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Act 2011 (the TEQSA Transition Act). Subsection 45(4) of the TEQSA Act requires a registered higher education provider who is not authorised to self-accredit the course of study to apply to TEQSA for accreditation. Subsection 49(6) enables TEQSA to grant accreditation of a course of study for a period not exceeding seven years.

Main Reasons for the Decision

TEQSA determined that the three higher education courses of study submitted by Nan Tien Institute Limited for accreditation comply with the Provider Course Accreditation Standards. The course accreditation covers delivery at all Australian sites.

TEQSA considers that the decision to apply conditions to accreditation of the three courses of study is consistent with the basic principles for regulation in Part 2 of the TEQSA Act as Nan Tien Institute is at risk of not complying with a number of the Threshold Standards. TEQSA considers that the risks of non-compliance with the Threshold Standards involve a number of matters that may affect Nan Tien Institute's capacity to manage and deliver its higher education awards.

TEQSA imposed the conditions on the accreditation to ensure:

• An appropriate academic body with responsibility for the courses is established.
• The courses are considered by that body prior to any students commencing the courses.
• The way in which the courses meet the relevant AQF application of knowledge and skills descriptors is clarified.
• The courses are not delivered until a senior academic leader is appointed and further evidence of academic workforce planning is provided to TEQSA.
• Funds to teach-out the courses will be available to Nan Tien Institute if required.

Addendum to Public Report on 6 March 2014: Conditions Revoked

On 15 August 2013, TEQSA imposed the following six conditions on the accreditation of the Master of Arts (Health and Social Wellbeing), the Graduate Diploma of Health and Social Wellbeing and the Graduate Certificate in Health and Social Wellbeing:

a) By no later than 30 November 2013, Nan Tien Institute must establish a course advisory committee for the three courses being accredited and provide to TEQSA the terms of reference and membership.

b) Prior to commencing delivery of the courses, Nan Tien Institute must:

1. Ensure that the course advisory committee meets to consider the three courses and provide advice to the Institute, including advice that the courses clearly focus on social wellbeing and developing research skills.
2. Provide to TEQSA a mapping of the three courses against the current AQF level descriptors for application of knowledge and skills.
3. Provide to TEQSA an academic staffing plan for ensuring that appropriately qualified academic staff shall deliver and assess each of the units in the courses, and oversee and assess research projects in the Master of Arts (Health and Social Wellbeing).
4. Engage a head of program whose predominant academic expertise is in health and social wellbeing.
5. Satisfy TEQSA that it has a binding agreement with the International Buddhist Association of Australia or another entity under which the Institute will receive funding to teach out the courses in the event that this is required.

In accordance with subsections 53(2) and 53(3) of the TEQSA Act, TEQSA may vary or revoke a condition imposed on the accreditation of a course of study, either on its own initiative, or upon application by the provider for variation or revocation.

TEQSA made a decision on 6 March 2014 to revoke the six conditions imposed on the accreditation of the three courses.

TEQSA's decision to revoke the six conditions was made on the basis that Nan Tien Institute had demonstrated that the requirements of each of the conditions had been met:

• In response to Condition (a), Nan Tien Institute established a course advisory committee for the three courses, and on 9 October 2013 provided TEQSA with the terms of reference and membership.
• In response to Condition (b)(i), on 24 December 2013, Nan Tien Institute provided to TEQSA evidence that the course advisory committee had met to consider the three courses and provide advice, including advice that the courses clearly focus on social wellbeing and developing research skills.
• In response to Condition (b)(ii), on 9 October 2013 Nan Tien Institute provided TEQSA a mapping of the three courses against the current AQF level descriptors.
• In response to Condition (b)(iii), on 24 December 2013 Nan Tien Institute provided to TEQSA an academic staffing plan for the three courses.
• In response to Condition (b)(iv), on 24 December 2013 Nan Tien Institute provided to TEQSA evidence that a head of program for the three courses had been engaged to commence in January 2014.
• In response to Condition (b)(v), on 7 February 2014, Nan Tien Institute provided to TEQSA evidence of a financial guarantee under which it will receive funding to teach out the courses in the event that this is required.

Course accreditation

Report on accreditation of three higher education courses of study offered by Nan Tien Institute Limited

On 15 August 2013, TEQSA determined to grant accreditation of the following higher education courses of study offered by Nan Tien Institute Limited for a period of seven years until 15 August 2020 in accordance with subsections 49(1) and 49(6) of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (TEQSA Act), subject to conditions:

• Master of Arts (Health and Social Wellbeing)
• Graduate Diploma of Health and Social Wellbeing
• Graduate Certificate in Health and Social Wellbeing

On 15 August 2013, TEQSA imposed, under subsection 52(1) of the TEQSA Act, six conditions on the accreditation of the three courses of study. Refer to the Addendum of this report for information relating to the revocation of the conditions.

Background to Decision

Nan Tien Institute Limited submitted an application for accreditation of three courses of study to the NSW Department of Education and Training (NSW DET) on 2 August 2011. TEQSA subsequently received the application for accreditation under the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Act 2011 (the TEQSA Transition Act). Subsection 45(4) of the TEQSA Act requires a registered higher education provider who is not authorised to self-accredit the course of study to apply to TEQSA for accreditation. Subsection 49(6) enables TEQSA to grant accreditation of a course of study for a period not exceeding seven years.

Main Reasons for the Decision

TEQSA determined that the three higher education courses of study submitted by Nan Tien Institute Limited for accreditation comply with the Provider Course Accreditation Standards. The course accreditation covers delivery at all Australian sites.

TEQSA considers that the decision to apply conditions to accreditation of the three courses of study is consistent with the basic principles for regulation in Part 2 of the TEQSA Act as Nan Tien Institute is at risk of not complying with a number of the Threshold Standards. TEQSA considers that the risks of non-compliance with the Threshold Standards involve a number of matters that may affect Nan Tien Institute's capacity to manage and deliver its higher education awards.

TEQSA imposed the conditions on the accreditation to ensure:

• An appropriate academic body with responsibility for the courses is established.
• The courses are considered by that body prior to any students commencing the courses.
• The way in which the courses meet the relevant AQF application of knowledge and skills descriptors is clarified.
• The courses are not delivered until a senior academic leader is appointed and further evidence of academic workforce planning is provided to TEQSA.
• Funds to teach-out the courses will be available to Nan Tien Institute if required.

Addendum to Public Report on 6 March 2014: Conditions Revoked

On 15 August 2013, TEQSA imposed the following six conditions on the accreditation of the Master of Arts (Health and Social Wellbeing), the Graduate Diploma of Health and Social Wellbeing and the Graduate Certificate in Health and Social Wellbeing:

a) By no later than 30 November 2013, Nan Tien Institute must establish a course advisory committee for the three courses being accredited and provide to TEQSA the terms of reference and membership.

b) Prior to commencing delivery of the courses, Nan Tien Institute must:

1. Ensure that the course advisory committee meets to consider the three courses and provide advice to the Institute, including advice that the courses clearly focus on social wellbeing and developing research skills.
2. Provide to TEQSA a mapping of the three courses against the current AQF level descriptors for application of knowledge and skills.
3. Provide to TEQSA an academic staffing plan for ensuring that appropriately qualified academic staff shall deliver and assess each of the units in the courses, and oversee and assess research projects in the Master of Arts (Health and Social Wellbeing).
4. Engage a head of program whose predominant academic expertise is in health and social wellbeing.
5. Satisfy TEQSA that it has a binding agreement with the International Buddhist Association of Australia or another entity under which the Institute will receive funding to teach out the courses in the event that this is required.

In accordance with subsections 53(2) and 53(3) of the TEQSA Act, TEQSA may vary or revoke a condition imposed on the accreditation of a course of study, either on its own initiative, or upon application by the provider for variation or revocation.

TEQSA made a decision on 6 March 2014 to revoke the six conditions imposed on the accreditation of the three courses.

TEQSA's decision to revoke the six conditions was made on the basis that Nan Tien Institute had demonstrated that the requirements of each of the conditions had been met:

• In response to Condition (a), Nan Tien Institute established a course advisory committee for the three courses, and on 9 October 2013 provided TEQSA with the terms of reference and membership.
• In response to Condition (b)(i), on 24 December 2013, Nan Tien Institute provided to TEQSA evidence that the course advisory committee had met to consider the three courses and provide advice, including advice that the courses clearly focus on social wellbeing and developing research skills.
• In response to Condition (b)(ii), on 9 October 2013 Nan Tien Institute provided TEQSA a mapping of the three courses against the current AQF level descriptors.
• In response to Condition (b)(iii), on 24 December 2013 Nan Tien Institute provided to TEQSA an academic staffing plan for the three courses.
• In response to Condition (b)(iv), on 24 December 2013 Nan Tien Institute provided to TEQSA evidence that a head of program for the three courses had been engaged to commence in January 2014.
• In response to Condition (b)(v), on 7 February 2014, Nan Tien Institute provided to TEQSA evidence of a financial guarantee under which it will receive funding to teach out the courses in the event that this is required.

Course accreditation

Report on accreditation of three higher education courses of study offered by Nan Tien Institute Limited

On 15 August 2013, TEQSA determined to grant accreditation of the following higher education courses of study offered by Nan Tien Institute Limited for a period of seven years until 15 August 2020 in accordance with subsections 49(1) and 49(6) of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (TEQSA Act), subject to conditions:

• Master of Arts (Health and Social Wellbeing)
• Graduate Diploma of Health and Social Wellbeing
• Graduate Certificate in Health and Social Wellbeing

On 15 August 2013, TEQSA imposed, under subsection 52(1) of the TEQSA Act, six conditions on the accreditation of the three courses of study. Refer to the Addendum of this report for information relating to the revocation of the conditions.

Background to Decision

Nan Tien Institute Limited submitted an application for accreditation of three courses of study to the NSW Department of Education and Training (NSW DET) on 2 August 2011. TEQSA subsequently received the application for accreditation under the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Act 2011 (the TEQSA Transition Act). Subsection 45(4) of the TEQSA Act requires a registered higher education provider who is not authorised to self-accredit the course of study to apply to TEQSA for accreditation. Subsection 49(6) enables TEQSA to grant accreditation of a course of study for a period not exceeding seven years.

Main Reasons for the Decision

TEQSA determined that the three higher education courses of study submitted by Nan Tien Institute Limited for accreditation comply with the Provider Course Accreditation Standards. The course accreditation covers delivery at all Australian sites.

TEQSA considers that the decision to apply conditions to accreditation of the three courses of study is consistent with the basic principles for regulation in Part 2 of the TEQSA Act as Nan Tien Institute is at risk of not complying with a number of the Threshold Standards. TEQSA considers that the risks of non-compliance with the Threshold Standards involve a number of matters that may affect Nan Tien Institute's capacity to manage and deliver its higher education awards.

TEQSA imposed the conditions on the accreditation to ensure:

• An appropriate academic body with responsibility for the courses is established.
• The courses are considered by that body prior to any students commencing the courses.
• The way in which the courses meet the relevant AQF application of knowledge and skills descriptors is clarified.
• The courses are not delivered until a senior academic leader is appointed and further evidence of academic workforce planning is provided to TEQSA.
• Funds to teach-out the courses will be available to Nan Tien Institute if required.

Addendum to Public Report on 6 March 2014: Conditions Revoked

On 15 August 2013, TEQSA imposed the following six conditions on the accreditation of the Master of Arts (Health and Social Wellbeing), the Graduate Diploma of Health and Social Wellbeing and the Graduate Certificate in Health and Social Wellbeing:

a) By no later than 30 November 2013, Nan Tien Institute must establish a course advisory committee for the three courses being accredited and provide to TEQSA the terms of reference and membership.

b) Prior to commencing delivery of the courses, Nan Tien Institute must:

1. Ensure that the course advisory committee meets to consider the three courses and provide advice to the Institute, including advice that the courses clearly focus on social wellbeing and developing research skills.
2. Provide to TEQSA a mapping of the three courses against the current AQF level descriptors for application of knowledge and skills.
3. Provide to TEQSA an academic staffing plan for ensuring that appropriately qualified academic staff shall deliver and assess each of the units in the courses, and oversee and assess research projects in the Master of Arts (Health and Social Wellbeing).
4. Engage a head of program whose predominant academic expertise is in health and social wellbeing.
5. Satisfy TEQSA that it has a binding agreement with the International Buddhist Association of Australia or another entity under which the Institute will receive funding to teach out the courses in the event that this is required.

In accordance with subsections 53(2) and 53(3) of the TEQSA Act, TEQSA may vary or revoke a condition imposed on the accreditation of a course of study, either on its own initiative, or upon application by the provider for variation or revocation.

TEQSA made a decision on 6 March 2014 to revoke the six conditions imposed on the accreditation of the three courses.

TEQSA's decision to revoke the six conditions was made on the basis that Nan Tien Institute had demonstrated that the requirements of each of the conditions had been met:

• In response to Condition (a), Nan Tien Institute established a course advisory committee for the three courses, and on 9 October 2013 provided TEQSA with the terms of reference and membership.
• In response to Condition (b)(i), on 24 December 2013, Nan Tien Institute provided to TEQSA evidence that the course advisory committee had met to consider the three courses and provide advice, including advice that the courses clearly focus on social wellbeing and developing research skills.
• In response to Condition (b)(ii), on 9 October 2013 Nan Tien Institute provided TEQSA a mapping of the three courses against the current AQF level descriptors.
• In response to Condition (b)(iii), on 24 December 2013 Nan Tien Institute provided to TEQSA an academic staffing plan for the three courses.
• In response to Condition (b)(iv), on 24 December 2013 Nan Tien Institute provided to TEQSA evidence that a head of program for the three courses had been engaged to commence in January 2014.
• In response to Condition (b)(v), on 7 February 2014, Nan Tien Institute provided to TEQSA evidence of a financial guarantee under which it will receive funding to teach out the courses in the event that this is required.

Course accreditation

Report on accreditation of three higher education courses of study offered by Nan Tien Institute Limited (NTI)

A delegate of TEQSA has accredited, under section 49 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act), the following higher education courses of study offered by NTI for a period of seven years until 25 June 2022:

• Diploma of Business
• Bachelor of Business
• Graduate Certificate of Business Analysis

TEQSA has, under subsection 53(1) of the TEQSA Act, imposed four conditions on the accreditation of the above courses of study. NTI must:

Condition 1

Provide to TEQSA evidence of professional accreditation of the Bachelor of Business and Graduate Certificate of Business Analysis prior to commencement of course delivery, and if this is not available, NTI must provide evidence of all relevant marketing material that makes it clear to potential students that the courses are either pending professional accreditation or are not professionally accredited.

Condition 2

Prior to the commencement of delivery of all courses, NTI is to provide TEQSA with evidence of the appointment of:

1. an academic leader with requisite disciplinary qualifications and experience
2. appropriately qualified and experienced academic teaching staff for the delivery of the Business awards including abbreviated CVs
3. a qualified and experienced learning and research skills officer or equivalent

The response to this condition should also indicate F/T and P/T status and location of each staff member.

Condition 3

By 01 October 2015, provide to TEQSA evidence that NTI has developed assessment rubrics and assessment criteria for all subjects in each Business award.

Condition 4

By 01 October 2015, provide to TEQSA:

With regard to learning resources and library services, evidence to support information provided by NTI:

1. of purchase and accessibility of appropriate on-line business data bases;
2. for the NTI Sydney Campus library, an acquisition plan and purchase timeline for its physical library holdings to support the delivery of the Business awards; and
3. that NTI will make available appropriately qualified library support on site at its Sydney Campus, and provide a rationale for the nature of the role (e.g. type of appointment, number of hours, qualifications).

The course accreditation covers delivery at all Australian sites.

Main reasons for decision

TEQSA considers that the decision to apply conditions to NTI's application for accreditation of three courses of study is consistent with the basic principles for regulation in Part 2 of the TEQSA Act, as NTI is at risk of not complying with a number of the Threshold Standards. TEQSA considers that the risks of non-compliance with the Threshold Standards involve a number of matters that may affect NTI's capacity to manage and deliver its higher education awards.

• The broad issues which relate to the courses include:

  a) NTI state that the Bachelor and GradCertBA Business awards require professional accreditation. To ensure that students are adequately and accurately informed about the courses of study NTI will be required to either provide evidence of obtaining professional accreditation status to TEQSA, or provide its course marketing material that makes the status of the courses with respect to professional accreditation clear to potential students.

  b) Assessment criteria and rubrics were not available for TEQSA consideration at the time of course approval. NTI will be required to provide these to TEQSA prior to the delivery of the three Business courses.

  c) In terms of its staff resourcing and academic leadership profile, NTI will be required to appoint a Senior Academic Leader in the Business discipline to strengthen its academic capability in this field of education. NTI will also be required to appoint adequately qualified and experienced teaching staff to deliver its Business awards prior to the delivery of the courses.

  d) NTI is required to appoint an appropriately qualified learning and research skills officer (or equivalent) to support students, particularly at post graduate level, in the Business field. NTI are also required to appoint library support staff for its Sydney campus.

  e) NTI will be required to purchase its online learning resources for the Business awards prior to the delivery of the courses, and an acquisition plan and purchase timelines for physical library holdings at the Sydney campus.

Course accreditation

Report on accreditation of three higher education courses of study offered by Nan Tien Institute Limited (NTI)

A delegate of TEQSA has accredited, under section 49 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act), the following higher education courses of study offered by NTI for a period of seven years until 25 June 2022:

• Diploma of Business
• Bachelor of Business
• Graduate Certificate of Business Analysis

TEQSA has, under subsection 53(1) of the TEQSA Act, imposed four conditions on the accreditation of the above courses of study. NTI must:

Condition 1

Provide to TEQSA evidence of professional accreditation of the Bachelor of Business and Graduate Certificate of Business Analysis prior to commencement of course delivery, and if this is not available, NTI must provide evidence of all relevant marketing material that makes it clear to potential students that the courses are either pending professional accreditation or are not professionally accredited.

Condition 2

Prior to the commencement of delivery of all courses, NTI is to provide TEQSA with evidence of the appointment of:

1. an academic leader with requisite disciplinary qualifications and experience
2. appropriately qualified and experienced academic teaching staff for the delivery of the Business awards including abbreviated CVs
3. a qualified and experienced learning and research skills officer or equivalent

The response to this condition should also indicate F/T and P/T status and location of each staff member.

Condition 3

By 01 October 2015, provide to TEQSA evidence that NTI has developed assessment rubrics and assessment criteria for all subjects in each Business award.

Condition 4

By 01 October 2015, provide to TEQSA:

With regard to learning resources and library services, evidence to support information provided by NTI:

1. of purchase and accessibility of appropriate on-line business data bases;
2. for the NTI Sydney Campus library, an acquisition plan and purchase timeline for its physical library holdings to support the delivery of the Business awards; and
3. that NTI will make available appropriately qualified library support on site at its Sydney Campus, and provide a rationale for the nature of the role (e.g. type of appointment, number of hours, qualifications).

The course accreditation covers delivery at all Australian sites.

Main reasons for decision

TEQSA considers that the decision to apply conditions to NTI's application for accreditation of three courses of study is consistent with the basic principles for regulation in Part 2 of the TEQSA Act, as NTI is at risk of not complying with a number of the Threshold Standards. TEQSA considers that the risks of non-compliance with the Threshold Standards involve a number of matters that may affect NTI's capacity to manage and deliver its higher education awards.

• The broad issues which relate to the courses include:

  a) NTI state that the Bachelor and GradCertBA Business awards require professional accreditation. To ensure that students are adequately and accurately informed about the courses of study NTI will be required to either provide evidence of obtaining professional accreditation status to TEQSA, or provide its course marketing material that makes the status of the courses with respect to professional accreditation clear to potential students.

  b) Assessment criteria and rubrics were not available for TEQSA consideration at the time of course approval. NTI will be required to provide these to TEQSA prior to the delivery of the three Business courses.

  c) In terms of its staff resourcing and academic leadership profile, NTI will be required to appoint a Senior Academic Leader in the Business discipline to strengthen its academic capability in this field of education. NTI will also be required to appoint adequately qualified and experienced teaching staff to deliver its Business awards prior to the delivery of the courses.

  d) NTI is required to appoint an appropriately qualified learning and research skills officer (or equivalent) to support students, particularly at post graduate level, in the Business field. NTI are also required to appoint library support staff for its Sydney campus.

  e) NTI will be required to purchase its online learning resources for the Business awards prior to the delivery of the courses, and an acquisition plan and purchase timelines for physical library holdings at the Sydney campus.

Course accreditation

Report on accreditation of three higher education courses of study offered by Nan Tien Institute Limited (NTI)

A delegate of TEQSA has accredited, under section 49 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act), the following higher education courses of study offered by NTI for a period of seven years until 25 June 2022:

• Diploma of Business
• Bachelor of Business
• Graduate Certificate of Business Analysis

TEQSA has, under subsection 53(1) of the TEQSA Act, imposed four conditions on the accreditation of the above courses of study. NTI must:

Condition 1

Provide to TEQSA evidence of professional accreditation of the Bachelor of Business and Graduate Certificate of Business Analysis prior to commencement of course delivery, and if this is not available, NTI must provide evidence of all relevant marketing material that makes it clear to potential students that the courses are either pending professional accreditation or are not professionally accredited.

Condition 2

Prior to the commencement of delivery of all courses, NTI is to provide TEQSA with evidence of the appointment of:

1. an academic leader with requisite disciplinary qualifications and experience
2. appropriately qualified and experienced academic teaching staff for the delivery of the Business awards including abbreviated CVs
3. a qualified and experienced learning and research skills officer or equivalent

The response to this condition should also indicate F/T and P/T status and location of each staff member.

Condition 3

By 01 October 2015, provide to TEQSA evidence that NTI has developed assessment rubrics and assessment criteria for all subjects in each Business award.

Condition 4

By 01 October 2015, provide to TEQSA:

With regard to learning resources and library services, evidence to support information provided by NTI:

1. of purchase and accessibility of appropriate on-line business data bases;
2. for the NTI Sydney Campus library, an acquisition plan and purchase timeline for its physical library holdings to support the delivery of the Business awards; and
3. that NTI will make available appropriately qualified library support on site at its Sydney Campus, and provide a rationale for the nature of the role (e.g. type of appointment, number of hours, qualifications).

The course accreditation covers delivery at all Australian sites.

Main reasons for decision

TEQSA considers that the decision to apply conditions to NTI's application for accreditation of three courses of study is consistent with the basic principles for regulation in Part 2 of the TEQSA Act, as NTI is at risk of not complying with a number of the Threshold Standards. TEQSA considers that the risks of non-compliance with the Threshold Standards involve a number of matters that may affect NTI's capacity to manage and deliver its higher education awards.

• The broad issues which relate to the courses include:

  a) NTI state that the Bachelor and GradCertBA Business awards require professional accreditation. To ensure that students are adequately and accurately informed about the courses of study NTI will be required to either provide evidence of obtaining professional accreditation status to TEQSA, or provide its course marketing material that makes the status of the courses with respect to professional accreditation clear to potential students.

  b) Assessment criteria and rubrics were not available for TEQSA consideration at the time of course approval. NTI will be required to provide these to TEQSA prior to the delivery of the three Business courses.

  c) In terms of its staff resourcing and academic leadership profile, NTI will be required to appoint a Senior Academic Leader in the Business discipline to strengthen its academic capability in this field of education. NTI will also be required to appoint adequately qualified and experienced teaching staff to deliver its Business awards prior to the delivery of the courses.

  d) NTI is required to appoint an appropriately qualified learning and research skills officer (or equivalent) to support students, particularly at post graduate level, in the Business field. NTI are also required to appoint library support staff for its Sydney campus.

  e) NTI will be required to purchase its online learning resources for the Business awards prior to the delivery of the courses, and an acquisition plan and purchase timelines for physical library holdings at the Sydney campus.

Course accreditation

Report on accreditation of four higher education courses of study offered by Le Cordon Bleu Australia Pty Limited

A delegate of TEQSA has accredited under section 49 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act), the following higher education courses of study offered by Le Cordon Bleu Australia Pty Limited for a period of four years until 27 February 2019:

• Bachelor of Business (Tourism Management)
• Bachelor of Business (Convention and Event Management)

The delegate also accredited the following higher education courses of study offered by Le Cordon Bleu Australia Pty Limited (LCBA) for a period of three years until 27 February 2018:

• Advanced Diploma of Business (Tourism Management)
• Advanced Diploma of Business (Convention and Event Management)

Under subsection 53(1) of the TEQSA Act, the delegate imposed five conditions on the accreditation of the above courses of study.

Condition 1:

LCBA must provide a report, approved by its Academic Board, which reviews the learning outcomes for each subject for each course and demonstrates the constructive alignment of learning outcomes with the assessment activities as provided with the applications. The report must include how the learning outcomes have been revised to align with the appropriate Australian Qualifications Framework (AQF) level.

Condition 2:

LCBA must:

1. engage an independent, external academic expert to review its reference lists for the courses, to provide a report on the extent to which the curriculum for the courses of study draws on a current body of knowledge, and to make recommendations about the nature of any changes required to those reading lists to ensure an appropriate level of currency.
2. prior to engaging the academic expert, give TEQSA not less than seven days' notice of the expert LCBA proposes to engage and provide a short summary of the relevant expertise and experience of the nominated expert. TEQSA may notify LCBA that it is not satisfied that the nominated expert is appropriate, in which case TEQSA will provide a shortlist of no less than three suitable alternative experts. LCBA must engage one of the shortlisted alternatives to perform the review at (i).
3. provide TEQSA with a copy of the report and any recommendations by the academic expert, as well as a response to the report and recommendations endorsed by LCBA's Academic Board.

Condition 3:

LCBA must provide TEQSA with:

1. A policy and procedure which sets out LCBA's criteria for determining whether academic staff who do not meet the AQF + 1 requirement have professional experience that gives those staff the skills, knowledge and capacity to apply skills and knowledge equivalent to an AQF +1 qualification; and evidence of the application of this policy to the Central Institute of Technology (CIT) academic staff who intend to teach the courses of study.
2. Confirmation of the appointments of CIT Program Manager; and Manager, Professional Industry Placement for the delivery of the courses at CIT; and the qualifications and experience of each appointee.

Condition 4:

LCBA must:

1. engage an independent, external academic expert to provide a report on;

   a) the adequacy of the arrangements that LCBA will have in place to oversee and manage work integrated learning 'professional experience', including academic supervision of students from its new delivery site in Perth; and

   b) the extent to which LCBA's academic oversight of CIT's course management and co-ordination including moderation procedures will ensure consistent and appropriate assessment;

2. prior to engaging the academic expert, give TEQSA not less than seven days' notice of the expert LCBA proposes to engage and provide a short summary of the relevant expertise and experience of the nominated expert. TEQSA may notify LCBA that it is not satisfied that the nominated expert is appropriate, in which case TEQSA will provide a shortlist of no less than three suitable alternative experts. LCBA must engage one of the shortlisted alternatives to perform the review at (i).
3. provide TEQSA with a copy of the report and any recommendations by the academic expert, as well as a response to the report and recommendations endorsed by LCBA's Academic Board.

Condition 5:

LCBA must not recruit or enrol any students in the courses of study.

The course accreditation covers delivery at all Australian sites.

Main Reasons for the Decision

The delegate determined that the four higher education courses of study submitted for accreditation comply with the Provider Course Accreditation Standards. The assessment of the course considered arrangements for delivery of the courses by a third party, Central Institute of Technology, Perth Western Australia.

The delegate considered that the assessment of the courses raised risks of non-compliance with the Threshold Standards which involve a number of matters that may affect Le Cordon Bleu Australia Pty Limited's capacity to deliver the courses.

TEQSA considers that the decision to apply conditions to Le Cordon Bleu Australia Pty Limited's application for accreditation of four courses of study is consistent with the basic principles for regulation in Part 2 of the TEQSA Act in light of the risk that the courses may not comply with a number of the Threshold Standards.

The broad issues which relate to the courses of study include:

• learning outcomes
• reference lists for the courses
• oversight of work integrated learning
• moderation and course coordination
• arrangements for the recruitment of staff
• benchmarking
• scholarship
• course monitoring and review

Course accreditation

Report on accreditation of four higher education courses of study offered by Le Cordon Bleu Australia Pty Limited

A delegate of TEQSA has accredited under section 49 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act), the following higher education courses of study offered by Le Cordon Bleu Australia Pty Limited for a period of four years until 27 February 2019:

• Bachelor of Business (Tourism Management)
• Bachelor of Business (Convention and Event Management)

The delegate also accredited the following higher education courses of study offered by Le Cordon Bleu Australia Pty Limited (LCBA) for a period of three years until 27 February 2018:

• Advanced Diploma of Business (Tourism Management)
• Advanced Diploma of Business (Convention and Event Management)

Under subsection 53(1) of the TEQSA Act, the delegate imposed five conditions on the accreditation of the above courses of study.

Condition 1:

LCBA must provide a report, approved by its Academic Board, which reviews the learning outcomes for each subject for each course and demonstrates the constructive alignment of learning outcomes with the assessment activities as provided with the applications. The report must include how the learning outcomes have been revised to align with the appropriate Australian Qualifications Framework (AQF) level.

Condition 2:

LCBA must:

1. engage an independent, external academic expert to review its reference lists for the courses, to provide a report on the extent to which the curriculum for the courses of study draws on a current body of knowledge, and to make recommendations about the nature of any changes required to those reading lists to ensure an appropriate level of currency.
2. prior to engaging the academic expert, give TEQSA not less than seven days' notice of the expert LCBA proposes to engage and provide a short summary of the relevant expertise and experience of the nominated expert. TEQSA may notify LCBA that it is not satisfied that the nominated expert is appropriate, in which case TEQSA will provide a shortlist of no less than three suitable alternative experts. LCBA must engage one of the shortlisted alternatives to perform the review at (i).
3. provide TEQSA with a copy of the report and any recommendations by the academic expert, as well as a response to the report and recommendations endorsed by LCBA's Academic Board.

Condition 3:

LCBA must provide TEQSA with:

1. A policy and procedure which sets out LCBA's criteria for determining whether academic staff who do not meet the AQF + 1 requirement have professional experience that gives those staff the skills, knowledge and capacity to apply skills and knowledge equivalent to an AQF +1 qualification; and evidence of the application of this policy to the Central Institute of Technology (CIT) academic staff who intend to teach the courses of study.
2. Confirmation of the appointments of CIT Program Manager; and Manager, Professional Industry Placement for the delivery of the courses at CIT; and the qualifications and experience of each appointee.

Condition 4:

LCBA must:

1. engage an independent, external academic expert to provide a report on;

   a) the adequacy of the arrangements that LCBA will have in place to oversee and manage work integrated learning 'professional experience', including academic supervision of students from its new delivery site in Perth; and

   b) the extent to which LCBA's academic oversight of CIT's course management and co-ordination including moderation procedures will ensure consistent and appropriate assessment;

2. prior to engaging the academic expert, give TEQSA not less than seven days' notice of the expert LCBA proposes to engage and provide a short summary of the relevant expertise and experience of the nominated expert. TEQSA may notify LCBA that it is not satisfied that the nominated expert is appropriate, in which case TEQSA will provide a shortlist of no less than three suitable alternative experts. LCBA must engage one of the shortlisted alternatives to perform the review at (i).
3. provide TEQSA with a copy of the report and any recommendations by the academic expert, as well as a response to the report and recommendations endorsed by LCBA's Academic Board.

Condition 5:

LCBA must not recruit or enrol any students in the courses of study.

The course accreditation covers delivery at all Australian sites.

Main Reasons for the Decision

The delegate determined that the four higher education courses of study submitted for accreditation comply with the Provider Course Accreditation Standards. The assessment of the course considered arrangements for delivery of the courses by a third party, Central Institute of Technology, Perth Western Australia.

The delegate considered that the assessment of the courses raised risks of non-compliance with the Threshold Standards which involve a number of matters that may affect Le Cordon Bleu Australia Pty Limited's capacity to deliver the courses.

TEQSA considers that the decision to apply conditions to Le Cordon Bleu Australia Pty Limited's application for accreditation of four courses of study is consistent with the basic principles for regulation in Part 2 of the TEQSA Act in light of the risk that the courses may not comply with a number of the Threshold Standards.

The broad issues which relate to the courses of study include:

• learning outcomes
• reference lists for the courses
• oversight of work integrated learning
• moderation and course coordination
• arrangements for the recruitment of staff
• benchmarking
• scholarship
• course monitoring and review

Course accreditation

Report on accreditation of four higher education courses of study offered by Le Cordon Bleu Australia Pty Limited

A delegate of TEQSA has accredited under section 49 of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 (the TEQSA Act), the following higher education courses of study offered by Le Cordon Bleu Australia Pty Limited for a period of four years until 27 February 2019:

• Bachelor of Business (Tourism Management)
• Bachelor of Business (Convention and Event Management)

The delegate also accredited the following higher education courses of study offered by Le Cordon Bleu Australia Pty Limited (LCBA) for a period of three years until 27 February 2018:

• Advanced Diploma of Business (Tourism Management)
• Advanced Diploma of Business (Convention and Event Management)

Under subsection 53(1) of the TEQSA Act, the delegate imposed five conditions on the accreditation of the above courses of study.

Condition 1:

LCBA must provide a report, approved by its Academic Board, which reviews the learning outcomes for each subject for each course and demonstrates the constructive alignment of learning outcomes with the assessment activities as provided with the applications. The report must include how the learning outcomes have been revised to align with the appropriate Australian Qualifications Framework (AQF) level.

Condition 2:

LCBA must:

1. engage an independent, external academic expert to review its reference lists for the courses, to provide a report on the extent to which the curriculum for the courses of study draws on a current body of knowledge, and to make recommendations about the nature of any changes required to those reading lists to ensure an appropriate level of currency.
2. prior to engaging the academic expert, give TEQSA not less than seven days' notice of the expert LCBA proposes to engage and provide a short summary of the relevant expertise and experience of the nominated expert. TEQSA may notify LCBA that it is not satisfied that the nominated expert is appropriate, in which case TEQSA will provide a shortlist of no less than three suitable alternative experts. LCBA must engage one of the shortlisted alternatives to perform the review at (i).
3. provide TEQSA with a copy of the report and any recommendations by the academic expert, as well as a response to the report and recommendations endorsed by LCBA's Academic Board.

Condition 3:

LCBA must provide TEQSA with:

1. A policy and procedure which sets out LCBA's criteria for determining whether academic staff who do not meet the AQF + 1 requirement have professional experience that gives those staff the skills, knowledge and capacity to apply skills and knowledge equivalent to an AQF +1 qualification; and evidence of the application of this policy to the Central Institute of Technology (CIT) academic staff who intend to teach the courses of study.
2. Confirmation of the appointments of CIT Program Manager; and Manager, Professional Industry Placement for the delivery of the courses at CIT; and the qualifications and experience of each appointee.

Condition 4:

LCBA must:

1. engage an independent, external academic expert to provide a report on;

   a) the adequacy of the arrangements that LCBA will have in place to oversee and manage work integrated learning 'professional experience', including academic supervision of students from its new delivery site in Perth; and

   b) the extent to which LCBA's academic oversight of CIT's course management and co-ordination including moderation procedures will ensure consistent and appropriate assessment;

2. prior to engaging the academic expert, give TEQSA not less than seven days' notice of the expert LCBA proposes to engage and provide a short summary of the relevant expertise and experience of the nominated expert. TEQSA may notify LCBA that it is not satisfied that the nominated expert is appropriate, in which case TEQSA will provide a shortlist of no less than three suitable alternative experts. LCBA must engage one of the shortlisted alternatives to perform the review at (i).
3. provide TEQSA with a copy of the report and any recommendations by the academic expert, as well as a response to the report and recommendations endorsed by LCBA's Academic Board.

Condition 5:

LCBA must not recruit or enrol any students in the courses of study.

The course accreditation covers delivery at all Australian sites.

Main Reasons for the Decision

The delegate determined that the four higher education courses of study submitted for accreditation comply with the Provider Course Accreditation Standards. The assessment of the course considered arrangements for delivery of the courses by a third party, Central Institute of Technology, Perth Western Australia.

The delegate considered that the assessment of the courses raised risks of non-compliance with the Threshold Standards which involve a number of matters that may affect Le Cordon Bleu Australia Pty Limited's capacity to deliver the courses.

TEQSA considers that the decision to apply conditions to Le Cordon Bleu Australia Pty Limited's application for accreditation of four courses of study is consistent with the basic principles for regulation in Part 2 of the TEQSA Act in light of the risk that the courses may not comply with a number of the Threshold Standards.

The broad issues which relate to the courses of study include:

• learning outcomes
• reference lists for the courses
• oversight of work integrated learning
• moderation and course coordination
• arrangements for the recruitment of staff
• benchmarking
• scholarship
• course monitoring and review